53
1,000 Agents to comb through Documents that Don't Exist for the ONE Specific Name of Jeffrey Epstein's Best Friend who FIRED the Judge involved in Prosecuting Jeffrey Epstein sounds INNOCENT!
-Pizzagate Believers!
So they hid everything implicating trump, and trump yelling about releasing files now is because he knows his buddies kash and bongino have confirmed this. We can assume anything released with Trump's approval has been doctored or has relevant info removed.
Trump diddled kids.
Trump diddled kids.
Don't sugarcoat it like that. Donald J Trump repeatedly raped children.
Convicted Felon Child Rapist donald trump
I mean, we could go full Daenerys Targaryen with him and name all of his crimes, but it would taoe 3 paragraphs.
Like that one monkey’s name from Gintama 🤣
Edit: here’s a link if you want to hear it being spoken https://youtu.be/G_K9bn60A4g
I feel like we're all glossing over the part where Epstein got murdered in his jail cell and the video recordings from the prison were manipulated while Trump was in charge (with Bill Barr in charge of the prison system and to such an extent that he was using prison guards as personal police for Trump).
If Epstein got murdered, wouldn't they kill his wife too?
Doesn't that just scream government efficiency to you?
1,000 people is a lot to involve in the coverup.
The more people involved the more likely it is that someone spills the details.
Well you only have to disappear the ones that find something
My thoughts exactly, although we do have a whistleblower to back up the 'they were simply that stupid' theory it also does seem too good to be true.
I’m betting they are all vetted cult members and will not turn on dear leader.
Did they do their darnedest to pick only people who are true believers? No doubt. Is that a property that's perfectly ascertainable and immutable? Absolutely not.
The number of people increases the difficulty of hiding a conspiracy, but so does the time scale. I suspect we'll know a lot more than we do now in 20 years about this, for whatever that's worth.
1000 people pouring over docs that like a week ago "didn't exist" and were a "hoax" just to burn the ones with Trump's name on them seems to indicate there's either 1) a fuck tonne of documents or 2) Trump is mentioned a fuck tonne in those documents.
1000 agents who should be jailed.
That’s a pretty significant doc review team.
I just don't believe anything about this case either way.
I believe Trump and Epstein were friends, and that Trump is a rapist, and that Trump knew Epstein was trafficking and raping children, because those are all things Trump has admitted or confirmed out loud into a microphone on camera. I don't need additional proof of any of those things, but I would not be surprised to learn that it exists in the Epstein files.
Trump also denied all of those things, but that's not he said/she said where you have to present both sides as though they are equal. A man who constantly changes his story is not a credible source of information, and his denials can be dismissed outright.
His denials are confessions. I didn't know they were friends until I heard him say "I don't know him well" and that convinced me.
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
53 points (100.0% liked)
politics
24937 readers
771 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS