54
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 23 points 1 week ago

I find this as good news. People aren't willing to accept below a certain standard, which, admittedly is lower than mine, but the standard is still there. This reaction is causing me to regain some faith in humanity.

[-] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago

I am positively surprised people noticed it is AI. I mean, I only see those example images in the article, they didn't trigger any red flags for me in particular. But maybe there's more in the actual magazine that does stand out.

[-] 474D@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You can't really notice but the tiny caption credits AI as the model

[-] MisterCurtis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Taking unrealistic body image literally.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

"p47: How to give your man the sensual massage of his life by using all twelve of your fingers"

[-] roserose56@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Now Vogue, and next only fans models. Loool

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 5 points 1 week ago

As if there aren't already thousands of AI OF models. Most probably operated by the same guy.

[-] roserose56@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Indeed! But it's not only the AI models, but real model's managed by other people or AI.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

change to faux.

[-] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

I know quite a few fashion brands are quietly switching to AI. As in scrapping whole departments of people who deal with production. Waiting for the push back from consumers but something makes me think this is just going to be the new normal for a while. It's looking pretty grim for anyone working in the industry.

[-] Zidane@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I feel like you aren't thinking about the poor shareholders :^(

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Oh look you gave it a little nose.

[-] mossberg590@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That is some lazy AI. The photo is Kathy Irlend's face.

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

Lol, I thought it looked like Denise Richards

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I thought it looked like Christopher McDonald photoshopped to be a woman.

[-] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you! That's exactly who I was thinking of, but couldn't place it.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This article reads like it was generated by AI.

[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It's authentic human slop.

They're essentially describing Twitter drama as if it were news. How many people canceled (doesn't say)? Has Vogue made a statement (no idea)?

It's not a story, it's a person describing what they were scrolling while they were on the toilet as if it were news.

[-] jagermo@feddit.org -1 points 1 week ago

Ai generated or photoshopped to shit - not really a difference, imho

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

At least with photoshopped models, some people are getting paid. :(

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Some Indians are getting paid to make these ai workflows

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

13277 readers
142 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS