I saw someone reported this post for changing the title of the article. Nevertheless, in this case, the post title that was used appears to be more objective, more informative, less of a clickbait title than the original, and the author of the post was upfront about this modification from the outset, so I’m going to let it stand.
If there’s any way I can be more transparent about it or a better way to go about it I’m happy to oblige. Article titles nowadays just aren’t forthcoming. Intentionally so to get people to click.
I just wanna make sure the important bit is surfaced.
Appreciate the effort!
This really says it all. I don't give a crap who's in the Epstein files—they should all be investigated.
Exactly. Democrats are not a goddamn cult. The pedocons, on the other hand...
I haven’t checked if all of those are real Trump things and I really don’t want to know
Too bad, you get to know. They're all 100% real.
The Trump Cologne is the fucking weirdest of the bunch. Who wants to smell like an 80 year old man who eats nothing but McDonalds?
Maybe it's the scent his 'helpers' use to neutralise the smell of an 80 year old man who eats nothing but McDonalds, so it basically smells like the complete opposite of him?
She forgot to include bill clinton steaks, bill clinton vodka and tear up her diploma from bill clinton university, but yeah, they all check out.
Monica Lewinsky was 22 years old, an adult, when she sucked Bill Clinton's cock. Who the fuck cares?
Trump and the Republicans rape children.
Well now we know what the Maxwell "testimony" is going to be:
Trump was never there, but Clinton was there every weekend.
Annnnd pardoned.
“Epstein and I were about to abduct someone when Trump swooped in with a golden greatsword and his 6’5” 220lb frame and threatened to cut us down. He was truly an American hero that day.”
No mention of his 0% body fat?
It’s implied that he has -1000% body fat.
Quite literally body fat turns itself into muscle on his body.
They'll spin it as "now she's ready to talk!"
But the truth is she's already talked, and said multiple times she has nothing else she hasn't said.
The reason she never got anything for info, is she's already lied and willing to say anything to be released.
I fully expect her to "exonorate" trump, blame all his enemies, get released...
And dead almost immediately so nothing else can be said.
I do love the potential of Trump throwing a deal at Maxwell to name Clinton in the Epstein files to finally 'get' the Clintons, only to them have it blow up in his face if Clinton then turned around and named Trump as being there as well. I don't believe either will happen but it's a fun thought. You just know if Bill is going down he's taking everybody with him.
So the obvious fix is that they're going to meet with Maxwell and secure her false testimony in exchange for a pardon, but at this point, no one's going to believe her if she says Trump was never involved. If she's smart, and I hope she is, she realizes that a pardon with Trump still in power is worthless. There's no way they'd let a loose end like her live out her days, too much of a risk. In that case the best option would be to play along and act like that's what you're going to do, get in the hot seat in front of Congress, swear on a book, then tell the absolute uncut truth about EVERYTHING that Trump, and any other rich politicians, then explain that her life is in danger and that Trump wants her dead because of what she knows, and that she has even more info.
Drop that fucking bombshell in front of Congress and the whole world, and she may actually come out of things a free woman who's somewhat redeemed herself, and completely fucked over a lot of shitty human beings. If she plays ball with Trump, no one will believe her, and she'll just end up suicided in a few months. I'm sure she's well aware of the likely scenarios. You can't run and hide from a psychopath who's in charge of the best military and equipment in the world. You have to kill the king in front of his own court.
no one’s going to believe her
Give the Wingnut Wurlitzer a few weeks to work the crowd.
Plenty of people scoffed at QAnon and the MIA/POW guys or Sovereign Citizens or Scientologists in the beginning. But enough time and memes and AM Radio Heads screaming at their audiences. Now its just a big part of the received wisdom of the crowd. In the wrong group, you're weird if you don't believe their dogma.
If she plays ball with Trump, no one will believe her, and she’ll just end up suicided in a few months.
If she plays ball with Trump, a bunch of the WSJ Trump-Epstein articles go away and we get back to calling Columbia students antisemitic for protesting genocide.
Wait, was the POW/MIA thing some kind of conspiracy? My dad always flew one of those when I was a kid. He was also a card carrying NRA member so it wouldn’t be that shocking.
Wait, was the POW/MIA thing some kind of conspiracy?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War_POW/MIA_issue
Considerable speculation and investigation have been devoted to a hypothesis that a significant number of missing U.S. service members from the Vietnam War were captured as prisoners of war by communist forces and kept as live prisoners after U.S. involvement in the war concluded in 1973. A vocal group of POW/MIA activists has maintained that there has been a concerted conspiracy by the Vietnamese and U.S. governments since then to hide the existence of these prisoners. The U.S. government has steadfastly denied that prisoners were left behind or that any effort has been made to cover up their existence. Popular culture has reflected the "live prisoners" theory, such as in the 1985 film Rambo: First Blood Part II. Several congressional investigations have looked into the issue, culminating with the largest and most thorough, the United States Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs of 1991–93, which found "no compelling evidence that proves that any American remains alive in captivity in Southeast Asia."
It was Ross Perot's flagship issue during the early 80s
She should declare she has documents and evidence on a deadman switch.
She must. If she didn't she'd be dead already.
LOL, he's coming off so innocent.
Dear Trumpy,
Yes, Bill Clinton is a piece of shit and sex pest at best. We have no problems with Billie Clinton being investigated.
Sincerely, Leftists
It's always been so weird when he does that. No one on the left is out here worshiping Biden or Bill or Hillary.. I mean.. why would we? Sure, you may like one of them more than the other or whatever but, it's not like a cult of personality situation. But Trump can't see past his ego.
“You know, you should focus on Clinton. You should focus on the president of Harvard, the former president of Harvard. He should focus on some of the hedge fund guys — I’ll give you a list,” Trump said to the report’s query.
A list, you say? And where did you get this list you will give us? From an Epstein client list perhaps? One that doesn't exist but which1000s of FBI guys have searched through looking for references to you. A list that you are not on, but which was created, according to you, by Clinton, Biden, and Obama to smear you? That list?
No no, you misunderstand, Trump gives the list he himself created.
He wants those people not just removed from his own life but also wishes them to endure demeaning and progressively worsening life altering events.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News