There's a reason pixels are preferred, it's not some kind of malicious conspiracy. The most common sense reason being that there's a lot of overlap and cross-pollination of devs in the android world. between Google and graphene os in particular.

Pixels are also targeted because it's a mass-produced flagship with decent specs that is the closest thing to being already rooted off the shelf. It's the path of least resistance. Plus the used market is robust. A used carrier unlocked pixel 1 or 2 models behind the latest one can be obtained for several hundred dollars cheaper than it originally retailed for.

It takes effort to support additional brands/models.

Most brands lock their bootloaders and make "owning" the device difficult.

I bought a used Pixel 6 (for about $120 on Swappa) and installed GrapheneOS. I understand the irony of deGoogling and using a Pixel phone. From what I understand, the core reason GrapheneOS relies on Pixel phones is because they offer hardware security features (like the Titan M chip), an unlockable and re-lockable bootloader, and guaranteed long-term updates.

My favorite part of my phone (besides the ultimate security and privacy) is that my only "app store" (besides the GrapheneOS store) is Obtainium. There is nothing on F-Droid or Google Play that I can't find (that I use/need) with Obtainium and IronFox. If I absolutely need to access something that requires proprietary or unwanted applications, I use IronFox to browse the website (my bank for instance). I have complete control over what my phone does and I only have FOSS software installed. It is a lot more work than I think most people would be willing to do, but it is important to me, and I think it is the only way (for me, this is subjective) to be truly free of Google or Apple and still use a smart phone.

Other "privacy" ROMS still communicate with Google in some way. The other ROMS are moving in the right direction, though. /e/OS, for instance, switched to AOSP instead of LineageOS, but it uses microG. By its very nature, microG communicates with Google, so that is not something I am interested in using. Some of the GNU/Linux mobile projects are showing promise (check out postmarketOS ), but they are a ways away from actually being reasonably usable on a newer everyday main device.

In conclusion, yes, just end it all. The best I can come up with is to deGoogle and reject all big-tech.

So OP doesn't know what the fuck they're talking about. Yes, I see...

Im out of the loop, did something happen with GrapheneOS?

The spying, as you call it, at the OS level is one thing, the data leakage at an App level is a different thing entirely. The lengths that the Google Play store goes to hide permissions and the poor level of granularity, let alone the wholesale outsourcing of service critical applications and their "required" permissions is beyond the pale and not regulated, let alone enforced, in any way.

For shits and giggles, you should check the permissions associated with your bank, telco, government, medical and other life essential applications, never mind the ones you use for entertainment.

A crackdown by whom?

The people who have the power to change it are the people who want it the way that it is.

Protests don't matter. Boycotts don't matter. For one simple reason.

You're not their customer. The people buying the data they collect from you are. There will never be enough people willing to do away with their precious smartphones and tablets to make a dent in ithat.

I feel your frustration... though a decent phone w/o locked Android shouldn't require global thermonuclear war I hope!

I stress about what phone, if any, I'll be able to install a non-bloatware, rooted, vanila OS on once the models my wife & I have become too 'obsolete'. (OnePlus 5T with LineageOS).