3
submitted 6 months ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago

Why the fuck is our supposedly liberal government giving standard ovations to conservative pundits? What do they hope to accomplish by pushing this rhetoric? Right wingers will never see this and think “wow maybe I’ll vote liberal next election” you fucking idiots. I hate everything.

[-] dom@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

That's cause our liberals have been moving further right. Carney himself is pretty much an old school conservative.

[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

15-20 years ago, Carney's platform would be PC, and Polieverre's failed platform would have been a joke.

[-] dom@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

Yup. Exactly. And ndp is just in the corner shitting the bed

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Maybe if all the “strategic voters” had even a little bit of a spine. “I prefer the NDP but I need to vote NDP! Hey, why does the NDP not get any support?!”

How many Canadians flatly refuse to vote for what they believe while being mad that the government isn’t reading their minds? We aggressively signal that we do not want the NDP and then get mad that they aren’t the thing we keep showing them that we do not want. Get a clue.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

Sorry I'm a xis make the current NDP doesn't want me there is no fucking way I'm voting for them.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think you mean “cis male” and holy fuck, brother, you need to get out of whatever nasty echo-chamber you’re in. I’m a cis male, I’m even tall, strong, white, and from a pretty well-off family, and yet I don’t feel the least bit alienated by them. Hell, I once had a firearms license and I drive a sportscar and motorcycles and shit, and I repair things with my own hands. And yet I feel perfectly fine and secure with the NDP platform and messaging. I’m privileged as hell, and I don’t mind losing some of my undeserved advantage so that those without such a headstart can have a better chance. The best part is that I still benefit from those policies, just not directly. When the floor is raised we all do better.

So I guess I’m just curious as to why you would think that they don’t want you.

[-] dom@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

If this is such a systemic problem that it alters elections, the problem is with the system.

The individuals are doing a risk/benefit assessment at a micro level. It is more damaging for them to have a conservative government than it is for them to have a liberal government and that may weigh more to them than the incredibly slim possibility of having an ndp government.

You cant penalize people for picking what is in their best interest. And they can still be pissed off that the best choice they had still led to a shitty outcome.

If you want something different, the system needs to change.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

100% that we need reform, something the Liberals will not give us.

At some point though we have to admit that our system is less one rigged for a specific party at it’s core and more one that benefits the most established party at the time. If we all voted for a different party they would ultimately win. A huge reason why people say they won’t vote NDP is because they claim that the party “doesn’t have a chance”. If they wanted that party to win_before_ voting for them then we deserve everything we get because as a population we’re too fucking stupid for any other outcome.

Also all strategic voting does here is ratchet everything to the right and raises the stake for the following election. We decided to let it go for a while and now all we really have is the center-right and far-right. Congrats to every spineless coward who got us here and screamed loud and clear that what they want to see more of is pathetic corporate centrism.

[-] dom@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

Again, they aren't spineless cowards when their choices are "evil" and "pretty shitty." They are voting for what is best for them.

You can say that they have other choices, but as individuals, they really do not. Any other vote is essentially a vote for "evil"

Look what happened down south. You think those people who voted for Jill Stein are happy that trump got in?

[-] Soup@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

The States have a two-party system and because in their primaries they completely fuck it up every time, including plenty of corruption from the democratic party itself, they got to where they are. This is what we need to avoid, but we’re too busy looking at our feet as we walk towards a similar fate.

That said, we aren’t in the US, we’re in Canada, in case you weren’t aware. Our biggest issue is that the NDP can get half the votes that the Liberals got in 2019 and more than them in 2021 yet we see seat splits of 157 to 24 and 160 to 25. Flip your example around, and can you imagine how many people who voted “strategically” helped cause their ridings to lose out on NDP candidates? People claim they have no chance as if the country doesn’t want them but millions upon millions do. And then today we’re still all fucking miserable, a shithead banker is in charge, and the one party that fought for us(and actually got shit done when they put a gun to the Liberals with the coalition) lost pretty much everything.

We must really hate ourselves, to constantly fall for this bullshit. Conservatives AND Liberals are suffocating this country; do you want to let it die while pretending you’re doing the right thing or do want to actually do the bare fucking minimum and vote for the party whose platform actually aligns with your views?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Propaganda works, y’all. It’s serious.

[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Why are my tax dollars being used to give a racist, bigot, fascist and all around waste of human life a standing ovation?

This is utterly ridiculous to a country as diverse as Canada that I would think overwhelmingly disagrees with the hate Kirk spewed out of his filthy pie hole.

They want to mention that political views shouldn’t turn violent, great. But don’t waste my money on mourning an absolutely horrific person with a standing ovation. This pathetic human doesn’t deserve anything except that grave he’s now being dumped into.

[-] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

Read the article, title is clickbait.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

They could have made the speech without mentioning him or mentioning others. How come no speech when two Democrats politicians shot? How come only when some conservative asshole who isn't even a politician?

[-] Alloi@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

can we stop applauding nazis in parliment for gods sake.

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I hope somebody is keeping a list of all these people because it's straight up a list of fascists.

[-] BenNoodling@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

The liberals did not give a standing ovation to charlie kirk. It was performative political theatre from the cons. A conservative MP made a statement praising kirk, framing kirk as a beacon of family values. The liberals could rise to support those values or remain sitting and be accused of supporting political violence. It was a no win situation set up by the cons. The next day the libs had a "standing ovation". If you are outraged by the story ask yourself who wins from your outrage.

[-] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If I hear anyone ranting about family/traditional values Im just going to cut to the chase and assume you consume Russian origin propaganda by the barrel-load. Nobody pushes that stuff harder than them. No one stands to gain from the chaos it creates in the west, more than them.

[-] Bonus@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Why the F does anyone in Canada think they need to capitulate to the absolute worst of America? This is beyond pathetic.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago
[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

This is fucking embarrassing.

[-] Candid_Andy@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago
[-] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

You cannot be a good person and a nazi, you are still a nazi.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

Of course he isn't a good person, he is a fucking Nazi and deserved what he got

I think the point is that just about everybody who thinks this was a good guy is like a Christian; they've only been fed the positive parts and blurps, and are wholly ignorant of the dark side of the subject because they were never shown what it really was about

I think we need to continue posting his real messages

[-] dirigibles@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

What is with all this 'deserved what he got' insanity? I know it's the internet and all, but calm down. He was a person, flawed just like the rest of us. He had views that many of us found disagreeable, just like everyone else.

Black people are upset that he died, gay people are upset that he died, trans people are upset that he died; why? Because he wasn't some evil extremist calling for violence. He was a moderate and calling for debate.

Where is all this hate towards Kirk coming from? And please don't cherry pick a handful of out of context quotes. There are thousands of hours of video discrediting all these random quotes people are using to showcase his villainy.

[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Misleading title. Yes, Charlie Kirk's assassination sparked a conversation about the importance of free speech and disavowing political violence. The standing ovation was not for Charlie, but for the outcome of that speech.

Still, you'd think they'd at least TRY to be reasonable with the optics of the conversation.

[-] teemrokit@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

But isn't what Kirk did constitute as hate speech here in Canada. We don't have freedom of speech, we have freedom of expression.

He didn't deserve to die but he was toxic in every sense of the word.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

There was two mentions of Charlie Kirk, in a speech that I'd say was focused on condemning political violence, in a mostly non-partisan way. I'd like to think that in Canada we're above using weapons to prove a point. If we need to beat back the intolerant we'll do it in an enormous show of non-violent force like Torontonians just did at Christie Pits.

https://toronto.citynews.ca/2025/09/15/police-outline-charges-after-numerous-arrests-at-opposing-immigration-rallies-at-christie-pits/

Anyway the speech is what I'd expect from a Conservative, but it's nuanced enough that I get behind the primary message being conveyed.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

That all said, those celebrating Kirk's death are as much simply expressing themselves as Charlie Kirk was, when he was denigrating immigrants and those that didn't fit the ideal Aryan description

And we should also publicly denounce people threatening journalists and professionals like Rachel Gilmore, who had been simply lamenting the appetite for escalation that would come from those seeking retribution, but this was wildly interpreted as a celebration and now is facing a constant barrage of death threats. Which only proved her point btw.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Does anyone know what's going on in this context? Is this a part of the trade negotiations or something?

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

It’s part of Carney and the shitlibs sucking the US and Trump off, elbows down you might say. Capitulation, praise and acquiescence is their modus operandi. They have no intention of standing up for Canada, it’s all been lies.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
3 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11769 readers
632 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS