Valve Jannies with necrodisease, kill top google result threads with no answer : steam

[-] tane@lemy.lol 0 points 3 days ago

Downvotes from dipshit lemmoids are like badges of honor op. That’s how you know you’re right.

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I try to put no weights on the value of upvotes (and the opinions of others generally)
The internet is too much of a nasty place to give it that kind of power

but thanks

[-] EccTM@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago

Just make a new post asking the same thing, instead of trying to revive a post that was retired EIGHT years ago.

[+] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml -9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nobody on google is going to find the answer now, try again.
Nobody from google is going to be able to post the solution if they have it.

[-] EccTM@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

So? That's googles problem to index search results better. If that eight year old thread was any good, you wouldn't have needed to revive it to ask for the solution anyway.

[+] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml -12 points 1 week ago

You have necrodisease

The question of "How to pickup the unconcious soldier in deus ex tutorial and why none of the keybinding works"
is the kind of question that is answered over the decades nor mere months.
Dozens of people play that game per year and even fewer even do the tutorial.
Normal people just find the thread, find it has no answer, and uninstall the game since it's broken.

This idea that the thread initial posting date and any relevance whatsoever is exactly the problem.
Anyone that believes that is perpetuating the problem.

[-] EccTM@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

What you call necrodisease, the rest of the world calls common sense.

At this point, the issue the original thread was created for was already solved, and more than half the thread was people being trolls. anyone that cared in that thread had long since moved on to other things. Why would notifying them be of any use? You're not even facing the same issue! Start a fresh thread, outline all the details involved (including that you're playing with a co-op mod!) in your own thread, and discuss it without any irrelevant baggage.

The answer to your question is that in vanilla DX, you press Right Mouse Button, and if the body has items on it, you'll loot those first, and then pressing RMB again would pick up the body. If there's no free space in your inventory, you'll just be stuck trying to loot the body. In mods like DX: Revision, they made tweaks so the items would be dropped on the ground if you've no inventory space, but you're playing with an unnamed co-op mod, so all bets are off. Seeing as all the missions were made with only one player in mind, Player 2 might be stuck trying to loot it over and over, because the flag that says the body was searched is only getting set for Player 1.

[+] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml -6 points 1 week ago

This isn't about the content of this particular post. We've figured out a workaround. We're not even playing revision, that is just the place where the discussion, the most relevant google-determined discussion space was happening and now its been shutdown.

And no, right mouse button doesn't work. Everyone else who tries it like us is going to end up with the same problem. And now the discussion is closed so there will never be answer, nobody can post a answer, ask clarification no one, the micro community of the people who are having this problem, has been shattered forever by a careless, obsessive mods who probably has incentives to close threads/perform actions/increase his key performance indicators, that's why they're doing it, "necroposting" is just the handwave to justifying shutdown things.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

there will never be answer, nobody can post a answer, ask clarification no one, the micro community of the people who are having this problem,

Or you can just make a new post, solving all of those problems instantly. This tantrum you're having isn't going to do anything though.

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

Oops, no one ever finds the new thread, but why answer it once in the place google says it should when we can re-answer it forever in places no one will find. I guess that's the discord way.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

no one ever finds the new thread,

Yes, because you refuse to make it. As soon as it's made it can be indexed and start to turn up on google. You do understand that Google ensured they'd have a mechanism for content that didn't exist when google was invented to be added to the searches, right? And so new content is continually added? And will quickly overtake less relevant content like a thread that nobody's interacted with in nearly a decade? So "places no one will find" is just something you made up so you can piss and cry instead of just making a new thread.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 9 points 1 week ago

I honestly don't know why reviving threads is so bad. If there's a place that has the conversation you need, then what is so bad about it? Stackoverflow I get if you're going off topic or if you need to start a new one for a new problem, but it makes sense to me if you have the same issue and found an issue - or even better a solution to a years old problem. Why as a moderator would you be against that?

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

I think it's a habit, of forum dwellers, sitting in the chronological view, pressing that F5 button for some dopamine, for something new, then an old thread shows up and they get very uppity, they report, the mods are annoyed, they don't care, they close the thread it increases their action quota key performance indicator, none of the people involved even know what google had to do with it, they think all other forum users are like them, refreshing that post chronological order, not there to find answers but waiting for novel entertaining question, not "old settled stuff from 8 years ago". And that's how decades spanning conversations get ended without a second thought and that's why forums are dying because those are the people running it.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 3 points 1 week ago

That's the only thing that I've ever been able to think of, that mods don't like it so they end it - that they have some sort of "engagement" metric for new threads so why have an old one that is active when we could start a new one. At the very least a mod could say "Start a new thread, I'll update this one with a link to the new one for people who stumble on this later.

[+] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml -9 points 1 week ago

Moderator "necrodisease" is the belief that if a post is older than a couple page of the forum's front page, then posting to it is "necroposting" because if it's old it's resolved and therefore should be closed.

And then you have to stupid places where they auto close everything after a while.

And that's why your google forum threads end up going nowhere

[-] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

...and if you make a new post about the same issue, they say "this has been asked before. Search the forum. Locking this thread" :D

Steam