In pf2 druid and throughout my rpg life I tend toward support classes starting with the cleric in the D&D box days. Prefer magical classes. Fantasy is just not fantasy to me without magic. I will say that I have never been big on martials types, the monk being an exception, but in pf2 im much more likely to. Whats even funnier is thief has been my most unlikely to go with. Its almost the anti cleric. But man in pf2 it rocks. The way they balanced everything opens up much more play for me. I almost can't make up my mind. Still the druid is my favorite.
No matter what I try, I always end up playing Swashbucklers. I just can't help myself.
I usually play ranged martials. In 5e, is was basically exclusively rangers, and in AD&D2 it was a ranged fighter. I've always kind of played fairly timidly, trying to stay back, kite enemies, and avoid actually taking hits.
I've only gotten to play PF2 as a GM. My table only has 2 players, so I have a GMPC tagging along with the party. I wanted someone explicitly defensive in nature, so I originally spec'd them as a Champion. It wasn't the best fit for who the character was supposed to be -- they weren't devote, and they weren't in any way magical -- but I made it work. When the Guardian playtest launched, I respeced him immediately.
Guardian has been a real breath of fresh air for me. Since the GMPC is there to be a meat shield, and because I'm not especially attached to him, using the Guardian as a mobile interceptor has been a lot of fun, even as I do everything to make sure he exists solely to shine the other players. Also, GMing has really helped me deal with my hesitation to get into the fray -- the NPC monsters exist to be killed, and I'm happy to put them in positions to be killed.
If I ever get to a PF2 table where I'm just a player, I'm absolutely rolling another Guardian. Especially with the buffs that came with it's official release. A utility defender is scratching an itch I didn't know I had.
pathfinder