17
submitted 6 months ago by xc2215x@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Jestzer@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The program excludes creators terminated for copyright infringement

Because that’s just unforgivable. /s

[-] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

Don't you know it's just for neonazis to appease the President?

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

Jfc. I thought this might be in response to the whole Gamers Nexus thing, and Google finally recognizing that it’s trivial to weaponize their copyright strike system against anyone’s channel.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

of course, only shitty AI is allowed to do that

[-] db2@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

"Nothing tastes as good as boot in the morning" - Google

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago

YouTube’s ‘second chance’ process fits with a broader trend at Google and other major platforms to ease strict content moderation rules imposed in the wake of the pandemic and the 2020 election.

Oh goody, we're going to get a whole new wave of far-right videos on YouTube.

[-] noride@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

If I had to guess, YouTube video uploads are down or at least stalling, and this is an easy way to juice the numbers before the next quarter. Content is content, after all, and line must go up.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I thought they were churning out AI slop videos to keep up?

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 months ago

The problem with that is there's no moat. Anyone can just do that industrial quantities same as you

[-] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Apparently ban has a different meaning than it used to. I keep seeing dramatic posts about Who-Gives-Shit influencer getting banned from somewhere. The next day or two I see another post about how they're back.

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

People have been dropping the preceding adjective. It used to be that temp bans were handed out for first violations or accumulated minor violations, with the severity of the violation dictating whether it was a temporary ban of hours, days, weeks, or months.

Really egregious violations, or a pattern of temp bans not changing the users behavior would trigger a permanent ban.

I also hate the use of “ban” alone to mean temporary. The default use of “ban” should, does, mean permanent. If it’s temporary, it should be specifically conditionalized as such. I don’t really know when this started or how we got here, but it’s fucking annoying.

[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago
[-] dumbass@aussie.zone 4 points 6 months ago

Fascist ~~sympathizers.~~

[-] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

This feels like Twitter all over again

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 1 points 6 months ago

I wonder what their motivation is. Just a good old change of heart, giving everyone a 2nd chance or possibly something else?

[-] dan1101@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

Possibly something else.

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 6 months ago

They're trying to win back the rumble crowd.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84041 readers
935 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS