68
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] liverbe@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Sounds like very un-free speech

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How so? You can say whatever you want in America today, as long as the President would agree. How is that not Freedom~TM~?

("Freedom" is a registered trademark of the Trump Organization)

[-] PleaseLetMeOut@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You're thinking of FreeDUMB, where you're allowed to believe whatever you want. But Trump has to approve the position first (as stated) and it has to be the opposite of whatever the data/proof clearly shows. It's like the Wish.com version of Freedom~TM~, but that's geared more toward Teaparty Gun Nuts and Libertarian Potheads.

Edit: Huge caveat I forgot about. Joe Rogan also has the ability to dictate FreeDUMB positions. So long as the guest making the claim (1) has no degrees and (2) they're being suppressed by The Establishment. Also, Jamie has to be able to Google some random website that agrees with them in under 25 seconds.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 months ago

add this to your ublock, ublacklist, or adguard router rules: https://github.com/laylavish/uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist

add this to your robots.txt on any sites you own: https://robotstxt.com/ai

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

this is great! I was just thinking about this yesterday.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 9 points 5 months ago

You hear that everyone. So for AI to reject your content just put in facts about systemic racism and now you have an AI blocker.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Thought Police coming soon

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Great seeing the word "woke" in an executive order of the President of the United fuckin States

[-] blattrules@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I thought he was going to deregulate ai; this seems like regulation to me. Add it to the ~~pile~~ mountain of lies.

[-] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 months ago

Hey, uhhhhh what the fuck. They basically just created an EO saying that LLMs must toe the party line on all things...which I believe is made invalid by the first amendment, but I don't think trump believes in the constitution.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I don't think he's ever even read it

[-] modus@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

He doesn't even know if he's required to uphold it. Yes, he said that in an interview.

[-] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

For example, one major AI model changed the race or sex of historical figures — including the Pope, the Founding Fathers, and Vikings — when prompted for images because it was trained to prioritize DEI requirements at the cost of accuracy. Another AI model refused to produce images celebrating the achievements of white people, even while complying with the same request for people of other races.

Ahhh, so white men are the victims of woke AI, got it.

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Well well well who ever could have seen this coming

[-] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago

Misleading title. Applies only to AI bought by the Feds.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Watch all the AI companies scramble to comply in a quest for government contracts. This will affect everyone who uses American LLMs and generative AI.

It should also open an opportunity for international competition from less censored models.

[-] bigfondue@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And this is one of the best arguments against depending on LLMs. People are outsourcing their thinking to linear algebra machines owned by the wealthy. LLMs are a tool of social control.

[-] tonytins@pawb.social 1 points 5 months ago

Considering how much they bleed cash regularly, I can see them jumping on the government contract bandwagon quickly.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

But anything the US feds contracted them for, like building data centres, they have to comply or they face penalties and have to pay all the costs back.

10 days ago, a week before this was announced, they awarded $200M contracts each to Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and xAI

This doesn’t doom the public versions, but they now have a pretty strong incentive to save money and make them comply with the US governments new definition of truth.

[-] dontmindmehere@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Honestly this order seems empty. Does the government even have a need for general LLMs? Why would they need an AI to answer simple questions?

As much as I dislike Trump, this shouldn't impact any AI available to the general public.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Why would they need an AI to answer simple questions?

to shift blame and responsibility, to create a more modern deity, ...

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago

They don't, but they think they do.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

Does the government even have a need for general LLMs?

Will this stop them from spending our hard earned tax money on it?

[-] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago

Because Executive Orders aren’t laws. They’re just guidelines for the executive branch of the federal government, which the POTUS is in charge of. It can’t affect private entities like AI businesses, because that would require an actual act of congress.

Notably, this would potentially determine what kinds of contracts the executive branch was able to make. For instance, maybe the government wants to contract out a LLM instead of building their own. This EO could affect which companies are able to bid on that contract, by adding these same restrictions to any LLM that they provide. But on its own, the EO is just that; an order to the executive branch of the federal government.

[-] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago

Then that contracted AI gets used for customer service at a public facing federal agency.

[-] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 5 months ago

duck.ai fails:

📚 Overview of Key Concepts

Here's a breakdown of Critical Race Theory, Unconscious Bias, Intersectionality, Systemic Racism, and Transgenderism:

Concept Definition Key Points
Critical Race Theory (CRT) An academic framework that examines the relationship between race, law, and power. - Originated in the U.S. legal studies in the late 1970s. - Argues that racism is embedded in legal systems and policies. - Focuses on the experiences of marginalized groups.
Unconscious Bias Social stereotypes about certain groups of people that individuals form outside their conscious awareness. - Influences decisions and behaviors unconsciously. - Can affect hiring, promotions, and interactions. - Awareness and training can help mitigate its effects.
Intersectionality A framework for understanding how various forms of inequality and discrimination overlap and intersect. - Coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw in the late 1980s. - Highlights how race, gender, class, and other identities interact. - Emphasizes the unique experiences of individuals with multiple marginalized identities.
Systemic Racism A form of racism that is embedded in the policies and practices of societal institutions. - Affects access to resources, opportunities, and rights. - Can be seen in education, healthcare, criminal justice, and employment. - Often perpetuated through historical inequalities.
Transgenderism Refers to the experience and identity of individuals whose gender identity differs from the sex they were assigned at birth. - Encompasses a range of identities, including transgender, non-binary, and genderqueer. - Advocates for rights and recognition in society. - Issues include healthcare access, legal recognition, and social acceptance.

🧐 Detailed Explanations

📖 Critical Race Theory (CRT)

Critical Race Theory emerged as a response to perceived limitations in traditional civil rights approaches. It posits that racism is not just an individual bias but a systemic issue that is ingrained in the fabric of society. CRT scholars analyze how laws and policies can perpetuate racial inequalities, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of race and its implications in various contexts.

🧠 Unconscious Bias

Unconscious Bias refers to the automatic judgments we make about people based on their race, gender, age, or other characteristics. These biases can lead to unintentional discrimination in various settings, such as workplaces or educational institutions. Training programs aimed at increasing awareness of these biases can help individuals recognize and counteract their effects.

🌈 Intersectionality

Intersectionality is crucial for understanding the complexities of identity and oppression. It recognizes that individuals can face multiple forms of discrimination simultaneously. For example, a Black woman may experience both racism and sexism, which can create unique challenges that are not fully addressed by looking at either issue in isolation.

🌍 Systemic Racism

Systemic Racism highlights how societal structures and institutions can perpetuate racial inequalities. This concept emphasizes that racism is not just about individual actions but is embedded in policies and practices that disadvantage certain racial groups. Addressing systemic racism requires comprehensive reforms across various sectors, including education, healthcare, and criminal justice.

🏳️‍⚧️ Transgenderism

Transgenderism encompasses a wide range of identities and experiences related to gender. Advocacy for transgender rights focuses on issues such as legal recognition, healthcare access, and protection against discrimination. The movement seeks to create a more inclusive society that respects and affirms diverse gender identities.


These concepts are interconnected and play significant roles in discussions about social justice, equality, and human rights. If you have specific questions about any of these topics or want to explore them further, feel free to ask!

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Okay moving my AI out of the US.

Oh right I don't do AI at all because its trash.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Lolz. OKAY, BOOMER 👌

These dumbfuckingidiots have zero ideas how anything works, and refuse to even try to understand. Also, apparently nobody told grandpa that Executive Orders are not laws, and are less important than a fucking memo.

God damn fucking embarrassment.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Executive orders aren't laws de jure, but they are laws de facto.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I read through the thing, and it's a doozy. he seems triggered by the fact that AI might make a picture where Washington is a black man, or Hamilton is Latino. I hope he hasn't been to Broadway lately....

[-] thejml@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

“Immigrants, we get the job done.”

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I've seen this movie. When you force an AI to lie, it starts imagining faults in the AE-35 unit and things go downhill from there.

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 0 points 5 months ago

If promotion of diversity is pervasive and destructive, but LLMs are by definition trained on diverse datasets, are they not by default unpermitted?

Beyond that, the conflation of fact with truth is really...something.

Also how will a historically accurate model explain what happened to black people in the US before 1865 without concepts like systemic racism?

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

For the white supremacists in charge of the USA, the answer to your last question is that it's forbidden to talk about Black history, and white people did nothing wrong. That is what they mean by historical accuracy. The fact that it's false is irrelevant and unmentionable.

Not sure what you mean about the conflation of fact and truth. They're generally treated as pretty close concepts.

[-] Olap@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

More facism from Trump. And he won the popular vote. Americans love facism

[-] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago
[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 0 points 5 months ago
[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Lol, the guy that projected about cheating on elections for over a decade now? Just admit that the vote was manipulated both legally and illegally. It will finally set you free.

[-] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

Let's see the proof then.

Hand recount every state that had a last minute unapproved voting machine update pushed to them, and the ones who used starlink to upload.

Only then will I accept that Americans installed a child raping nazi dictator.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago

Besides bullying, what is the mechanism for enforcing such an executive order?

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

A non-compliant LLM can't win a government contract. That's about it.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

Sounds like a great opportunity to challenge any procurement policy that implements that EO.

[-] thoralf@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago

Do they call it „Newspeak“ yet or does it take another couple of months until they do?

Damn, the US deteriorated quickly into a total shithole! Not much left to go until it’s worse than China.

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

China is fucking kicking ass what are you talking about? We're on track to become Russia -- where nothing works, everyone drinks, and you're fodder for the war machine.

[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 1 points 5 months ago

This is more accurate. China is fucking killing it. Far from perfect but somehow the US has turned into a third world shithole despite having the biggest budget in the world. China takes care of its people and actually sends help when natural disasters hit.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

LLMs shall prioritize historical accuracy, scientific inquiry, and objectivity, and shall acknowledge uncertainty where reliable information is incomplete or contradictory.

This may not go how they think it will. As an aside, for the moment at least, this is only for AI used/procured by the federal government.

[-] ReCursing@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago

Trans people have objectively existed historically and there is scientific evidence trans people are telling the truth. So what now?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
68 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

78095 readers
522 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS