113
submitted 11 months ago by Salamendacious@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) announced Tuesday that she would not be seeking reelection in 2024 because “Washington, D.C. is broken,” she said in a statement.

The Arizona congresswoman also said she wants to spend more time with family.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 54 points 11 months ago

Who does she think is breaking things?

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Inquiring minds want to know

[-] HoustonHenry@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

How's that for an oxymoron - "Inqui(R)ing Minds" 😆

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago

It's ha(R)d to know...

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

An important point from the article:

A Republican candidate is likely to fill her position, given her district’s lean, but all eyes are on Arizona in the upcoming election year with the state becoming one of the key swing states in recent election cycles.

[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"In this time when we need patriots to fight for a free and fair society ... I quit as it is very hard currently and not worth my effort financially. Thank you for paying for my TED talk."

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 19 points 11 months ago
[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

From what I gather she's rather conservative so maybe she's just frustrated with divided government in general. Who knows though, she could have been offered a lucrative job in the private sector.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

Nah, she just feels like she reached her goals in ruining the government.

[-] thechadwick@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In her defense, once you have actually broken the legislature, to the point it is literally not functioning, where do you go from there?

Mission Accomplished banner waves in the background as SpongeBob and the freedom caucus save the city!

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

once you have actually broken the legislature, to the point it is literally not functioning, where do you go from there?

Usually a lucrative corporate boardroom position.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

I'll bet she patted herself on the back for a job well done!

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That's definitely possible

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Well then maybe she shouldn’t stood there waving an American flag while letting some orange bully take a shit in the sandbox telling everyone it was fudge, the best fudge, yuuge wonderful fudge.

[-] iamericandre@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Good riddance

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

*Broken largely by obstructionist republicans and corporations.

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 8 points 11 months ago

A hopeful take: Maybe this is clearing the runway for voting "present".

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago
[-] memfree@lemmy.ml -5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

?
No, not really. You don't have to like her, but tell the truth. From: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2023/10/06/reps-debbie-lesko-and-paul-gosar-pick-sides-in-the-speakers-race/71090307007/

Two of Arizona’s six House Republicans threw their weight behind candidates in next week’s race to replace ousted Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

Rep. Paul Gosar endorsed Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio; he's a right-wing firebrand known as a loyal ally of former President Donald Trump. Trump also wants Jordan to get the speaker's gavel.

Rep. Debbie Lesko endorsed Jordan’s leading challenger, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise of Louisiana, a longtime member of House GOP leadership.

Emphasis mine.

[-] _Sc00ter@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago

Wow you're confidently incorrect. Your article is from before Scalise dropped from the race. She's voted for Jordon in the vote this week.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/17/politics/republicans-who-voted-against-jim-jordan/index.html

[-] memfree@lemmy.ml -2 points 11 months ago

She voted for ANYONE to be speaker rather than having no speaker at all. That is not the same as supporting someone. When given the choice, she actively wanted someone else and NOT Jordon (not that Scalise is a great choice either). Seeing how broken the House has become, she's throwing up her hands and giving up -- but I do expect she will vote for whomever her party votes on because she wants the government to function at least a little.

If I missed some quote where she actually voiced support for Jordon more than saying that we need a Speaker, please enlighten me.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

If you're looking for quotes, where's the quote to prove that she voted for anyone?

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

All of Arizona's house republicans voted for Jordan

source

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

In other words:

“Our work is done here.”

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Thoughts and prayers

[-] vertigo3pc@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I've seen people similarly regard their scale as broken because it had a number they didn't like.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
113 points (97.5% liked)

News

22890 readers
3639 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS