2
submitted 2 weeks ago by Pro@reddthat.com to c/news@lemmy.world

A United Airlines flight traveling from Washington Dulles International Airport made an emergency landing last month after the pilot declared a mayday call shortly after takeoff due to suspected engine failure.

United flight 108, bound for Munich, Germany, was forced to return to Dulles on July 25 “to address a mechanical issue,” the airline told CNN.

The plane, a Boeing 787, was carrying 219 passengers and 11 crew members, the airline said.

Minutes into its ascent and at nearly 5,000 feet, the pilot told air traffic control, “Engine failure, left engine, United 108 declaring an emergency. Mayday, mayday, mayday,” according to recorded air traffic control audio.

An air traffic controller asked the pilot, “Are you able to make your way back to the field at this time” by turning right. “There’s nobody between you and the field,” the controller said.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] afk_strats@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I thought "mayday" was outdated and "pan-pan" is used nowadays

[-] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Pan-pan is less serious

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Mayday is immediate assistance required. Reserved for things that place the aircraft in jeopardy, like fire, engine failure, explosive decompression, etc.

Pan Pan is for less serious things like maybe a single system failure, a pressurization problem, things that are not time critical.

[-] afk_strats@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Gotcha. So both are declaring an emergency but with different urgency

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The words are “attention getters”. They don’t by default declare an emergency. They basically tell people on the frequency to stfu and listen, especially ATC. As you can see in the transcribed statement by the pilot, s/he specifically declared an emergency.

[-] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Good that it got catched that early

[-] remon@ani.social 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What do you mean caught early? It was an engine failure ... you tend to notice those immediately and it's not like there is much room to catch them later.

[-] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It is more corredt to say "catcheded"

[-] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Pronounced "cachéed"

[-] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

Any pilot nerds out there? Is this a normal situation to use “mayday” for? I know that plane can fly with one engine (though not sure if that’s the case during ascent at only 5000 ft), but it seems like ATC would give them priority as soon as they asked for it.

I sort of thought mayday was only for extremely dire circumstances.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

It’s not as bad as the news makes it sound but it’s not a great situation. With all the posts on mundane airline issues I’m thinking someone is out to give the industry a black eye. It’s still the safest form of travel.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's statistically the safest.

But stats don't really matter when it's you on the plane and you go down and are almost guaranteed to die.

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social -1 points 2 weeks ago

The plane, a Boeing 787

Because, you knew it was before you clicked.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

News

31722 readers
931 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS