137
submitted 1 week ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The majority of the sweeping tariffs Donald Trump imposed during his second term face one final litmus test that will determine whether he can continue to levy them – and also whether businesses are eligible for massive refunds.

That potentially dramatic turn in the tariff saga comes after a federal appeals court ruled on Friday that Trump unlawfully leaned on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose across-the-board duties on countries.

Trump had used those powers to push import tax rates as high as 50% on India and Brazil – and as high as 145% on China earlier this year.

(page 2) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Or else what?

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Increasing the uncertainty is not necessarily beneficial either. Businesses won't want to keep changing their pricing. People don't want to plan their purchases around whether tariffs are likely to change up or down in the future. Their instinct will be to wait.

The tariffs were illegal in how they were implemented but Congress could easily do it and would follow his instructions as they have done before.

It's a shit show, as expected.

[-] teft@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago

Uh congress couldn’t easily implement tariffs though. How would they muster 60 votes in the senate to break the filibuster?

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

You have more faith in the democrats than I do. They won't filibuster tariffs with a shutdown looming that is clearly trumps causing, but they don't want the blame.

[-] lemmysquezzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Can you imagine having to refund ~6 months of US Imports? The paperwork alone would take years. Each entry would have to be re-verified with customs. Not to mention the staffing increase for CBP to process the refunds. I don't see SCOTUS not enforcing this.

[-] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

How far does this refund go? My distributor paid the tarrifs and then passed that cost onto me, which I passed onto my customers.

Will my customers, distributors, or myself be refunded? I assume just my distributor since they directly paid the tarrif. And I doubt prices will come down when tarrifs end, so everything is permanently more expensive for no fucking reason, and the top middle man just boosted his profit margin through the roof.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Eehhh, consumers paid this, not the businesses. This way businesses would essentially get a bonus

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's the point of Republican business support. Remember COVID, where businesses got money to "survive"?

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

how would refund like this even work? Many businesses closed shop entirely due to these tarrifs, could they sue the government too? This would be crazy and this massive overhead risk could block the entire thing.

[-] bigfondue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is why huge policy changes are discussed and planned for years. One guy being able say "Tariffs starting on Monday!" is fucking idiotic.

[-] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yuuuuuup! One of the key parts of planning policies is evaluating its strength in court. SCOTUS gave the executive branch a free pass to just try anything with zero consequences. Why bother asking if something is legal when it literally doesn't matter if it isn't.

[-] aramis87@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago

Turns out either I can't read or can't math.

~~Funny how the refund works out to a total of about 60 cents per American, when I know I've paid WAY more than that in tariff-related bullshit.~~

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blitzen@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

It shouldn’t go back to businesses, it should be a tax credit (with documentation.)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
137 points (99.3% liked)

News

32158 readers
674 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS