1588
Please, do not use Brave. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I have seen many people in this community either talking about switching to Brave, or people who are actively using Brave. I would like to remind people that Brave browser (and by extension their search engine) is not privacy-centric whatsoever.

Brave was already ousted as spyware in the past and the company has made many decisions that are questionable at best. For example, Brave made a cryptocurrency which they then added to a rewards program that is built into the browser to encourage you to enable ads that are controlled by Brave.

Edit: Please be aware that the spyware article on Brave (and the rest of the browsers on the site) is outdated and may not reflect the browser as it is today.

After creating this cryptocurrency and rewards program, they started inserting affiliate codes into URL's. Prior to this they had faked fundraising for popular social media creators.

Do these decisions seem like ones a company that cares about their users (and by extension their privacy) would make? I'd say the answer is a very clear no.

One last thing, Brave illegally promoted an eToro affiliate program making a fortune from its users who will likely lose their money.

Edit: To the people commenting saying how Brave has a good out-of-the-box experience compared to other browsers, yes, it does. However, this is not a warning for your average person, this is a warning for people who actively care about their privacy and don't mind configuring their browser to maximize said privacy.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] millions@universeodon.com 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@eya I made sure I’d never use brave when I found out that the ceo is a massive homophobe

(And the whole chromium thing)

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

I dont use Brave and will never use it. But this sounds not logical.

Their ad system and affiliate URLs are not anti-privacy per-se. Its not as easy.

I will not use it as its

  • 99% controlled by Google
  • dependend on Google Addon store
  • bad UI
  • bad OS integration
  • not Arkenfox
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Just disable the ads, crypto and telemetry and suddenly none of those things are a problem anymore, just like Firefox.

[-] ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

It still uses chromium and it's susceptible to the Google's Web integrity protocols. An website using the new protocols can refuse to load on your browser if you don't accept the ads. Why is it so difficult to comprehend?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] veniasilente@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Even worse for privacy, it uses the Chrome engine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ozzy@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Firefox + Startpage is really cool. I like how their searched don't include the search parameters in the url + the built in proxy

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
1588 points (91.6% liked)

Privacy

32169 readers
350 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS