756
submitted 3 months ago by LiamTheBox@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

...or we can just decentralize the entire web again. Seriously!

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

This is definitely coming if it isn't already here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Shlomo Kramer needs a visit from doctor AK47

[-] huggingstars@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Seems like reverse Nazi to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shaggyb@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well I say he needs to limit his mom from hanging out in my room all night but that's not fucking happening either now is it

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

"Shlomo Kramer"

HA

[-] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

That Heeb be a Dweeb!

[-] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Hic tamen vivit.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I mean, the title may be true, but I'd hardly call this a crazy law. Draconian censorship is routine and endemic globally. It's the Free Speech policy that's "crazy".

As more media is heavily monetized, the real appeal of censorship is as a revenue source. Surveillance, draconian administration, and targeting of dissidents all become income streams for the platforms.

Nothing unusual about that, either

[-] ChristchurchAsshole@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I like free speech. I'm on a 1st amendment guaranteed free speech website and I can scrap with diehard trump supporters on there which is quite fun. There are people who love trump of course and there are also people on the right who are aware that trump is a zionist pet. It's nice being able to disagree with people but without being banned for having the wrong opinion. This way, I develop a better understanding of how others think.

How is targeting dissidents a revenue source? Not in most countries surely?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

How is targeting dissidents a revenue source?

States with large pools of disposable income and businesses with big PR budgets will pay top dollar to squelch activists and opponents.

Not in most countries surely?

How much is Palantir getting paid? How much is Black Cube getting paid? There's always a pricetag on this work and plenty of organizations - especially fascist governments - are happy to outsource the work to friendly contractors.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
756 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

48148 readers
419 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS