451
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 38 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

With Linux, I can change just about everything. If I want a real-time kernel, I can switch. If I want a different desktop environment, change. If I want more control from my keyboard, Linux has my back.

As much as I agree with the sentiment of the article, this is a terrible reason and more likely to scare people away from Linux rather than get them to install it.

If you know what a "real-time kernel" is, you're probably already using Linux and you are a highly technically literate user. Any "normal person" user is going to look at that and think "Oh, I guess I need to understand technobabble in order to use Linux". Normal users care about easy, preset defaults, not customization.

Once again, Linux adoption is kneecapped by its own users, who forget what normal people really care about.

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Linux adoption is kneecapped by its own users, who forget what normal people really care about.

Yep. My primary goal has always been: 'It just works'. I'm fairly techy, but I don't want to fix shit constantly.

What finally got me to switch was Windows no longer 'just working'. Every update was another assault that required active effort on my part. PiHole, debloating, O&O Shutup, etc, etc. This coupled with Steam bringing Linux gaming into the prime-time, means the OS that most resembles 'is just works' is no longer Windows.

For most users, Linux just works. That is the angle that should be pushed. Particularly right now there is a massive opportunity to swap your family members over. No reason for Gran to throw away her facebook machine just because it doesn't like Windows 11. Throw Mint on there, point her to the Firefox icon, and she is good to go!

[-] Mihies@programming.dev 32 points 3 months ago

Security: Linux doesn't need antivirus, just don't install infected software. Riiiight? Sorry, but this is silly.

[-] addie@feddit.uk 50 points 3 months ago

Centrally managed repositories help a lot, here. Linux users tend not to download random software off of sketchy websites; it's all installed and kept up to date via the package manager.

Yes, Linux malware and viruses exist, and we shouldn't pretend otherwise. The usual reason for installing Linux virus scanners is because you're hosting a file/email server, and you want to keep infected files away from Windows users, tho.

[-] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Linux users tend not to download random software off of sketchy websites;

Search for "sudo curl ...... | sh" and let me know how many hits you get.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Mihies@programming.dev 8 points 3 months ago

Even package managers are vulnerable to many security problems - can they guarantee that apps are not infected either directly or indirectly (through a library)? There is also flathub. Windows have also an option to verify apps through certificates which isn't the case with Linux AFAIK. If you want to stay safe on Windows to some degree you can, but the real problem IMO is that Windows is hugely more used and run by less technical persons. 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] matelt@feddit.uk 25 points 3 months ago

The first paragraph alone filled me with so much emotion because my very first computer was a Pentium 75 too! If I hadn't switched over to Linux earlier this year I would do it again in a heartbeat 💓 best decision I've ever taken!

[-] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago

I've said this many times here, but I was a Windows fanboy for close to 30 years. I hate that Windows got so bad, but I'm happy that I switched. Linux is great.

[-] AngularViscosity@piefed.social 22 points 3 months ago

The only thing holding me back at this point is a thin thread called my favorite game only supports and requires anti-cheat on Windows. :(

And money but hopefully that'll solve itself soon.

[-] SatyrSack@quokk.au 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Money is stopping you from using Linux? What does that mean?

[-] fascicle@leminal.space 10 points 3 months ago

You see Linux is free so what will you spend your money on?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AngularViscosity@piefed.social 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It means that I need more storage space to do what I want to do

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago

1 reason:

Microsoft

[-] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

Any Tipps on how to do that in a business environment? Preferably from people who are actually using Linux in a professional environment? I'm using Linux at home for more than a decade now, and I don't miss Windows at all, but transforming a smallish company to use Linux in a way that is remotely as comfortable as the Windows stuff seems impossible for now. I need to find solutions that don't make it harder for our staff to get their work done, because they are busy enough with actual work.

Simply replacing MS Office with LibreOffice and Nextcloud for example does not cut it. The tight integration of MS Teams, Office and Cloud functionality is seen as a huge benefit there and I can't just take that away from them unless I find a combination of tools that work in a similar fashion. Using Google products instead is obviously not a viable alternative. Every cloud based solution I have found so far is underwhelming at best and lacks a good integration.

Serious answers appreciated.

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Any Tipps on how to do that in a business environment?

Simply replacing MS Office with LibreOffice and Nextcloud for example does not cut it. The tight integration of MS Teams, Office and Cloud functionality is seen as a huge benefit there and I can't just take that away from them unless I find a combination of tools that work in a similar fashion.

You just answered your own question; you can’t. Add in Group Policy Management and Active Directory and there is no windows replacement in any other OS.

Now mix in O365 and it just got more complicated.

If anyone knows of a 1:1 Linux equivalent for AD, GP, and DFS (both replication and namespace) I’d love to learn about it.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

The computer savvy folks don’t need to be reminded. The non savvy folks who don’t have time to learn Linux are stuck with windows/apple.

[-] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 months ago

Many tech-savvy people just haven’t made the switch to Linux - often out of convenience rather than capability. Focusing on broader adoption first could make it easier to introduce Linux to less technical users later.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 9 points 3 months ago

For me, these are 5 reasons to stay on Linux. :-)

[-] Rooster326@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Real-time Kernel?

Like my popcorn?

Desktop environment

Jimmy I work in an office. What are you talking about?

  • Your average Windows user... Probably.
[-] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

To me, that's the same as "Five reasons not to invite a renowned scammer and con artist into your home". Unfortunately, my work colleagues think its normal and what else can they do but shrug.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

i worked in a specific financial subindustry and the three software packages that were the best in the industry were not supported on linux (i did not test with WINE). the only software package that had linux support was absolutely awful. interface designed by business majors, not industry specialists.

i wish it were easy to work on linux, but hoping doesn't get them to change.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bobaworld@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

One of the biggest things keeping me from jumping into Linux as my primary OS is because of nvidia's performance issues, particularly with DX12 games on Linux. I'd be taking like a 10%-30% performance hit. I know the games will "run" but I want them to run well, that's why I spend so much money on my GPU.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
451 points (97.9% liked)

Linux

11343 readers
400 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS