89
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by xiaohongshu@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Source

Usually, they only censor the explicit content. But this is the first time that AI tools were used to directly alter the content of the original film.

By the way, the film has been withdrawn from a wide release in China after receiving too many complaints.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RedSturgeon@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

Capitalism will replace you with AI if they think it will make more sales, absolutely, that is also still an issue in China ofc. Very sad to see, would like to see such actions be followed by a swift response of the people's representatives. Also could you please specify who censored the movie in the title? When you just say a country that means the government mandates this I would assume.

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago
[-] Mindfury@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

Hey, so I was out all yesterday and completely missed this thread and ensuing light struggle session but I'll give some additional context as I know it:

The writer & director had no fucking idea lmao, he was completely blindsided by the changes and only found out when journalists in China (as to who they work for, no idea soz) started asking him questions about editing the cut and sent him basically the same screenshot (i think from a different platform, caption was different but it's the exact same comparison screenshot of the film). He first found out on the 15th. There are some other funny edits, such as additional steam vfx blurring Dave Franco's bare ass in the shower scene and some others he hasn't dropped in the group chat.

Seems like the producers & Neon people were claiming to have had no idea either, as they all apparently went straight to the lawyers after a day or so and were basically asking Michael to make the decision on whether to completely pull from China or not as they had 'clear breaches' of contracts and literal 'admissions' that the film had been altered without consent. At this point he's not making any additional money on where it's being distributed, so allowing him the decision to completely pull it and lose someone millions seems like an admission that someone fucked up/gambled wrong.

Without having read the thread for any investigation on the intricacies of film distribution in China, I can only go off a conversation we had last week when we were halfway to getting decently drunk and watching Salo at a cinema on Wednesday night. It seems like he's been told by various legal people/producers that this happens a bit - The distributors buy it and just make changes without authorisation to seemingly pre-empt the ratings/censor's office and hope that the hollywood crackers either never find out or care. As to whether it is a case of pre-alteration before submission to the gov, changes made by the gov / requested alterations, or even a sneaky recut provided to the chinese distributor without the director's knowledge, I can't say for sure. There seemed to be some suggestions that Michael's legal could demand that some alterations be reversed and have the distributor resubmit the film, which lends a bit of credence to the idea that distributors just fucking do this but go too far, self-censoring beyond necessity before even seeking gov approval or a film rating/classification.

Either way, the whole thing was a bit overshadowed by his second film being greenlit, but he was legitimately pissed at the alterations and now having to make a choice where he could be perceived as throwing LGBTQIA+ people under the bus for money (when he makes no additional money whatsoever from the film being distributed anywhere) or being seen as sinophobic and getting no traction in China ever again if he pulls it or blames anyone in China for the issue.

unrelated, but apparently the film was doing quite well in russia.

[-] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the update. This explains a lot and tracks with what I have read from the Chinese internet.

Unfortunately there are some that tried to blame it on the producers, but your explanation pretty much clarified and tracked with what I have said in this thread.

Anyway, the film has been withdrawn from a wide theatrical release due to receiving too much complaints, so I guess they won’t have to deal with it anymore.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Unrelated to the thread but shoutout @Mindfury@hexbear.net who was housemates with the director of this film loll

[-] leftAF@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Maybe if they're still in touch we can get the full story on this!

[-] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Yeah they should clarify. People are saying that the producers did this, but from my understanding, this is a buyout/acquisition film which means the importer with regional distribution rights has the liberty to do its own censorship, while the film producers have nothing to do with it once the rights are sold. Unlike the revenue-sharing films where the rights were mostly retained by the producers and they have to work with the censorship.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mindfury@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

Ayo! So I was out all yesterday and completely missed this thread and ensuing light struggle session but I'll give some additional context as I know it:

The writer & director had no fucking idea lmao, he was completely blindsided by the changes and only found out when journalists in China (as to who they work for, no idea soz) started asking him questions about editing the cut and sent him basically the same screenshot (i think from a different platform, caption was different but it's the exact same comparison screenshot of the film). He first found out on the 15th. There are some other funny edits, such as additional steam vfx blurring Dave Franco's bare ass in the shower scene and some others he hasn't dropped in the group chat.

Seems like the producers & Neon people were claiming to have had no idea either, as they all apparently went straight to the lawyers after a day or so and were basically asking Michael to make the decision on whether to completely pull from China or not as they had 'clear breaches' of contracts and literal 'admissions' that the film had been altered without consent. At this point he's not making any additional money on where it's being distributed, so allowing him the decision to completely pull it and lose someone millions seems like an admission that someone fucked up/gambled wrong.

Without having read the thread for any investigation on the intricacies of film distribution in China, I can only go off a conversation we had last week when we were halfway to getting decently drunk and watching Salo at a cinema on Wednesday night. It seems like he's been told by various legal people/producers that this happens a bit - The distributors buy it and just make changes without authorisation to seemingly pre-empt the ratings/censor's office and hope that the hollywood crackers either never find out or care. As to whether it is a case of pre-alteration before submission to the gov, changes made by the gov / requested alterations, or even a sneaky recut provided to the chinese distributor without the director's knowledge, I can't say for sure. There seemed to be some suggestions that Michael's legal could demand that some alterations be reversed and have the distributor resubmit the film, which lends a bit of credence to the idea that distributors just fucking do this but go too far, self-censoring beyond necessity before even seeking gov approval or a film rating/classification.

Either way, the whole thing was a bit overshadowed by his second film being greenlit, but he was legitimately pissed at the alterations and now having to make a choice where he could be perceived as throwing LGBTQIA+ people under the bus for money (when he makes no additional money whatsoever from the film being distributed anywhere) or being seen as sinophobic and getting no traction in China ever again if he pulls it or blames anyone in China for the issue.

unrelated, but apparently the film was doing quite well in russia.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

It's weird that some of the most successful media coming out of China is extremely gay coded, like Ne Zha 2 earlier this year, but they're still trying to censor gay stuff.

[-] Sasuke@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

As somewhat of a BL gourmand, I was under the impression that they must've been relaxing the censorship around LGBT content lately, but I guess maybe they get around it by not releasing their shows on Chinese platforms? Either way, some of the most popular BLs this year have been Chinese, including the world's first live-action Omegaverse BL (and yes, the boys do get pregnant!).

[-] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Web series usually don’t go through censorship, otherwise the poor staff in the department would be completely overwhelmed lol. It’s mostly release on movie theaters and public television channels that require the proper license and censorship approval.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

The world's first live action Omegaverse BL was Star Trek The Original Series Season 2, Episode 1 "Amok Time." Unfortunately neither boy got pregnant in that one.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

China does unfortunately have top privilage from my understanding. Masc4masc is what Mao would have wanted possibly. Or not, I am only guessing based on my rednote feed.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
89 points (92.4% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14118 readers
696 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS