The box that is labeled XP should be labeled 2000.

when any new fact is learned, the learning entity has “discovered” it. Europeans thought they were going to India, and discovered that there was something else there. They also discovered there were people there, and never pretended that there weren’t.

You have to twist the common meaning of the word to make it mean “intentionally erasing existing inhabitents.

It's really incredible how Microsoft is trying to drive people away, by:

• Polluting what works.

• Never actually finishing revamps in progress.

• Pushing so much crap even normal users are conditioned to click Microsoft 'features' away as spam.

They don't have to do anything! They could just freeze Windows 11 and gut development beyond security/api/hardware fixes, and rake in business "stuck on win32" dollars for eternity. But no, they are trying their absolute best to push folks to Android/iOS and open a window for stuff like the steam deck.

I bet we aren't far from OEMs even getting sick of it, as shipping (admittedly, trashy self made) linux distros.

I thought 10 was a decent OS once debloated, used it for a while.

Back to Linux now though.

Windows peaked at 7, I only moved to Windows 10 when Windows 7 lost support

I remember when we were a Unix shop (BSD & Linux) sharing space with guys writing code for some kind of printing software (for professional printing shops that did complex format conversions) that apparently absolutely had to be on Windows (because, unclear reasons, nobody would buy a non Windows printing management box, or something).

Anyway, they were writing for one of the early versions of NT, maybe 2000, not sure, and were pulling their hairs out the whole time we were with them.

A classic I remember was "the system will just decide that our driver (pretty much the only thing running) isn't that important, and dump it's priority to the shitter. Once it's there, it's dead in the water and we can't get it active again without physical intervention. We've been talking to Microsoft for weeks to get around this."

I suppose this has been more or less addressed by Microsoft nowadays, but, of course, this kind of thing hasn't been an issue in unixland, like ever. Because it's a system that fucking makes sense. And about the versions of Windows, I stopped using their stuff in the DOS days, so it's not like I even have an opinion.

(and yes, they did have a couple very high end developers, on top of the regular grunts)

I miss windows millennium, which would be a hammer made of a turd.

Windows 12+...

This is why I am on linux.

The plain old basic hammer probably should have been Windows 2000, and then a big playskool plastic stuff slapped on for XP, but ultimately pretty much exactly the same.

Where the fuck is Windows 2000 Advanced Server? The shiniest turd of them all

Win ME is the 98 image but the rock is on the smaller branch

What about Windows ME? - the best version of classic windows.

At least you can despyware 10...

You forgot windows me.

I know it would throw off the whole 9 square thing but if you (or the person that created this) decide to add it then might I recommend a hammer smashing itself into pieces?

Why skip 95 and put a blank in for 9. Windows 95/98 are the reason why there is no windows 9. Far too many lazy programmers make software and drivers that abbreviated to windows9 because there were two versions. Still nice try, I guess.

Windows 9 looks nice, I'll take that one