73
submitted 1 month ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dukemirage@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago

I mean great that they do actual work to preserve games, but this is a commercial store. They should found a non-profit if they want to receive donations.

[-] calliope@retrolemmy.com 28 points 1 month ago

This comes across as absolutely bizarre to me. It’s a for-profit company that is owned by CD Projekt.

If it was an actual foundation it would be different, but “donating” your money so one of the most profitable game companies can make more money seems like a weird thing to do.

The Video Game History Foundation has existed for close to nine years and is actually a non-profit.

[-] MudMan@fedia.io 22 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I'm mostly with you on that one. This creates some questions aobut their viability and there isn't a particularly clear path from it to specific releases.

There was a bit of a mixed reception to this in their Discord server when they first revealed it and despite them taking the feedback quite graciously the final version hasn't changed much at all.

It's not a dealbreaker, and if you want to support them by all means, go nuts. I'd maybe politely suggest buying games instead of this, though.

[-] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 1 month ago

Idk, i see this as them wanting to work on projects they know aren't commercially viable. If i had the spare cash, i would consider it.

[-] MudMan@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago

I guess? I still don't see why spending the same money buying games wouldn't achieve the same goals. Ultimately the commerical viability of the service for the devs that need to choose to use it is in the sales they generate, not the revenue they collect to secure the deals.

[-] exu@feditown.com 1 points 1 month ago

You see, if you buy a game they have already put in all the work, but if you donate they just get money to work on whatever. I know which version any corporation would like

[-] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

FWIW, I'd rather support GOG than Steam any day. I'd just... rather also support some devs and get a game to play. I'd even consider a subscription blind box thing or whatever, if their concern is reliable income. The Patreon model is just an awkward fit, though. That's even acknowledging that they've been doing more behind the scenes stuff and video content.

[-] finley@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, while they may start off running this in an ethical manner, I don’t have a lot of faith that it will remain that way.

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Fuck off, GOG. You're a business, not a charity. You made that clear when your bailed on SKG

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago
[-] Bronzor@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago
[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Oh right that. They stopped that?

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Bronzor beat me to it but, yes Stop Killing Games.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org -1 points 1 month ago

This sounds like a good system!

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
73 points (95.1% liked)

PC Gaming

13294 readers
219 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS