331
submitted 2 days ago by pylapp@programming.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nutomic@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 day ago

EU officials are, incidentally, exempt from chat monitoring – which is quite convenient for someone like von der Leyen. Their communication is explicitly NOT to be monitored. The mere fact that those who drafted this law don't want it to apply to them tells you everything you need to know about it.

https://x.com/martinsonneborn/status/1995182586612609241

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 10 points 1 day ago

These pathetic morons think they'll be safe through this exemption. In reality these deliberate security holes will affect everyone. How will these morons be safe when every person they have contact with IRL is a walking microphone for every foreign intelligence agency?

[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

So you're telling me the one person who's been making deals behind closed doors (illegal), and then 'accidentally' deleting all messages regarding said deals (also illegal) will be exempt from having all their communication scanned?

[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Everyone who originally proposed this or otherwise helped in drafting this should be thoroughly investigated under suspicion of foreign affiliation. Chat Control doesn't just start the EU's transformation into a surveillance state. It also weakens its digital defenses. No matter how you look at it, this is treason both towards the European people, as well as towards the individual countries and the Union as a whole.

[-] sibachian@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 days ago

people miss the most important problem with this. chat control is a fascist tool that can and will be used against us minorities. this is especially dangerous when more and more countries are starting to lean right.

hitler would have had a field day with this kind of tech.

[-] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Danes are fascist, they pushed it through.

[-] sibachian@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

danes are sucking thiels cock for their own wicked reasons.

as we've always said; never trust a dane!

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Danes have been quite xenophobic lately.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It also makes what the Stasi in Socialist East Germany did to its citizens look harmless in comparison. It's literally Big Brother, but you carry him around with you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago

Dear mods, watch what you remove from these chats, our freedoms are getting fucked, people should be allowed to be indignant.

That being said i hope the legislators sit on cacti all day every day, those fucking assholes are exempt from this bullshit.

They will take my data out of my cold dead hands. It was a matter of time, sure, but I was actually holding on to hope for this one. I am pissed, dismayed even.

Session, signal, simplex are your friends. If those give up the ghost and bend the knee then we are going back to irc and aliases. Fucking shit!

[-] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 2 days ago

And here I was thinking the EU was winning its fight against authoritarianism. Guess nowhere is safe, everyone's gotta push back no matter where you are. Fucking exhausting that they can't just leave us the fuck alone.

[-] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We are embracing authoritarianism everywhere. Democracies are dying.

Politicians are not ignorant of the risks; as the article mentions, they had several advisors, including scientists, who warned of the danger. If our leaders didn't know, they wouldn't exclude themselves from the proposal.

[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Sociopaths will be sociopaths. They'll continue saying that protesting and violece are never the answer, while eroding our basic rights and ignoring all pushback.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

When people rise up: "How dare you destroy property value!"

[-] dave@feddit.uk 133 points 2 days ago

Countries which support the implementation of Chat Control:

Spain, Romania, Portugal, Malta Lithuania, Hungary, Ireland, France, Denmark, Croatia, Cyprus, and Bulgaria.

Countries that are undecided:

Belgium, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Slovakia, and Sweden.

Countries which oppose Chat Control:

Slovenia, the Netherlands, Poland, Luxembourg, Germany, Estonia, Finland, the Czech Republic, and Austria

[-] Kroko@feddit.online 76 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] CleoCommunist@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 days ago
[-] RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

And Italy is one of them??? Lmao

[-] CleoCommunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I know, last time i checked It was indecided and im Happy its against now.

I Hope more countries Will shoft beacouse its not looking good

[-] curious_dolphin@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Can someone help me understand the likely outcome in countries that implement chat control? Will those governments force Google and Apple to remove apps that do not comply (e.g. Signal) from their official app stores? Will those governments somehow detect users who find workarounds and go after them? I figure most people in those countries will shrug their shoulders and move on with their lives, but how will this impact citizens who do not wish to comply?

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 94 points 2 days ago

misleading headline, this isn't a list of countries in which the law will (if it passes) be different (it won't be, it's an EU law, so will be the same in all EU countries), it's a list of countries that currently support/oppose the law

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 50 points 2 days ago

It isn't misleading (that'd be a technically true headline, which this isn't). This is a downright lie, or as some might say, "fake news".

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

(it won't be, it's an EU law, so will be the same in all EU countries)

This is not true btw. It's not a mandatory law, and if you read the news about this the last 3 weeks, you would know that.

EU laws are not automatically mandatory. That's not how it works at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

Now let's hope Parliament will still vote against it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago

Why? Why is the loss of such a significant amount of privacy necessary?

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Literally pedophiles.

Allegedly.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

People will figure out that the war in Ukraine actually started before 2014.

[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It isn't necessary.

[-] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 days ago

It isn't it's just an excuse to put people you don't like in some kind of hole where they rot to death.

[-] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 days ago

The one good thing of brexit: UK isn't beholden to this.

The bad thing is that their own laws aren't much better. And of course all the other brexit bad stuff

[-] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

From the Online Safety Act Wikipedia page:

The act also requires platforms – including end-to-end encrypted message providers – to scan for child pornography and terrorism content, which experts say is not possible to implement without undermining users' privacy.

[-] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 61 points 2 days ago

I'm missing a bit the fact that this is not a law yet. This is the position of the commission, which the parliament will then need to approve and has to get past the ECHR as well most likely.

[-] Blackdoomax@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago

Is there something we can do to effectively oppose that shit ?

[-] Giraffe@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago
[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Matrix would be the best alternative

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
331 points (91.7% liked)

Privacy

43392 readers
932 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS