112
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

So, a few of us have been unhappy for a long time and we have been working toward figuring out what it would take to unionize.

Last Saturday, someone came to the bakery and put flyers under everyone's windshield wiper on their cars. Naturally, some of those cars were management, and more importantly the owner.

Today we had a meeting where they tried to do that "you don't need a union, we can talk if anyone has any issues" thing and a bunch of us laid into the owner about a bunch of things and called him out for trying to stop using organizing.

We have a contact with the local union rep and we are setting up a meeting with them next Friday.

I was wondering if anyone has any insights into what we can expect to happen in the next few weeks. The boss wants to sit down with us troublemakers, and we figure we might as well. It's not going to sway us from our goal, if anything, it will be another chance to slap the boss around again.

Here are some of our issues. I don't know what things fall under the scope of what a union can do for us.

We work long, unpredictable hours in a non-climate controlled baking facility. It's often over 100°f in there.

Our manager uses her weapons grade incompetence to micromanage us into a state of absolute chaos every day, often to the detriment of the product, which we get blamed for and have to remake.

We never know when we are getting a raise, and it's all vibes based numbers anyway. Lower than industry standard.

We recently got into a position where a huge company got majority shareholder status and they want us to double our output.

The facility is unsafe and a lot of our equipment doesn't work, making the job very hard to do.

There is more stuff that I will bring up if I can think of it. I'm writing this after a 13 hour shift of standing in front of the oven. My brain is melted.

Any advice or experiences you want to share would be great!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chana@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago

Okay so also I will address your specific questions.

We work long, unpredictable hours in a non-climate controlled baking facility. It's often over 100°f in there.

The temperature is working conditions and a safety issue. Both 100% things for a union to negotiate. Unpredictable hours is something a company lawyer will argue are a management decision necessary for the company to function. It will be a demand to bargain and is winnable. Innoculate people from management's rhetoric on this.

Our manager uses her weapons grade incompetence to micromanage us into a state of absolute chaos every day, often to the detriment of the product, which we get blamed for and have to remake.

Whike you cannot write, "fire Karen" into a contract, you can bargain for working conditions that prevent her incompetence and may end up with her being fired. Really, your productivity doesn't really matter unless you are really into bakes goods or something, from the workers' perspective. The company should care about that instead. But what you may want to bargain is for predictable schedules, professional development opportunities, and a reliable, respectful workplace. Once you have a union you can also just have constant meetings with this manager and your rep and exhaust them.

If you enumerate exactly what her problems are re: your conditions you can create a list to imoroce them. This becomes an article for bargaining. As always, you will demand more than you expect to get.

We never know when we are getting a raise, and it's all vibes based numbers anyway. Lower than industry standard.

This is 100% a union thing. This is what you will absolutely win. This is what you strike for. Every contract you will get a raise and it will be above industry average because you will demand more. This is the one thing where you will stick hard to your demand and not negotiate once the demand is public. This is your centerpiece. Something like, "35% raise!". Emphasize that you are underpais but that you perform well. Gather stats about other similar workplaces to prove it.

We recently got into a position where a huge company got majority shareholder status and they want us to double our output.

That's their problem. They try to make it yours. The union will make that distinction by setting a baseline for working conditions - pay, hours, etc. You can bargain for positions to be full time and regular hours. Then it is on them to hire more people if they want more output.

If they try to change working conditions between contracts, you can simply say that violates the contract and they need to bargain at the next one. Whilee facility is unsafe and a lot of our equipment doesn't work, making the job very hard to do.

PS this may just be a ploy for layoffs

The facility is unsafe and a lot of our equipment doesn't work, making the job very hard to do.

This is a commom thing to bargain and very difficult for them to argue without giving you fodder to strike. "They won't even make X safe! They think your life/hand/eyes aren't worth a few thousand dollars!"

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

Good stuff! It's helping me narrow down what we can reasonably bring to the table next week

[-] Chana@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

Nice! What do you mean by "bring to the table next week"?

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

We have a meeting with both the union rep and the owner (different meetings) next week.

Might all be moot for me though because I just had a good interview at a different bakery today. I had the interview lined up before everything blew up at my job. It would be a pay cut but also a stress cut. No matter how the union thing shakes out, it's still going to be a soulless bread factory with miserable workers, so I'm kind of thinking about pulling the rip cord just for my own sanity.

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

I wonder if you are in what's called a hot shop.

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

I'll Google it. I'm not familiar with that term

[-] Chana@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Ah, nice.

If you are interested, you can always continue organizing a previous workplace. Most meetings happen outside workplace hours and there is a lot of planning work to do.

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

I'm a little interested. The job I just interviewed for won't get me to retirement. I would be interested in pivoting to working for union organization some day

[-] Chana@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Depending on which union you associate with it can be possible to turn your organizing experience into a position at that union (obviously I can't say much with certainty). Especially if you perform well or your workplace is large / has potential for expansion. For example, your workplace was bought out. Maybr there are more bakeries in this company now and you would be the expert at unionizing them. Are you talking with UFCW? Some locals / regional teams are pretty good. UNITE HERE is better but has less money.

[-] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

The people telling you that the union can't get your manager removed are not correct. Unions usually cede management rights to the company but there's absolutely no reason they have to and there's no reason they couldn't demand a manager be removed in negotiations.

[-] Chana@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

There is zero chance you can get, "fire Karen" into a contract. But you can get Karen de facto fired by requiring working conditions that prevent her influence and make her a problem for the company. The company will only care when it is clear she is expensive dead weight, not just because workers complain about her.

Also the worst middle managers are nepo hires.

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Good to know. Honestly just getting her demoted or relegated to office work would be enough for us to get what we want. Maybe we will ask for her to not be in charge of production. She has such a tenuous grip as it is

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 30 points 2 days ago

If you win, that will be a

bean

Conquest of Breadmakers

kropotkin-shining YEAAAAAAAAAH

More seriously though, as a union member here’s my semi-qualified takes on your comrade’s concerns:

We work long, unpredictable hours in a non-climate controlled baking facility. It's often over 100°f in there.

The facility is unsafe and a lot of our equipment doesn't work, making the job very hard to do.

Both the stability of hours and the worksite quality are things you could reasonably get out of a contract. Hell, the union’s lawyers may just straight up be like “these are unsafe conditions, you can address these or we can get OSHA involved.”

Our manager uses her weapons grade incompetence to micromanage us into a state of absolute chaos every day, often to the detriment of the product, which we get blamed for and have to remake.

Unfortunately, getting a manager replaced is not gonna be in scope unless she’s done something criminal or violated EEO laws. At best, maybe some standardizing of practices.

We never know when we are getting a raise, and it's all vibes based numbers anyway. Lower than industry standard.

That’s the central point of any union contract: set rules and schedules for pay raises.

We recently got into a position where a huge company got majority shareholder status and they want us to double our output.

Hard to say what effect unionizing would have on this without knowing the specifics of what they’re looking for.

Major thing I would note, management likes putting up counter offers that sound nice, have upfront perks, but if you run the numbers you’ll find that the workers end up getting less over the life of the contract than the original demand. Be prepared to do the math.

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the input. At the end of the day, I wouldn't mind if the manager stayed in her position, but there need to be standards and practices and follow though on those. A huge problem we have is there are no enforcement mechanisms because we are always short staffed and firing even a shitty worker just makes a little more work for us, and the next person might not be any better.

We aren't necessarily concerned with stopping the company form making more bread. We just need people and equipment. We always get the job done no matter how many people show up or what measures we take with the equipment. It usually turns a 9-10 hour day into a 14-15 hour day because of the bottleneck. They don't care because it gets done and they just assume we can work with nothing at full tilt every day.

The owner that we will be going up against us actually a pretty good guy. I honestly think he's just not aware of a lot of our issues because my manager and her supervisor hide things so they look good. I'd be willing to give it a shot airing our grievances to him, but again, whatever is promised is unenforceable by ourselves

[-] purpleworm@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

The owner that we will be going up against us actually a pretty good guy. I honestly think he's just not aware of a lot of our issues because my manager and her supervisor hide things so they look good. I'd be willing to give it a shot airing our grievances to him

I guess you know better than me, but this seems really suspicious. There are lots of gladhands out there that are really personable (in a more skilled way than just some smiling suburbanite car dealer) and absolute bastards, especially among the owning class. You say there are obvious holes in the concrete floor, has he just never checked in those areas? Would a good person not either do even the most cursory inspections or have an uninterested employee do it for him?

I could be totally wrong, I just wanted to raise the idea.

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

You're right about that. He has to be aware of the holes. They are constantly "being addressed" with half ass fixes that last a day. Another problem is we are so busy and there is no space that the new concrete patches get run over by racks hours after being poured. We can either do the job or fix the concrete as it stands. They won't even shut down for a couple of days just to fix it

[-] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

Management rights are usually ceded to the company by unions. There's absolutely no reason they have to though. A contract could include that managers have to be approved by a bargaining unit. Approving the contract could be conditioned on the termination of a manager. Basically nothing is outside the scope of bargaining.

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

getting a manager replaced is not gonna be in scope

I disagree. In a situation where "a huge company got majority shareholder status" they will have zero loyalty to some low level manager. If the organizing focuses on her, they will drop her like a moldy pickle. Or if they want to be nice, move/promote her elsewhere. But honestly I think she'll just get canned.

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

This is something I think we could get done extracurricularly. There have been people coming in to check out the new asset from the parent company and I feel like they might just see it. It's pretty obvious and she's been extra incompetent lately. We are losing a lot of bread and you can tell we are under staffed. Also, there are obvious holes on the concrete floor

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

It’s entirely possible that if the new ownership gets wind of how bad she is, they’ll fire her. But it’s unlikely that they would formally give the union a veto over management picks in the contract.

[-] ufcwthrowaway@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago

Your issues are classic union issues and can absolutely be addressed in a contract!

A sandwich chain up in Seattle won time-and-a-half for whenever the kitchen gets above 82 degrees https://inthesetimes.com/article/working-people-homegrown-sustainable-sandwiches-strike

Some contracts have requirements that the boss has to get the schedule out two weeks in advance and give full-time hours to people with seniority.

Unions also have bully boss trainings about how to push back on bad bosses

All of your grievances are things you guys can address collectively

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

Time and a half for hot days is a great idea. We are considering asking for more pay when people call out as well. So the company has budgeted for x amount of people to work that day. Well there are two call outs a day. Why cant we split that money up? I mean, we have to work 20% harder....

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

alternatively you can try to have them pay 1-2 people (depending on the size of the operation) some amount to be on-call each day and stay in town/sober/not go to the theater who are the designated fill-ins if people call out (or any other reason for unusual workload). this adds some overhead but it makes everything run more smoothly.

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

They tried making us do the "on call" thing until someone pointed out that they had to pay us to be on call. They didn't like that very much and ended the program after a few days

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

lmao yeah that's a well-deserved "fuck you, pay me"

[-] ufcwthrowaway@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Ime having someone being paid to be a substitute (even if it means losing staffing) is better because then management isnt putting pressure on people to not call out.

Another way to address staffing is to write in hour minimums for employees that are higher than you normally get, that way theres just more people around generally.

The time-and-a-half rule is almost never used because once it was in the contract, manager immediately installed amazing air conditioning

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Hour minimums are a good idea. There are too many people that take advantage of our less than lax attendance policy and they need to be replaced. The other side of that is just having more bodies. The new company that took us over is bringing in their own HR which is awesome cause the current lady is a racist, mask off toadie for the owner.

[-] ufcwthrowaway@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

HR departments are also more labor law concious and less likely to just fire everyone than random small buisness people, but they're also less likely to be intimidated by threats about ULPs, its a mixed bag

Hell yeah, seize those muffins

[-] Chana@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

I have a good amount of experience with this.

Management wants the process to be slow and for you to be divided. They want to scare people out of supporting the union and to create an anti-union clique that sees a personal benefit in opposing the union. They want to identidy pro-union organizers and try to remove them as employees. It may not be obvious how they try to do this.

The union, i.e. you and your fellow committed workers, wants the process to go fast and with complete solidarity. If you could turn in 80% yes cards (or whatever process you use) tomorrow that would be ideal. Usually it takes a while. You also want to identify supporters and opposers ans try to win undecided people to your side. You need an organizing committee of the committed people ready to do the work of building lists, having conversations, planning and executing actions.

In terms of planning and your role(s), you want to build lists ASAP: a list of every employee in the unit and information about how pro-union they are. The best way is direct conversations with everyone on that list, ideally following a planned script with a direct question like, "if you could change 3 things about this place, what would they be?" Write down the answers and how pro-union they are. If someone is very pro-union ask them to get involved and emphasize how important it is.

Once you have a list, you can gauge your strength and plan how you will get the remainder of undecided people. Use the information about "3 things you would change" to create a concise list of demands and use this to agitate. Make those demands immediately and use management's reaction to win over the undecideds.

Repeat this process until you have enough cards or whatever to get your legal union.

Management will likely retaliate, like firing organizers. This is to intimidate you and remove a yes vote. You want to have as much support as possible from workers to use this as another moment for agitation, to asd it to the list of demands and say how pissed off you are. File legal grievances over this and go to the media over all forms of retaliation. Ideally friendly media like a local alt newspaper or a friendly journalist.

Management will likely hire a union busting firm. Use this to agitate, calling them out for wasting resources rather than improve working conditions.

Management is your enemy and so are those who work with them. Don't share information with them, as a rule. You will probably have a few rats to deal with. Just communicate internally about who can't be trusted.

You can do actions before you have a union and often they are necessary foe forming one. You can do slowdowns, sick outs, walkouts, etc. Keep in mind that you need proper solidarity for this. If a small minority of the most committrd are the only ones participating they will just use this as an excuse to fire and it won't have much impact anyways. Ensure turnout by using lists and getting commitments from every person you invite. Remind every person to attend witg a follow-up conversation.

This is a lot of work. It is much, much easier if you have a large and committed organizing committre. A 5-person organizing committee means 1/5 (or less) work per person. Burnout is frequent if your committee is too small or doesn't do the work.

Plan out how you will innoculate your fellow workers. Innoculation means preparing them for the bullshit management will say and how it is wrong. You also want to preview possible reactions from management but without being doomer - always always emphasize how important this fight is. That it is the only way to get what you deserve.

Always return to your list and your numbers. The moment you have just enough to file, do it. You can keep adding cards etc, but just filing will make management start shifting into a different mode of union busting, namely trying to challenge votes and slow fown contract negotiations. The contract process is basically the same as unionization but you have to follow some rules around negotiation (start with extremely strong demands, strongee than what you actually want, because you will have to compromise) and now you can strike.

I may be forgetting some things. Please feel free to ask any and all questions. You can do this! You deserve better than 100 degree conditions!

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

Sounds like we are on the right path. I appreciate all the advice though. This is not something I have much experience in and it's going to be hard to get everyone on the same page. The culture of the workplace is we can't even talk about how bad things are. You can get a word in once in a while if you check the room and make sure you're alone with the person.

I've been asking people what they think about unionizing and it's been mostly positive with a few non committal responses. I think once the ball really gets rolling, people won't be afraid to stand up. Plus, watching all the white collars go mask off about this is certainly radicalizing

[-] Chana@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago

I'm glad you're getting positive responses! That's a good way to begin building your committee. Are you writing down who responded and how they responded? Be sure to do this.

At these early steps you want to build that committee, begin mapping out your workplace with lists and organizing tasks, and recruiting workers with social influence. For example, if there is a beloved longtimer, having them be explicitly pro-union and maybe even on the organizing committee is a serious boon. Those noncommital people may become pro-union just because they trust the longtimer.

Regarding the culture of not talking about these things, this is common. The remedy is to have meetings outsids of work. For some meetings you'll want a 1 on 1 meeting (or 2 on 1), like at a coffee shop. For others you'll want to invite a small group. I recommend starting with the 1 on 1s to identify people who would be good on an organizing committee and to ask the "if you could change 3 things" question. Build your list and a committee with one set of actions.

[-] BobDole@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

Are you in contact with any larger/established unions? I am only familiar with the IWW. They can help by putting you in contact with an External Organizer, who you can discuss strategies with. However, it sounds like you’re already very far along in the organizing process, so great job getting to where you are.

My main suggestion is to have your demands agreed upon before the meeting with management. You need something that the manager you’re talking to has the power to change, and you need to be unified. This can be your chance to get a win to reinvigorate the organizing process, but the committee has to be ready to use that win to recruit more of your fellow workers, and use it to keep striving for more. You know that the boss is going to do everything they can to undermine you, so you can’t just get a win and stop. (That last bit isn’t for you, I’m sure you know this, but for the other members of the organizing committee)

If you come in with a demand that they have the power to change, and they don’t, then that’s ammunition against the management.

Record every detail of the meeting you can, whether that’s with an audio recording (if you’re in a single party consent jurisdiction) or a union member taking accurate minutes. Cover your ass, because the NLRB isn’t going to fight for you.

After this, be ready for snitches to infiltrate. Only let people attend organizing meetings who have proven themselves loyal with actions.

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

I'm worried about snitches. More to the point, I'm worried that a few select people will run their mouth and go rogue. There's one person I used to be friends with there that is trying soooo hard to get into "the club" of the people who get all the fruits of our labor, but she will never be allowed in. She can't keep a secret for more than an hour or so and I've tested this. We also have a guy that is all piss and vinegar but he's not good at playing his cards close to his chest, and he's one of those "shoot for the moon" guys that is totally going to blow our credibility.

We plan on demanding a yearly sit down to renegotiate. Things change quick enough around here that we could make pretty substantial gains every year

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] normal_user@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The boss wants to sit down with us troublemakers, and we figure we might as well. It's not going to sway us from our goal, if anything, it will be another chance to slap the boss around again.

Actually I have to say that when I tried to unionize my office togheter with some collegues (we were in the very early stages of trying to figure what we needed to do), the manager requested a meeting with all of us "troublemakers" (only the ones they knew where getting involved in lamenting the low wages) and I have to say that (after a group meeting and some individual meetings) they succeeded in stopping, at least for the time, the "energy" of the movement. Some people just didn't feel anymore like "risking" it.

So, I guess my suggestion is to be careful about who goes in what meeting, especially in the very early stages, because some people might chicken out, and then other people might see those people and feel like unionizing is going too far.

Because of this, we had to stop at getting a small wage increase for our team alone, and now, only after a year, is some of that energy, to do something about the wage and the workplace, coming back.

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

That's what I'm afraid of. Our core group is like five people. If I had my way, I would kick one guy out of the group right now. He's too mouthy and doesn't know what he's talking about. I brought up my concern with the rest of the group and they all agreed. The next step there is to squeeze him out while still listening to him

[-] Chana@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

PS: do not go to that meeting. Do not, as a rule, do anything management wants.

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

We have them by the short hairs. We could just walk out of the meeting the second it becomes about anything but our demands.

The owner rolled over and showed us his soft white belly at the meeting.

[-] Chana@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago

Keeping it to demands is good.

I'm not sure what you mean by the owner rolling over but in early stages management usually tries to appear friendly and nice so they can delay, hire union busters, and try to convince the workers that they don't need a union. Sometimes organizers interpret this as weakness but it is actually an often-successful social ploy. I've seen unions get decertified with this tactic.

If you do this meeting, high turnout is essential and so is making popular demands that management will balk at. Management is never your audience, they are the enemy. Your fellow workers are your audience: those already committed need energy and those unsure need to become committed. You are in a race to get cards signed.

If you don't already have cards signed, this would be a good moment to ask for voluntary recognition. If they refuse (99% chance they refuse), you get as many people to sign cards as possible in your immediate follow-up session / as people leave.

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

what would happen if

  1. the incompetent manager was fired
  2. one of the pro-union was promoted to her job
[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The short answer is things would run more smooth and the person I have in mind would actually stand up to the boss.

Sorry for the following wall of text but it's something I left out of the OP and it's kind of crucial to understanding our problem. TLDR at bottom

So when the bakery started twenty odd years ago, our current GM was like 18 and just got a job there. She hung in there over ten years working her way up the "blue collar" side of things. I met her around this time because I came in for an interview and got the job, but the guy who hired me didn't tell her I was coming in. I walked in and there was my future GM basically doing the job I do now. She eventually ended up in the office when we expanded enough to actually need office workers. The GM at the time was a tough man. Not unreasonable but his job was to keep the status quo because it was making money and projecting growth. He quit eventually and my current GM kind of stepped into that role.

They created a new position between GM and the rest of us and burdened that person beyond any normal persons capacity. Current GM used to do it, now it's the incompetent woman.

Current GM (understandably) has an axe to grind against men because of the way she was treated when she was coming up. She has a habit of promoting women to jobs even if they don't have what it takes, and is over critical of a lot of the men that I work with. I always hesitate to talk about this because it sounds so Incel and MAGA coded, but it's an observable thing that a lot of people have expressed to me over the years. I bring it up, because she promoted my current supervisor because she felt bad for her financial situation, and she was capable of keeping things running pretty smooth when she wasn't over burdened. Well, she got the promotion and her whole attitude changed. Suddenly this person who used to ask me for advice about how to treat the bread (I have 15 years experience, she has two) was making bad calls and focusing more on subordination instead of what was good for the dough. Now we're here where she doesn't know jack squat but has the ego of a monarch.

There was a two year period where neither me or the current GM worked there, and one of the guys who is working on the union project was in charge. He would be a great person on the production floor. He's not in charge anymore because the first GM quit her new job and came back to the bakery and got her old role back and everyone else just had to deal.

TLDR: if we could get rid of the production manager and install the guy who used to do it, thing would run better, but we would likely still be abandoned by management and have no benefits. Incompetent manager probably will never be fired because of favoritism

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

So you think someone is doing their own little affirmative action program. But then kind of leaving the hire out to dry in a job they are not prepared for. Your instinct to avoid focusing on that is correct. Instead talk about general worker control, input, democracy. How should managers get selected? Hiring committee? General vote? Or a role that everyone rotates through? How can your collective imagine an accountable manager? Someone who isn't perfect but works for you to do a required oversight role?

My question wasn't about what would happen on the job production-wise, but what would happen with your organizing? Getting rid of a long-hated boss is a major victory that makes everyone breathe a sigh of relief. Finding a new manager could take weeeks/months, and getting to know them even longer. During that time your bosses will be conducting an anti-union campaign. Out of your committee, you should ask each person how they would react, then how they think specific other people would react. Will they wait to give the new manager the benefit of the doubt?

Note I am just talking about the manager but it could be the same story with any other issue. Your committee has to plan for concessions as well as repression.

Speaking of your committee, how often do you meet? Out of the total workforce, how many have ever attended and how many regularly attend?

[-] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I see what you're saying. If she just disappeared, things would probably run more smoothly. Three of us on the committee run our respective departments or at least share the responsibility. There are enough people who are good at what they do that we don't need supervision of the job itself. What we need is support between us and the office. Support between us and bad coworkers.

The committee would probably assume the leadership roles and share the duties that are now considered one job. I think we would do what we do when the bosses aren't around. We would put the people who do the best job at a station on that job instead of the random crap shoot it is right now. For example, I don't know why we have our best mixer baking the bread when he's slow as hell at it and knows it.

I don't think anyone would miss her if she was demoted or fired. Everyone thinks she's a huge pain in the ass.

I like the suggestion of asking people how we think we should choose a manager or team lead. One of the points I've been trying to get spread around is we should have a say in who we work with. I have worked with sex offenders, people who should be on the sex offenders list and a whole lot more. it takes more than it should to get them fired. Also, it's pretty obvious amongst us who should be doing what roles. I think we would just settle into them. My partner in crime is interested in renegotiating every year so I think between the two of us, we could keep the fire lit. Right now it's about five of us. Ten percent of the workforce, but that's complicated. Some of the delivery drivers live down state, so we never see them. There's workers around the clock, so it's hard to get on the same page. Right now it's day shift production leading the charge.

[-] purpleworm@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

I don't really have experience with this, but basically all the problems you list are extremely normal things for a union to demand (from what I've read), or only abnormal because many businesses are more concerned with violating regulations or opening themselves up to lawsuits than your boss seems to be.

"Fuck you, you're getting us an AC (or whatever device would help)" is really something that you should collectively say in so many words before one of you collapses. Same with any faulty equipment that compromises your safety. This all just being in my uninformed opinion, of course.

[-] baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Start writing diaries.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
112 points (99.1% liked)

chapotraphouse

13967 readers
585 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS