28
Bad days
(slrpnk.net)
New conspiracy theory: Vance had Charlie killed in order to take his wife
The more I learn about Erica Kirk, the more I think she had him killed or at the very least was in on it.
She literally spent a good portion of her eulogy talking about how wives are not supposed to be slaves. You can't make this shit up.
She also stood on his coffin. I've never even heard of anyone doing that ever.
Edit: apparently that was a fake picture.
You are getting down votes but this is an important post to stop misinformation
That was an AI generated photo.
Ah ok, thank you for letting me know.
Everyone is jumping to infidelity, but it's pretty clear they're just trying replace Kirk with Vance as the leader of TPUSA.
Wut. He's the vice president why would he want to he want to be the head of some no name org?
They're trying (vainly) to craft Vance into the next maga messiah for when Trump dies.
No way that mealy mouthed couch fucker comes close to Trump. I have never understood the Cheeto Banditos appeal but to deny it exists to a large population is ludicrous.
His appeal is a crass businessman who tells it like it is, just another low class white asshole except he was born lucky and cheated his way to the top. American Joe wants to have a beer with Trump. They believe he's bold enough to shake it up and fix the economy.
Vance doesn't have it at all. He's there because he's younger than Biden. Zero charisma in comparison.
Vance is VP because he is no threat whatsoever to Trump. He's no threat because he has no ability, intelligence, or charisma, and he's already bent the knee.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Unfortunately it does represent a significant amount of political power. Trump partially credited TPUSA for his win. With Kirk dead, the whole thing could likely (hopefully) fall apart.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Never seen someone so happy to have a dead husband.
If you were married to that dipshit you'd be happy too.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I see similarities too. JD Vance is a piece of shit.
Christians use 2 Corinthians 2:14 as an excuse for divorce "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever? What agreement has the temple of God with idols?" To divorce and remarry is biblically considered adultery; but Erika is a widow, and if Usha won't convert JD gets a free pass on divorce, and Christians will just excuse it as the righteous thing for JD to do.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Is this the sanctity of marriage and traditional values or whatever the Religious Right is claiming to protect?
Ah, you mean the sanctity being championed by their three-times-married dear leader?
load more comments
(1 replies)
This woman was Miss Arizona? Damn, Arizona basic af.
Your comment reminds me of this self-proclaimed trashbag from Arizona:
The hottest person from Arizona is still from Arizona. It's like an iguana beauty pageant.
Am I supposed to feel pity now for the woman that willingly married that piece of shit?
I'd feel bad for her, but her choice of husband prevents it.
well that and all the actions she's taken both before and after his death
Her husband's death? If only... Oh, you were talking about Kirk's widow? I wasn't.
oh, duh
Selling merch at said husband's funeral isn't exactly conductive to sympathy either..
Edit: Oops, I too thought you meant Kirk 😁
I hope every day is the worst day ever for these people
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)
Microblog Memes
11394 readers
233 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS