20
submitted 5 months ago by lemmyknow@lemmy.today to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Better do it like the old Greeks: they voted twice. Once to get someone into office, and once at the end of the term whether to banish him or not.

[-] IWW4@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 months ago

Elections would take 10,000 years.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

There is a system that does exactly this, everyone puts the candidates in their preferred order, and a computer just does the "rounds".

Probably the best way ever, because you end up with the least disliked choice. IIRC. We closed places at work with a system like this, went very well.

[-] dgriffith@aussie.zone 8 points 5 months ago

Australian here, this is how our voting system works. My method is literally putting the most repulsive politician last and then working my way up until I get to the least-repulsive.

Politicians dropped from the rounds can nominate another politician of similar views to give their votes to, so eventually the whole thing coalesces into politicians from three or four parties getting elected, but still gives the opportunity for minor parties to become major parties should the standing government of the day really piss people off.

[-] cdzero@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

It's a great system. Worth just clarifying that the "nominating" is just the candidate suggesting who to put which numbers next to, not actually them saying who the runoff vote goes to.

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

But that's still voting for your preferred candidates. The OPs proposal is like doing tribal council from the Survivor TV show but for our government.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

No, you submit an ordered list from most preferred to least preferred. The computer then calculates how the TV show would have ejected them one after another.

Of course, you wouldn't get influenced by the TV show etc.

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Good point. Let's make it more efficient!

Everybody gets one vote and one veto.

You can vote for anyone, even yourself, but if a single person vetos you, you're out.

Add up the votes, remove everybody with vetos, and there you go!

[-] Broadfern@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

This is how we end up with a dog president and honestly I’m okay with that.

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

That’s how instant runoff voting works (assuming you’re still starting with a small list of candidates).

[-] anugeshtu@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Or just let them compete on an island which gets smaller and smaller until there's just one person standing!

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 0 points 5 months ago

HUNGER GAMES style.

[-] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago

I guess it would lead to politicians being even more sycophantic before elections to not exhibit any possible trait that could be seen as negative.
Not a good system, I think.

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I don't trust anyone TOO perfect. Eliminate him!

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 5 months ago

Do we send the candidates off to a desert island to survive for a couple weeks while this is happening?

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It's a fun thought experiment. I'm going to cop out and say I just wish my country had more than Republican and Republican Lite to vote for.

[-] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

Doesn't the US have more than two options?

[-] collapse_already@lemmy.ml -2 points 5 months ago

My solution to politics: if 50,000 people vote that we should execute you, we execute you. Pretty soon there would be no politicians left.

[-] Artisian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

As a sudden change that does something. I'm less excited about the steady state. I think nobody does anything publicly that could get attention, because being known gets you killed with surprisingly high probability.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38626 readers
243 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS