132
submitted 3 weeks ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago

How sad for them. I'm sure the kids who are now not getting their aids treatment because DOGE employees cancelled USAID didn't feel abandoned.

[-] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 weeks ago

Doge Cuts to USAid Blamed for 300,000 Deaths — Most of Them Children

it’s worse than that

[-] 13igTyme@piefed.social 13 points 3 weeks ago

Last I saw the number was 600k.

[-] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

yeah, but they were probably brown, so it's fine /s

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago

“I knew this was wrong and only did it because I thought I had fascist immunity”

[-] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 3 weeks ago

oh no. you mean a billionaire is only out for himself and doesn't have your back?? COLOUR ME SHOCKED!

[-] offspec@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago
[-] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

true true. Disgusting :/

There are people who can't afford healthcare (especially in the USA), and that POS is getting a trillion dollars? Fuck that POS.

[-] LostWanderer@fedia.io 17 points 3 weeks ago

It would be nice if they were prosecuted, as one of their DOGE members leaked the Social Security numbers in plaintext for every malicious actor to take advantage of. All because they were a stupid, brash fool that thought they could do something and not get caught. 🙄🤬

[-] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

I hope they live in fear for the rest of their miserable lives.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

I’m sure they’ll get picked up by The Heritage Foundation or some other Right Wing org and protected. Can’t have the spineless lackeys spilling the beans.

[-] dellish@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

And who's going to prosecute them? The Democrats? Don't make me laugh. As was the case in the last Democrat term, they'll just nurse their thumbs with their assholes for years, then maybe half-ass an attempt at getting some low-hanging fruit when the public voices become too loud to ignore, and achieve a whole lot of nothing.

I truly hope I'm wrong about this.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

a senior DOGE figure named Donald Park tried to reassure his colleagues that they were still ‘brothers in arms’ and that Musk would continue to protect them.That led to another protesting and advising, “Guys, seriously get your own lawyer if you need it. Elon’s great, but you need to watch your own back.”

"Guys have you tried being a rich billionaire who can buy your own way out of trouble? Now get back to work."

[-] fizzle@quokk.au 13 points 3 weeks ago

I do feel like these idiots should be thrown under the bus, and punished to the full extent of the law. I really do hope they're held accountable for their wanton destruction.

That said, I can imagine some college graduates going along with something like this simply because they don't have the life experience to really understand the legal, political, and social ramifications of what they're doing.

[-] Burninator05@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

I'd be willing to be lenient-ish with them if they can provide evidence and testimony that results in the successful prosecution of those above them. I'd be willing to continue to be lenient-ish as long as we keep getting info on a bigger criminal.

[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly they can probably provide you with legitimate electronic transcripts of the people at the top that orchestrated everything.

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 4 points 3 weeks ago

Is there like, an actual list of shit these DOGE dumbasses did?

Not that I'm questioning that they did shit, but so far, being outside of the US, all I got was general accusations without any proof. I'd love to see the list of actual damage done, with receipts and all, just so it's quantifiable.

[-] fizzle@quokk.au 3 points 3 weeks ago

There's probably some commentary, but there's no list of criminal charges.

[-] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

18USC115 has some good starting points

[-] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago

It's fine, Musk can find a new batch of kinda smart but not really college dropouts with delusions of impressing a narcissistic rich guy and a history of starting arguments with "well, actually, white men are the most oppressed social group". They seem to be cloning them at industrial scale these days.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Musk had not been just their visionary leader. For them, he was their protector: the man who had a direct line to Trump, who they believed could pick up the phone and secure a presidential pardon if the worst came.

Now, that seems not to be a quote from somebody involved, but a quote from Politico, but with that in mind....

What kind of person does something with the expectation that they might need a pardon? Only people who think they might be committing a crime. You know, criminals.

And I would argue that if they were committing crimes with the expectation that Musk would secure them pardons from Trump, that is describing a conspiracy that includes Musk himself. (As well as Trump, but it wouldn't be possible to charge him with that, given a recent Supreme Court ruling.)

If I was the next president, I'd have everybody from DOGE on federal charges as soon as was feasible, including Musk... Although given Trump's health, the next president will likely be Vance. I wonder what the odds makers put on Vance being the next president.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, but they’ve already claimed that Musk wasn’t part of DOGE and he’ll claim that the employees were making assumptions and he never said such a thing. And he’d probably be correct; Musk is much better than Trump at weasel wording things.

Doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be a meticulous investigation though.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I don't doubt that Musk is better than Trump at any sort of intellectual pursuit, but that's only because Trump is that much of a dumbass. I mean, Musk seems to be able to read at a reasonably adult level.

Musk frequently says and does quite stupid things that involve him or his companies in legal peril. He's famous for over-promising and under-delivering, and not via weasel words, but being specific. I think he gets away with it more from having good lawyers than from him acting any more intelligently than the average person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

I've never feared criminal prosecution after doing work, maybe because I've never done anything illegal? Why is it that some people (often wealthy) think that laws won't apply to them? Especially people around Trump when he has had demonstrated history of throwing so many people under the wheels in the past?

[-] smh@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

I know a few trans librarian acquaintances who got the fuck out of Florida because the legal environment was getting too spicy. So yes, generally agree that if you fear criminal prosecution for doing your job something is wrong. In the trans librarian case, it's Florida. In Doge's case it was their behavior.

Not sure where I'm going with this, thinking on which set of folk feared repercussions enough to change something (environment or behavior)

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Lol I remember the countless posts on how these guys would end up being the fall guys for all of it. Least surprising twist of the year.

[-] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

In fascism literally everyone is a future fall guy.

[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

How about the department heads that let it happen? Doge went into systems unchallenged.

[-] bytesonbike@discuss.online 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Unchallenged AND illegal.

These mfers went into offices, flashes a DOGE badge and stole data. They need to be locked up

[-] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Consequences?

Since when?!

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago

Seriously, people hear "you can be a piece of shit for a little." And jump on the opportunity, and then wonder why people don't like them.

[-] 0ndead@infosec.pub 6 points 3 weeks ago

Get fucked, traitors

[-] Jax@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

They'll be lucky if they're thrown in camps and aren't just purged.

[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, america is really good at prosecuting criminals that aren't black and smoke weed.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Definitely not the kind of thing you'd have to worry about if you worked for a real government agency. You might get laid off or fired, but as long as you're doing your job, you won't be prosecuted for it.

However, if your "job" involves doing something illegal, that might require a pardon...maybe you should think twice about volunteering for that position.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Why would you be worried about that? Did you do incredibly damaging illegal things?

[-] crandlecan@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

Oh no! Those poor kids 😩🫶

🖕🖕🖕🤮

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Throw every last one in prison immediately. Make sure they spill their guts on musk and theil if they ever want to see the light of day again or just add them to the guillotine list

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Big Balls is gonna get neutered.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago
[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago
[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago

DOGE members are no different from ICE, they impart violence upon the innocent through bureaucracy. Both DOGE and ICE should put to trial at Nuremburg 2.0 as a class, and then anyone found on the books in their employ, executed.

These people are willfully evil, and are torchbearers of the Confederates. They shouldn't be allowed to raise future generations that carry on their beliefs.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well that's just ridiculous. There's far more than only prosecution to be worried about.

[-] MoreZombies@quokk.au 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, no.

Anyway...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
132 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26688 readers
624 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS