29
We can't be giving homeless people free drinking water when there's golf courses to maintain in the desert /s
It's ridiculous how society treats homeless people like pests
creates them and then treats them like pests.
We need to reinforce our free water at businesses law that made the businesses liable if someone is turned away and suffers injury without water
Not all places have this law, although it probably should be a law everywhere. That said, most businesses are able to skirt it fairly easily by giving away tiny cups of water. Some buy tiny cups just for this purpose and nothing else
In Arizona the water mainly goes to grow alfalfa. In the desert. For the Saudis.
Golf is a surge upon this earth. Wasting water in deserts. Wasting what could be green space in cities
I was homeless in Phoenix in 2008 and it was beyond brutal. The heat was so intense that the soles of my shoes partially melted one day. I used to break into apartment complex pools just to cool down. And then monsoon season is a whole other beast.
And I'm sure it's hotter now than 2008 jesus
We live in a true dystopia. The headlines are so insane as to prompt laughter and tears. I especially like this one from the very next post in my feed:
Suspect in Austin Target shooting that killed 3 people was found naked and holding Bible
What will people who study us 1000 years from now think? The sane ones advanced technology in remarkable ways, yet they allowed the most insane among them to lead their society. They used taxes to help fund miraculous pharmaceutical research, but then allowed private companies to reap all the profits, and to price the drugs beyond what the citizens could afford. They were fully aware of their downfall yet somehow powerless to stop it.
What will people who study us 1000 years from now think?
"Wow, things were like this even back then!"
And people wonder why there are so many homeless people in California.
Is this part of the Chinese hoax?
Ain't that America?! Home of the fee baby!
It will not be a problem for long. Mr. Trump will fix it. The homeless will no longer be in the city, so no chance of heat injury
To be fair, a city in the middle of the desert, where men was not supposed to go, taunting the will of god like Babel, might not be the best place to keep homeless people around.
It's not that someone's "keeping them around." They live there.
You are free to assume that I made a deliberte word choice there, or you can just assume that I mean something sensible with it. Whatever suits you best.
I'm not trying to be dense here, but what sensible thing did you mean?
Fair enough, "sensible" is a very subjective term these days, always has been, but now even more. I mean to not leave people out on the street to die in scolding hot temperatures, but rather arrange for decent emergency shelters and ultimately proffesional help to get people back on their feet, or at least off the street.
Ah, that is sensible. Thanks for clarifying, and I agree. Homelessness is a failure of a community. If the climate is already hostile to people who have shelter, we better make damn sure unhoused people are protected too.
Better arrest them
Arrest and body cam footage and better they be buttery brown so it gets approved so they can really suffer.
Can't provide any relief for this. Without an inherent and unrelenting threat to their lives, homeless people would have no motivation to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. /s
If they didn’t want to be burned by the sidewalk, why did they choose to become homeless?
Instead of helping people, they're villainizing them. Disgusting
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
29 points (96.8% liked)
News
31982 readers
520 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS