29
submitted 1 month ago by Radiantly9267@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/54288281

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/cblock-origin/

I found this addon on firefox addon store. Its named like cblock origin. Is this genuine ?

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TwilightKiddy@programming.dev 61 points 1 month ago

It says in the description that this is a version with minimal changes that exists because uBlock is not available in China. It looks like the source is located here: https://codeberg.org/lanticy/cBlock

I wouldn't use it if you have the ability to use the original uBlock, but if you have no other choice, this looks plausable.

[-] irmadlad@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

103 Users should set off an alarm

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 22 points 1 month ago

*Looks at his own add-on with exactly 1 user*

😥

[-] irmadlad@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Looks at his own add-on with exactly 1 user

LOL I didn't mean it as a condemnation or that it was crap. Just that user counts are something I pay attention to when selecting an extension. Kind of like looking at GitHub stars and recent activity.

What does your extension do? I've always wanted to try my hand at one for s&g. Was it difficult?

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No worries, I didn't take it that way.

Mine injects some functionality in a specific government website that I frequently use so it's a very narrow use-case anyway. I only published it "because why not". Not going to link it because I did so under my real name to be able to add it to my CV.

The main thing I had to wrap my head around was the difference between content and background scripts. Other than that, of course, reading the steps to publish the add-on at Mozilla.

[-] irmadlad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Not going to link it because I did so under my real name to be able to add it to my CV.

Understandable. I think we need all the functionality injected into government. LOL

content and background scripts. Other than that, of course, reading the steps to publish the add-on at Mozilla.

Sounds like I should put it on my reading list for when I'm in bed smoking a bowl before I retire for the evening.

[-] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 month ago

i see no reason to use that over normal ubo. even in china i believe you can get ubo...?

[-] Radiantly9267@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I know. But what about other less tech savy firefox users. I asked is it spam because we can report the addon to firefox.

[-] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

I would rather trust that mainland china can't use ublock - even less tech savy users would probably avoid a plugin that's written in chinese and would end up far lower on search results.

I'd say not to report something like this

the risk to non-tech-savy is minimal, and the potential usecase is very important to any chinese users

[-] markz@suppo.fi 8 points 1 month ago

Hard to say. It might as well be a harmless hobby project by a chinese university student, but I would only trust an established foss developer for a browser addon.

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Something smells

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
29 points (96.8% liked)

Privacy

43392 readers
405 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS