123
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] criss_cross@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

What IS a fucking hate symbol then????

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

LGBTQ and trans flags

[-] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago
[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Flown properly, the American flag can be,

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is the farthest thing from a hate symbol you could find.

An upside down national flag is a sign of distress which means you care enough about your nation to consider the current moment as an aboration from the norm.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago
[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Soon the peace gesture with your 2 fingers will be considered an ANTIFA symbol and warrant immediate deportation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dumbass@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago
[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

I think I was trying to suggest something about the duality of man, sir.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

The Mexican flag, probably.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNTIED STATES IS CALLING FOR LAWMAKERS TO BE EXECUTED FOR UPHOLDING THE LAW! WTF IS GOING TO BE DONE ABOUT THIS SHIT?

[-] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 week ago

Following the double negative rule: Anti Anti Fascists leaves you with

Fascists

The USA is dropping the mask for all the world to see.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

AND STILL PEOPLE ARE ACTING LIKE EVERYTHING IS NORMAL! AT THIS POINT I WANT TO SEE MASS PANIC SO I KNOW I'M NOT CRAZY! AND I'M IN CANADA, I WANT MASS PANIC IN CANADA! I AT LEAST WANT THIS SHIT TAKEN SERIOUSLY ENOUGH THAT CANADIANS STOP FUCKING GOING TO THE STATES AS IF EVERYTHING IS NORMAL!

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It would be nice if Canadians would also stop voting for politicians who lead Canada in the same direction as the USA. We need to turn left, not right.

[-] kevinrns@mstdn.social 3 points 1 week ago

@floofloof @FreshParsnip

I wish Canadians would realise they are voting for the same policies, but all the newspapers are owned by a Republican American, and they dont know.

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

AND STILL PEOPLE ARE ACTING LIKE EVERYTHING IS NORMAL!

Nope, we'rs not. But I, like many people, am in a marginalized/bum-fuck town. So, my opinion doesn't matter until the polls open. We voted against this evil, and we will again. But, our government wants to embrace the evil.

We can see it wants to. We don't want it to. But, most of us don't matter to the government. We're not big-dollar donors, so our politicians will ignore us. They've minimalized most people so all that we can do is vote against it.

But, with where the Overton window is, we have one party running with regular evil while the other suggests a diet version of evil.

I AT LEAST WANT THIS SHIT TAKEN SERIOUSLY ENOUGH THAT CANADIANS STOP FUCKING GOING TO THE STATES

With how dried up tourism is, it would seem like they're already doing it. Yet, the government is still going down this path. So, it's not that big of an impact.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago

Combine this policy with declaring anti-fascists as terrorists, and I think a pattern is emerging here.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ah, a potentially divisive hand gesture, inscrutable, controversial and puzzling. What on Earth could it mean?

[-] lando55@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

He's just really happy to be here

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Instead, the Coast Guard will classify the Nazi-era insignia as 'potentially divisive' under its new guidelines. The new policy, set to take effect Dec. 15, similarly downgrades the definition of nooses and the Confederate flag

Threatening racial lynchings is "potentially divisive" but not hateful, apparently. I guess there are very fine people on both sides of the white supremacist lynchings debate.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Oh for a moment there I was beginning to doubt the direction of USA.
Well I guess it's still full steam ahead to dismantle democracy and introduce an authoritarian dictatorship.

[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Trump’s dream of Nazi America is taking shape.

[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Brief anecdote. In school, we used to draw swastikas on everything in order to get others in trouble or to make ourselves seem like assholes. At no point did we consider what we were doing ok, it was just kids riding the edge of something they couldn’t understand for the sake of ignominy. Even we, as ignorant as we were, recognized that the swastika was a hate symbol and thoroughly unacceptable, we were, again, just assholes.

I’ve been saying this quite a lot but this culture war bodes poorly.

[-] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

On a similar tangent, I find hilarity in poorly drawn swastikas - or to use an entertaining but horrendously ablest term, a spastika.

I make no apology for equating the sort of dickhead that scrawls this shit everywhere in adult life with the sort of clueless fuckwit that tests sockets with a fork, and couldn't pour water out of a boot even if the instructions were on the soles.

I don't often like punching down on the lesser-intellectual folk (mainly because I'm dumb as rocks for 23 hours of the day myself) but this is one of the few times I enjoy the opportunity.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Damn been awhile since I've thought about a good old Hale Hortler. Thanks for reminding me that while I might be stupid I at least am better than these fuckwits.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I know its a drama we're past by now but I can't help but think about the people who defended Platner with the line "the military would have stopped him if it was really a Nazi tattoo." Because most of us knew that in fact they would not, and now they have put it in writing.

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Platner said that the marines actually rejected his reenlistment for having ~~death's head~~ forearm tattoos (even though he says got it while in the marines and that it was a common tattoo for marines to have) so he had to join the army out desperation. He really was determined to go back over there and kill more brown people.

Although reading it now it seems the marines rejected him for having visible tattoos on his arm.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] xyzzy@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you read between the lines, this is the clearest sign to date how much they're struggling with recruiting for the armed forces.

[-] PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

This will be changed after Trump is removed.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Divisive."

I mean, COME ON guys, lets just meet halfway. They wear swastikas and SS uniforms, and you don't complain anymore, it's called COMPROMISE.

[-] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

"Don't you see? Those people find civil rights offensive too! Why don't we just compromise and only call klan hoods "divisive" rather than "hateful." That will solve the issue!"

7wl4vDjUFDGFFNq.png

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Pretty much every reddit comment section on default subs.

At least before most people got replaced by bots.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It wasnt even 24 hours before the the colossal apopcalyptic blowback on this made them reverse their decision.

Now we just have to wonder why they want to make hate symbols okay in the military.. I'm sure its totally not anything to do with trying to build a white nationalist military that will gleefull obey illegal orders and slaughter the "other" in the streets at piggy boys command.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

They didn't go so far to include the Confederate flag yet. I guess that hits closer to home still, even though the two can sometimes be seen together.

The sign of a true idiot is when they fly either of these beside the US flag.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Instead, the Coast Guard will classify the Nazi-era insignia as 'potentially divisive' under its new guidelines. The new policy, set to take effect Dec. 15, similarly downgrades the definition of nooses and the Confederate flag

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Correct, read it wrong, I had seen the rest of the part about it remaining banned except for certain historical works. For now.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
123 points (99.2% liked)

politics

26496 readers
672 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS