421

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Unified (www.smbc-comics.com)

submitted 4 days ago by otters_raft@lemmy.ca to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] vateso5074@lemmy.world 60 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I almost kinda dislike the messaging on this one because it implies authoritarianism is the key to discovery. Scientists are implied to be passive and unindustrious when left alone, so the government (FBI-type characters) declare a truth they want proven, force development of it through the threat of violence, and it eventually yields an answer they're happy with.

I'm reminded of the film The Death of Stalin and it's depiction of the USSR's treatment of bourgeois intellectuals like doctors.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago

I interpreted the opposite; once they were freed from day to day bullshit, they were able to reach new discoveries the way 20th century hiking scientists

[-] vateso5074@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

That's how I read the intent of the author, at least. Getting scientists out of their isolated bubbles and allowing them to actually experience the world drives innovation.

That, or the one physicist who figured it out was so traumatized by merely being outside that she figured it out as quickly as possible to make it all stop, haha.

[-] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 76 points 4 days ago

I guess that's the joke - this is so stupid and obviously won't work, but that perspective is subverted when it turns out to actually work, causing humour.

I quite like it.

[-] vateso5074@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Fair, I guess I'm just letting the world get to me!

[-] hobovision@mander.xyz 8 points 3 days ago

Read more SMBC, it might help! Or give you more anxiety. But at least you'll be smiling.

[-] JohnAnthony@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago

My interpretation was that pink lady shouted out some crap formula FBI guy does not understand anyway so they would be left alone again.

Last panel half contradicts it, half just leans harder into the absurdity of it all. I wouldn't expect physicists to care much about Rubik's Cubes, I think even the cliché fits mathematicians much better.

Basically, my spontaneous takeaway was "government and media are so science-illiterate that nobody understands anyone anymore".

[-] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

Your argument collapses once you consider spaghetti.

Left alone, spaghetti just lies there, limp and purposeless. Only through firm, boiling authority does it reach al dente perfection. Scientists, like noodles, sometimes need that structured heat to avoid sticking together in chaos. Maybe the government isn’t crushing freedom but just straining out the excess sauce of indecision.

After all, nobody eats raw noodles in a democracy of boiling water.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

that's a great film. it's on my annual watch list, will update the date i watch it on when appropriate.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"Knapsack?" That is a bindle, you Philistine!

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Thank you kind lexical hero.

[-] Damaskox@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Is it just me or is the whole comic image too blurry to ready any of the text?

EDIR: Oh, there's a HD button

[-] ImWaitingForRetcons@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

I take umbrage with the idea that gravity is necessarily quantisable- for all we know, it can’t be quantised.

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 days ago

ugg fiiine you can try to gravitize quantum mechanics, if you really must

[-] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Nah, quantum fields all rest on another dimensional layer. The quantum foam experiences a weak cohesion force that doesnt drop off with distance. This results in clustering of the foam, resulting in clustering of the deeper field. This is emergent on the macroscopic scale as the folding of space time, which is really just the tendancy of energy to condense on the quantum scale.

Or maybe partical interactions being dependant on locality results in a sort of local energy spike as the two particles get closer. This results in time dilation between the two particles, altering the expected rate at which their interactions would occur, effectively setting a hard limit on how close two particles can get without fusing. This time dilation could also be responsible for the emergent property of gravity. Kinda like how doubling the passage of time effectively doubles the measured heat in a volume, given that heat is a measure of particle interactions per second. Twice the seconds, twice the interactions. If time gets fucky when two particals get close enough to interact, that could result in an illusionary force that emerges macroscopically as gravity.

This is all me fucking around but i think theres maybe a nugget of legit speculation in there

[-] icelimit@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

I understood some of these words

[-] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

My theory runs as follows:

Take two partcles, and measure the energy found in both if them and the space between them. It is my speculation that as they get closer, the energy in the space between them raises. It follows that with higher energy in a smaller area, the curvatureof spacetime would be warped, explaining the differance in expected values between quantum and relativity.

Basically im saying an oversight caused a math error.

I am not a quantum physicist and i only study it as a hobby, this is almost definitely not the actual solution

[-] icelimit@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

But energy is quantized. By your explanation, distance should also be quantized as a consequence.

Or distance might not be actually quantized, just that we can't place things in between like the pieces on a chess set.

[-] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Is distance not quantized? It was my understanding that the planc length was the "grid size" of the universal array, so to speak.

That being said, gravity as we detect it is not confirmed to be quantized, which is where the confusion comes in. That implies that there is a fundamental factor that is non quantized, possibly with other factors that may be quantized. What I'm getting at here is that while energy is definitely quantized, gravity may be a product of energy/distance, with distance being non quantized, resulting in non quantized gravity.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

yeah, "can", "the", "and", this makes sense

[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 days ago

Sounds like someone needs to go for a walk

[-] icelimit@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Is gravity originates from an interaction of mass and distance, and both are quantized, doesn't it necessarily follow that gravity is also quantized?

Disclaimer: I am not a physicist.

[-] ImWaitingForRetcons@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

We actually don’t know if distance is quantised- while distances smaller than the Planck length don’t make any sense with our current understanding of physics, that doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s the quantum of distance.