Butbutbut... Trump said NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!!!! How can this be???
Sned in the Kardashian with the Pepsi can
Do Israel and Iran realize how bad this looks for Trump? Did they think about him at all? Did they even say thank you?
I was told we didn't start a war.
Oh right uh...hang on...it's just like....hostilities?
I heard it was a special military operation, only meant to last 3 days.
Here we go again…
Reports indicate it was a muted response to indicate an intention to deescalate. They had to do something but they didn't go crazy. We'll see, I guess.
Good for them.
The people that oppress women and gay people? Good for those people? Jesus, dude... Fuck you.
Get off your stupid high horse, America doesn't get to bomb and decide who gets to be president. In fact, America is opressing people of colour right now so lets bomb them?
Who is America not oppressing right now excepting billionaires?
Too many people don't seem to care apparently.
Sucks for us though.
Sucks for all decent people, but Israel wanted this and America is their bully so...
It's funny that you think America isn't pulling the strings from the start.
There's little difference between the two at this point. They are intertwined. Fuck both administrations.
Trunk & Netanyahu teaming up for Operation Jailbreak against Iran
Trump's only on board because he thought it was Operation Jailbait
Totally expected. What would be unexpected is firing at the country itself.
So far, reports state “fired at” but come up short of saying “hit”.
Sounds like air defenses may have intercepted all of them? At least to the extent we can trust reporting at this stage.
ngl, it’d be more satisfying to read about a successful counterstrike…
Why not attack the U.S. directly? There are plenty of coastal bases in the U.S.
I feel like it would hurt a whole lot more if they were to go after something on U.S. soil...not that I exactly want that. Being bombed at home sounds terrifying.
Im just curious what the logic was behind this.
You are getting downvoted but i agree with you its obvious they dont really try to hurt the US.
Even the missiles they did fire, ALL of them were intercepted by US missile defence and not a single person was hurt.
Its just to show that they hit back a little symbolically.
Even if they wanted to, how would they accomplish that?
Same way the U.S. flew war planes all the way to Iran.
I can cont on 0 hands how many airbases Iran has access to near the US.
Iran has no ability to do that.
Perhaps because if they did that, there’s a very high chance trump would nuke them. He’s been itching for a reason to use nukes since his first term, and that would give him the excuse he wants.
e: I think the fact I got 2 opposing comments (he’d do it without justification and he’d be stopped by the CoC even with justification) might be telling here. He’s a monkey with a machine gun, and who knows if justification would work on others in the chain of command? Perhaps they’d rather not risk that.
There will be a "terrorist" attack in the near future. The something with guns during a crowded event. My money is on a 4th of July event shooting. Sadly that's the only way Iran and other poor nations have to fight back. Until Iran and poor nations get nukes they will be taken advantage of. I'm pro Iran nukes simple because them not having them is obviously not working for anyone
There hasn't been a war on U.S. mainland in 150 years. If a misil hits it it could trigger easily WWIII. Last attack on U.S. was 9/11 and that started multiple wars.
Didn't Japan hit Oregon in ww2
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.