202

The truck that was supposed to revolutionize everything is flopping fast.

The hype is dead. The Tesla Cybertruck, once billed as the future of electric vehicles, is now looking like a commercial bust.

In the second quarter of 2025, Tesla sold just 4,306 Cybertrucks, down a staggering 50.8% from the 8,755 units it delivered during the same period last year, according to new data from Kelley Blue Book. This plunge is a signal that America’s most hyped truck may already be out of gas.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago

I like how people don't hate it because its electric, they hate it because it's objectively terrible. Maybe if it didn't stink like a dead nazi, people would buy it.

[-] jhymesba@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

It's ugly, and it looks like it jumped off the screen from the Cyberpunk 2077 world. It's poorly built and ineffective at the job it was designed to do. And then Elon did his thing, and now it's irrevocably tied to a dead Mid-20th Century ideology that the entire world fought to dismantle. I'm glad it's falling by the wayside. An object lesson -- don't build stupidly engineered items, and don't tout murderous ideologies that get a majority of the world against you.

[-] treesquid@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

It doesn't look like it came out of Cyberpunk, literally every vehicle in that game looks way cooler and more advanced. The Cybertruck looks like it came from a "futuristic" wireframe video game from 1985. It's obviously trying to play off DeLorean vibes, it's made as nostalgia for a 40-year old vision of a future that never came. It's like if someone made a 50s rocket-punk styled car in 1990, it's just a botched anachronistic mess, more past than future.

[-] jagermo@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

Its from the movie Freejack, trashy sci fi action flick from 1992, Mick Jagger drives something like it

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

that looks more like an APC.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

IIRC it’s a real amphibious APC used by the Royal Marines painted red.

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 13 points 1 week ago

It’s ugly

I agree completely. I mean back in the 80's they were envisioning cool stuff like this:

... and instead Telsa decided to put out something that looks like some guy tried to turn his shed into a car.

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Even amateur designers can start from the cyber truck design and make something a lot better with a few tweaks. The current design is just a great visualization of what happens when the boss purposefully ignores any suggestion and criticism from the employees. I mean, this not only happens with cars. There are many projects going that way. This is just a very visual high level example.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'd say it looks more like a futuristic barn

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah when I think of a car that's actually cyberpunk it's some civic with mods.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

its basically a giant metal coffin, which is also a charcuterie machine.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago

Its a modern day DMC DeLorean which ironically also had a raw stainless steel body. Hopefully it tanks the company just like the DeLorean did.

[-] rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social 29 points 1 week ago

I don't think the DeLorean reference is apt. That company was headed by a man who saw himself as a visionary, liked to highlight his middle initial "Z," and had a drug addiction. No connection whatsoever.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Delorean built his cars in Northern Ireland during the Troubles while also smuggling drugs to try to keep the company solvent, and he still managed to produce a better vehicle than Musk did. At least Delorean managed to pick a stainless steel alloy that was actually stainless!

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

First of all, it’s stain less not stain never. Second of all, Musk would do all the drugs instead of smuggling them. Finally, the cybertruck as is an engineering failure and no amount of money can fix it.

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Most people think of the thing in less like the tank in a tankless water heater, rather than like less sodium in reduced sodium soy sauce.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago

At least DeLorean went out for something cool: smuggling cocaine in the vehicles.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The DeLorean looked WAY cooler.

[-] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

I mean at least the Segway was built well

[-] jagermo@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

And they are fun

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

I flip them off now. I'm doing my part!

A, meme from starship troopers with the caption I'm doing my part

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

But almost six years later, the truck’s surreal design, awkward size, high price, and late delivery have turned it into a niche curiosity, not a mass-market hit.

How the fuck do you write an article about the failed Cybertruck and not acknowledge Elon’s political bullshit impacting Tesla sales?!?

Dishonest shit.

[-] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Biggest takeaway; the media is still in denial.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CanadaRocks@piefed.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The concept was quirky but it had a ton of hype. It wasn't helped by the fact that it has some fairly noticeable flaws, one being panels that are glued on and have been known to fall off. And headlights that are placed so close to the front bumper that any buildup of snow blocks them. Not smart design.

Teslastans hyped the fact that there were "2 million preorders" which was supposedly because of the mass appeal of the CT. Turns out once the novelty wore off, people just said 'meh, Id rather have a more normal truck for doing truck things' which is why the Rivian is still selling ok, the Ford Lightning is limping along and the Sliverado EV is actually a range champ with real world reports of over 800 km range that can actually tow a trailer for more than three blocks before needing a recharge.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

it was never the future, it was only meant to hype of the stocks so he can get that 56bn payout in '23, it just took longer than expected.

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 week ago
[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago

sorry mate, maybe if you know, keep it from rusting, it might be a novelty some day. you can drive it in a funny car parade or something

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 week ago
[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 week ago

i wouldn't admit it either!

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 week ago
[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Sounds like a misunderstanding from the other party. It’s not always that bad. Welcome to Lemmy!

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Driving a Cybercuck is a great way to tell society you're the village idiot.

[-] blady_blah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The stupid thing is, it was so easy to see what needed to be done. Tesla needed to release a pickup that appealed to Red State America. Functional first, but high end and ultra manly. Kind of like the F-150 lightning but cool.

Tesla needed to appeal to traditional pickup owners. Then Musk's run to the right would have actually fallen in line with that strategy. But the Cybertruck is the exact opposite of that. There are probably more techies who own cyber trucks than there are pickup owners, and that's pathetic. That's a failure to understand your target demographic. This really comes down to musks insane hubris.

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Lol function first.

Most f150s are suburban grocery getters. They just needed to release a mall crawler and keep Elon out of politics

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rooty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

What, an ugly ass vehicle that looks like it came from an early 90's video game is a flop? Whodathunkit?

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Busted ass truck is busted.

[-] lemmylump@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I will forever point and laugh like Nelson at the morons who bought these Swastikar piles of shit.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

I point them out to my partner when we see one and we both laugh. It's the ugliest piece of shit on the road.

Yesterday, we were returning from a road trip and saw a semi hauling three of them. It was completely full. Other semis on the trip had like eight cars. How inefficient and riduclous they looked. We laughed at that, too.

I'm so sad that the nazi asshole's stupid truck is a failure. /s No I'm not. I love it.

[-] Grabthar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Sadly, its numbers are comparable to Hyundai's Ioniq 6, which might be the best EV on the market right now. Seems a lot of EVs are tanking in sales now.

[-] ThunderComplex@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

I feel like 4306 units sold in one quarter is still quite a lot all things considered.

[-] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

And only 4,200 of them will have panels falling off by the end of next quarter

[-] ThunderComplex@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

I am so surprised by the panels falling off; I thought Elmer's glue was supposed to be pretty good.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
202 points (99.0% liked)

News

31223 readers
1500 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS