125
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

An Oklahoma man who was doing target practice in his backyard on Christmas is believed to have shot and killed an elderly woman a few blocks from his home, authorities said.

Cody Wayne Adams, 33, has been charged with first-degree manslaughter in connection with the deadly shooting, court filings show.

The victim was on a covered front porch with family members at a residence in Comanche when she was shot Thursday afternoon, according to the probable cause affidavit. She was holding a baby in her left arm while seated on a love seat when she was struck in her right upper arm, according to the affidavit. The bullet then entered her chest cavity, it said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 months ago

Law enforcement investigating the shooting canvassed several residences to the north of the deadly shooting and found that all but one -- Adams' -- had "suitable shooting backstops or firing locations," according to the affidavit.

So… pretty much everyone in the area had a shooting range except the accused?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

A "backstop" is not a shooting range...

It's usually just a pile of dirt.

It's wild for a bunch of people in a neighborhood to all be doing this, because even if the first couple are kind of safe about it, every idiot starts thinking jt's safe to just shoot at a can or anything. All they know is they hear gunshots

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

Sounds like a terrible neighbourhood to live in, shots going off from everyone all the time

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I'm picturing celebratory gunfire into the air every weekend.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 3 months ago

Rent must be hella cheap

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Exactly. Why didn’t he have a shooting range too?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 38 points 3 months ago

And this is why we shouldn't just let every fuckhead idiot have a gun.

[-] AreaKode@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Exactly! I don't want to take away your guns. I want fuckheads like these to not be able to buy them in the first place.

[-] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

Gun ownership should come with a psych test and some kind of basic system for ensuring people understand the gravity of the device they are purchasing at minimum. As it stands, I can walk into a pawn shop a few blocks away and have a weapon in almost no time, and I'm all kinds of fucked up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 months ago

Gun rights, keeping people safe since... Never.

And keeping tyrants who abuse the constitution in check since.. Also never.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just gonna politely point out that America is living under extreme corruption and tyranny right now, and the 2nd amendment aint doing shit to help with that problem. Sure gets lots of innocent citizens killed though.

Just like any expected conflict ever, the 2nd amendment caused an arms race - and the govt is far, far more heavily armed than the people.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

System works as designed. The second amendment fuckwits never cared about freedom and democracy at all.

[-] UnculturedSwine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

Except the freedom to have their murdertoys and power fantasies.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago

its usually the people on the right that are touting the 2nd admen, and they are okay with the faciscm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

The common modern interpretation of the 2nd amendment being that gun sales and ownership must be almost completely unregulated is bullshit and not at all the way it was intended to be interpreted. It was supposed to protect the right of people to form and maintain local militias independent from the federal government, hence the "well-regulated militia" wording. The idea was that if local governments maintained their own militias consisting of private citizens it would create a collective military force capable of keeping the federal army in check. The modern emphasis on individual gun ownership with no organization has clearly not served this purpose.

[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 1 points 3 months ago

Who is protecting your democracy?

Well obviously Dale, the overweight guy who wants nothing more than owing guns and Nazis memorabilia

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The dumbfuck Adams is one of many reasons why the USA needs stricter gun control. I wonder if the worthless POS is a Charlie Kirk supporter.

[-] 843563115848@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago

Is it just a given that if a man's middle name is "Wayne" he's going to jail at some point?

[-] Denvil@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

My middle name is Wayne...

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Wee woo wee woo

[-] Cloudstash@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

"I'm a responsible gun owner, i have owned guns since the dawn of light" - Proceeds to 360 no-scope the neighbor.

Well, no, the average gun owner in USA is not a responsible gun owner.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

There's gotta be a name for the look where a physically unfit/poor performing American tries to offset this by donning physically "tough" fashion accessories and hair dos.

I know there's gravy seals, but they kind of take it to the next level.

This, it's more like a defence mechanism. Like they'd totally get their ass kicked in literally anything—fighting, jogging, getting up out of a chair—but they keep themselves safe by dressing up and casting tough stares.

[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Yup, that's why if you're going to practice, do so on a range and always consider: what the hell is BEHIND/AROUND my target?

JFC for a nation as obsessed with firearms as the United States, the level of firearms safety knowledge is shockingly low.

[-] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

People in my neck of the woods talk about fire arms the way I talk about video games or TV shows. They sound like recreation rather than self defense. I don’t know if knowledge is the only factor; a sense of seriousness about firearms seems to be lacking.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Dude was shooting without a backstop, fucking idiot...

[-] termaxima@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago

We have a place literally designed for target practice, it's called the "shooting range". Ever heard of it ?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wuffah@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

If only that baby were armed, it could have returned fire and everything would have been okay. More guns is the solution!

[-] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It’s insane to me how many people think that taking guns away will actually increase the violence.. like the people that would normally shoot up a place would suddenly become experts at building bombs and take out WAY more people.. when the reality is that those people would probably be more likely to blow themselves up trying to build a bomb.. guns are so simple to kill with, a toddler could do it. Building a bomb or something equivalent is much harder than pulling a trigger.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

In civilized parts of the world, it is illegal to discharge a firearm in an urban area or within X metres of an occupied building etc.

In the USA people shoot in their suburban backyard.

[-] Faildini@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

For what it's worth, it's illegal in the USA too. Obviously that didn't stop this moron.

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I can't think of a place I've lived where discharge of firearms within city limits was not illegal. This moron probably didn't care.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Ban all lead bullets. Ban all semi-auto. Ban all pistols, revolvers, handguns. Nothing but black powder, or bolt action rifle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Geez, if he'd lived any closer it would have gone through her and into the baby as well. Although she probably dropped the baby in any case.

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

1st degree means pre meditated.

Should be negligent homicide.

[-] agedcorn@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

1st degree doesn't mean premeditated, it means to the highest degree. A murder charge typically implies premeditation whereas manslaughter implies recklessness.

1st degree manslaughter sounds right to me, killing someone accidentally through extreme recklessness in this case.

[-] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There’s a bullet hole in the flashing under my second floor gutters, facing the street. Doesn’t look like it came from nearby, like it’s not slanted down toward the street or anything. No idea how long it’s been there, but I found it a few years ago when cleaning the gutters. Bullet might still be lodged in there.

It’s genuinely wild to me that people just fire this shit off willy-nilly.

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 months ago

My wife worked with someone that didn't know that bullets come down after you shoot them in the air. People are fucking stupid.

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

It’s genuinely wild to me that Americans let just anyone have the capability to do that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Beebabe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Coworker of mine was shot through her apartment floor (accidental discharge). She almost died.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
125 points (99.2% liked)

News

36999 readers
603 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS