27
submitted 3 months ago by Stamau123@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
  • Report was expected to delve into factors behind 2024 defeat
  • Hundreds of party officials were interviewed
  • Recent election victories convinced party leaders to shelve report

WASHINGTON, Dec 18 (Reuters) - The Democratic Party said on Thursday it would not release an internal review of its loss to Republican President Donald Trump in 2024, saying that a public airing of its failures would distract from focusing on winning future elections.

The party has been embroiled in finger-pointing over who was to blame for Vice President Kamala Harris' defeat. Harris became the Democratic presidential candidate just weeks before the election after President Joe Biden abruptly quit the race.

The so-called autopsy report, which involved hundreds of interviews with party officials across the country, was an attempt to arrive at some consensus.

Instead, after Democrats won governor races in New Jersey and Virginia last month and showed strength in other contests, the much-anticipated report will now be put aside as the party looks ahead to next year’s midterm elections, when it will try to retake control of Congress from Republicans.

“In our conversations with stakeholders from across the Democratic ecosystem, we are aligned on what’s important, and that’s learning from the past and winning the future,” Ken Martin, the chair of the Democratic National Committee, said in a statement on Thursday. “Here’s our North Star: does this help us win? If the answer is no, it’s a distraction from the core mission.”

Harris’ defeat laid bare a rupture in the party between its liberal and more centrist wings, with each faction claiming that it held the blueprint for the path forward.

But the report was not expected to touch upon that ideological divide, nor was it expected to place blame on either Harris or Biden. The report’s findings centered on process — voter contacts, fundraising and media messaging, according to a DNC official who spoke on condition of anonymity. It touched upon Trump’s success at reaching younger voters and his ability to exploit nontraditional media, such as podcasts.

The report also contended that Democrats failed to adequately address voters’ concerns on issues such as the economy, public safety and immigration, issues on which Trump was able to make gains, the official said.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nixienox@piefed.social 22 points 3 months ago

Ah, yes, hundred of interviews with party officials and 0 interviews with voters and potential voters. That's the Democratic party we've come to know and...know.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 3 months ago

Hey, speak for yourself, some people actually like them for it (mainly those with a neglection fetish).

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

“In our conversations with stakeholders from across the Democratic ecosystem, we are aligned on what’s important, and that’s learning from the past and winning the future,”

And you're showing that commitment to learning from the past by refusing to have a conversation about it.

“Here’s our North Star: does this help us win? If the answer is no, it’s a distraction from the core mission.”

Being dishonest and refusing to engage with your voters does not help you win.

[-] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 months ago

This just in - Democratic Party quintuples down on refusal to ever learn anything,

[-] TVA@thebrainbin.org 1 points 3 months ago

"We interviewed ourselves and we all agree that we're great!" --DNC, apparently

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

They would have released it if that had been the result. They couldn't even get the party faithful to pretend that the party isn't shit.

[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

adequatelv address voters' concerns on issues such as

the economy, public safety and immigration, issues on

which Trump was able to make gains, the official said

Fuck the right wing media. Fuck.

[-] bklyn@piefed.social 9 points 3 months ago

"Don't let anyone know why we lost in 2024! Maybe they won't notice this time!"

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 months ago

we are aligned on what’s important, and that’s learning from the past and winning the future

This would be funny if it wasn't so sad

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Harris’ defeat laid bare a rupture in the party between its liberal and more centrist wings, with each faction claiming that it held the blueprint for the path forward.

And also with the centrist wing demonstrating that their blueprint was a surefire way to lose to fascists.

The report also contended that Democrats failed to adequately address voters’ concerns on issues such as the economy, public safety and immigration, issues on which Trump was able to make gains, the official said.

Can't imagine why they buried it.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Looking forward not backward and returning to normalcy.

[-] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Normalcy is what gave us Trump

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

“Here’s our North Star: does this help us win? If the answer is no, it’s a distraction from the core mission.”

It's about damn time. No more moral victories, you gotta WIN before you can change or improve anything.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

They're going to designate anything that centrists don't want to do as a distraction so they can ignore the concerns of the left even harder.

this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

News

37024 readers
833 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS