165
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

The page seems to be not working at the moment but keep on signing https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fresh update video from Ross about the campaign.

TL;DW:

  • There's a chance many of the signatures for the EU petition aren't real. Keep signing to build up a safety margin. Official suggestions are: 10% more minimum, 20% pretty OK, up to 40% more for an actual safety net.
  • Some countries had problems with signing using the digital ID system - suggests to use the manual method (instructions on the campaign page) or try again later.
  • Someone not related with the campaign released a SKG crypto. Don't touch it, obviously.
  • Ross heard about people harassing Pirate Software, asks to stop.
  • He's got a lot of messages to reply to, prioritises ones important to the campaign for now.
  • UK petition cleared 100k signatures. Number is most likely more reliable than the EU one.
  • Link about contacting UK MP's for those who want to do more than just sign a petition.
[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 31 points 1 week ago

If you're in the EU, you should still sign; extra signatures will be useful if it turns out some of them are invalid.

[-] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 16 points 1 week ago

To be clear... If you have already signed, thank you but do not sign again.

(I know that's not what you wanted to say, I just want to make sure it's not misunderstood).

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Does it not stop you from signing multiple times? The UK one tells you you've already signed it when you try again. I tried it again recently in case i was misremembering signing the second petition after the first one was misunderstood completely by the uk government.

[-] zerofk@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Oddly, the EU one just has a checkbox that you need to check to confirm that you haven’t signed before. I’m guessing removal of duplicates happens only after closing, along with other data validation.

I thought this strange at first too, but I think it’s because of the disparate identification methods in different countries. If everyone had a digital ID card instant checking would be doable, but note it probably isn’t.

[-] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That's not true. It depends on the country. In certain countries it will tell you if your identification number had been used before.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

For the UK one it's just tied to your email address to prevent duplicates, and you just input your name and physical address which will be used to confirm you're actually a citizen.

[-] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Wait, what happened with the first one?

[-] Burnedspaghetti@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[-] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

After giving such a bad answer to it that some other part of the government stepped in and said the answer was dramatically insufficient.

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah I signet 10 months ago. Also put the link in the post

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago

Definitely keep signing, I'm really concerned at the speed it rose , and I'm really hoping there wasn't something else at play here.

[-] threeonefour@piefed.ca 9 points 1 week ago

It was Critikal and PewDiePie saying to sign it. They could get a million signatures on literally anything.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

but dozens a minute increase in the dawn hours?

[-] pezhore@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago

Someone posted a screenshot from 4chan where they were talking about how to fake submissions... 😠

[-] vorpuni@jlai.lu 8 points 1 week ago

At the current rate (which may or may not hold and may or may not be legitimate) the initiative should beat “One of Us”, the biggest one yet with 1.9M signatures (pro-life, ultimately did nothing).

[-] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

This should not stop, the more the merry and also to ensure to filter out anomalies. 34k have already signed pass the million

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

I'm glad. But don't get your hopes up because of this. Commission could (and probably will) just say "we have considered it and we are going to do nothing".

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

We've done nothing and already completely ran out of ideas!

[-] vorpuni@jlai.lu 3 points 1 week ago

They are supposed to meet with the seven people who first put the initiative forward. It won't change their minds if they're already against the initiative but if they don't care it may sway them to hear it explained to them. I have zero expectations since EU bureaucrats live in a parallel dimension but there's some hope something happens.

[-] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

I think the commission will take action in some form. The worst case scenario in my mind is that they will only require clear labelling. Similar to what they did with smart phones recently. While this not exactly what I am hoping for, having "This game will at least be playable until XXXX" on the package or store page would still be a massive improvement over the status quo.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I dont understand how such a broad requirement would work. They just have to pick some arbitrary date, and then after that they can continue as things currently are? Can you give an example of a game where this type of labelling would have helped?

[-] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

'The Crew' by Ubisoft was sold for several months before they decided to shut it down. This would have at least forced them to communicate that before taking peoples money. I am also pretty sure that publishers don't want to put this information on the package because it could seriously hurt sales. So the effect of this labelling requirement might be that publishers build the game in a way that enables self-hosting.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

If you are saying they knew it was closing and they sold it for months anyways, that sounds like fraud. Has there been proof ubisoft decided to do this anyways?

[-] Kelly@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago

On December 14, 2023, Ubisoft delisted The Crew and its expansions from digital platforms, suspended sales of microtransactions, and announced that the game's servers would be shut down on March 31, 2024, citing "upcoming server infrastructure and licensing constraints".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crew_%28video_game%29

People who paid around us$40 for the game on December 13 were being sold a lemon.

Given that it was released in 2014 it seems likely that their licenses were given a 10 year duration and they always intended to shutdown in 2024 at the latest (of course if its user base failed to reach critical mass they could have pulled the plug earlier).

Does selling a game in 2023 when you plan to kill it in 2024 legally qualify as fraud?

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Thats not what I'm asking. You just have me evidence that they didnt sell it as soon as an EOL date was announced. Are you saying they should have stopped selling it before they publicly announce the EOL? Should they have announced and removed it as soon as the board meeting ended? How much earlier would that be in this case?

[-] Kelly@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Should they have announced and removed it as soon as the board meeting ended? How much earlier would that be in this case?

My unsubstantiated theory is the the licences they signed for all the vehicles and real world content had a 10 year lifetime.

Usually those contracts would just require that they stop selling the game, but they may have included something about the servers in the contract too.

Either way they new something was going to change in 2024 and realistically they knew which of these possibilities were viable:

  • sign new deals with all licensors and continue business as usual
  • sign new deals with cooperative licensors and modify the game to remove the others
  • remove the game from sale and keep the servers running for current customers
  • remove the game from sale and kill the servers - tell people to buy the sequal

I'd they waited until December of 2023 to have that meeting then that feels negligent.

If they had that meeting earlier and continued to sell the game (until ≈100 days to EOL) without warning customers that feels fraudulent.

[-] Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yes if we would have known that Concord only lasted two weeks then those that bought the battle pass wouldn't have bought them. Know eol timing help consumers.

[-] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sony actually issued full refunds to all customers that bought Concord.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

The game still died. One that was in development for five years, and it lasted two weeks.

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

At least we will have an official position, instead of the legal void we're currently in.

[-] Aielman15@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I swear this is not me doomering (I very much support this campaign and even signed it myself half a year ago), but I strongly suspect that at least a good chunk of those are fake. The issue is very hot in "terminally online" circles and those are the kind of people who don't really think things through before acting.

I hope the number will keep on growing until the "legit" votes make up for the fake ones.

[-] TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yay! I'm one in a million!

Can we move for a Stop Killing People now!? :)

[-] nebulaone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[-] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago

Do they still need to get the minimum in at least 7 countries? Anyone happen to know? Ive only been loosely following and i don't want to stress the website more than it is suffering lol.

[-] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

No, that requirement has already been met. The final requirement (which has just been met now) is to reach a total of 1 million signatures. Basically, all requirements are now satisfied

[-] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago
[-] exu@feditown.com 1 points 1 week ago

Do still sign if you can, some signatures might turn out to be invalid and we need a buffer against that.

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago

That's great and all, but this needs to stop being spammed everywhere. Theres two of these posts in games alone.

Crosspost, people. That's what is there for.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
165 points (99.4% liked)

Games

40429 readers
509 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS