It seems to be a regular provoking thing for Pisseral to harss the mosque so I believe it,
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israeli-settlers-pray-al-aqsa-mosque-charlie-kirk
Yes, a delegation of settlers “inflamed tensions” on Sukkot immediately before the Al Aqsa flood in October 2023
i literally do not believe this. wtf. wtf. wtf. wtf. wtf. wtf. wtf. wtf. wtf. wtf. wtf.
This post got removed from lemmy.world because they say trt world is not a reliable source. I can understand that, given turkeys bad press freedoms.
But they are pretty close to the middle east, so they should be somewhat respectable for the wider region than some US sources imo.
Can anyone here help me find a better more moderate source on this. This article itself refers to Hebrew-language site Srugim as the source, would that be moderate enough?
Lemmy.world allows way less reliable news sources so I'd say just move on and stop relying on an unreliable instance. They don't even allow archival links for the purpose of getting around paywalls but permit pay-walled links being posted.
they allow Anadolu ajansı, why not trt world? Why is BBC allowed but not TRT?
It's as legitimate as any US or UK source
I bet it was Jordan Lund again
Shooter was an Israeli trained mk ultra sniper confirmed
It seems domestic US issues even reach Palestines West Bank nowadays.
Charlie Kirk was not a fan of isreal. Or Bibi.
Watching the israel propaganda wash his negative opinion away is wild.
Charlie Kirk was not a fan of isreal
he's one of the biggest simps for israel there was. lately people like candace owens etc are trying to launder his image and claim he was " this - close to turning on israel, which is why they killed him". just trying to cash in on his death, which hey, that's capitalism, can't fault her. but he was definitely a huge fan of israel. he called palestinians "stupid muslims". literally.
he called palestinians "stupid muslims". literally.
For added context to readers, he said this while the genocide was happening and in support of it
Honestly I think the people trying to launder his image are people who agree with him on everything else but also wish he had been anti-Israel, so now they want to tell themselves that this was who he truly was
Ok
Ok
some politically motivated actors are claiming that he was being pressured by donors to reign in any questioning of israel's narrative, but saying he was not a fan of israel is just plain wrong and historically inaccurate. a few private conversations about potential misgivings does not change his decade plus as a zionist propagandist.
Ok
Ok
How are people outside of the Owens - Fuentes sphere still saying this?
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.