68
Citations (slrpnk.net)
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

"A once-in-a-generation mathematical genius" is an extreme exaggeration, to the point that I suspect the person who used the phrase doesn't really understand what it means. The implication of "once-in-a-generation" is that there is about a 20 year window somewhere around their birth where nobody was born who was better.

[-] rainwall@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago

Its a common phrase for an exceptional mind. Its not meant to be taken purely literally becsuse its untestable, but generally remarked upon in hindsight.

You can argue Newton fit the bill even though Liebniz was a peer of his. Einstein and Oppenheimer, etc.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You can argue Newton fit the bill even though Liebniz was a peer of his. Einstein and Oppenheimer, etc.

Those are ones you can argue, though. Nobody would ever seriously argue that Kaczynski was anywhere near the top of his generation. There is no informed list of the greatest mathematicians that has Kaczynski on it.

Let's imagine that, instead of being caught, Kaczynski simply stopped bombing things and was never caught, and lived out the remainder of his life in that shack. In that case, he'd be an obscure genius mathematician who wrote a few exceptional papers. There are a lot of people like that.

I suspect that while right now, you think it's "a common phrase for an exceptional mind," if you really looked into its usage, you'd find that it's generally used for somebody who actually is uniquely exceptional for their time.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Its a common phrase for

No, that's you learning it from context without thinking about what the actual words mean. It's meant to be taken literally.

[-] rainwall@piefed.social -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I disagree. Each generation is 20 years long. With a global birthrate of 140 milllion/year, that means each generation contains 2.8 billlon people.

If there is literally only one person per 2.8 billion that can fit that bill, then the world would never be able to agree on who it is. Who and by what standard is this literal "greatest mind of a generation" selected?

If the phrase is meant literally, it should be "the greatest mind in a generation that people in a paticular society are largely aware of" because otherwise its just unverifiable puffery.

[-] crabArms@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

With a global birthrate of 140 milllion/year, that means each generation contains 2.8 billlon people.

How long has the global birthrate been 140M/yr? More than a generation?

Maybe the current "generation" contains 2.8 billion people. Not convinced that bears much relationship to an average generation throughout history

I also believe the term is typically used as exaggeration/puffery

[-] rainwall@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No idea, but if that number is what youre fixated on, feel free to cut it down to 1/10 the size if that makes it easier. I think we can agree that even in Einstein's time more than 280 million people were born on earth in 20 years, right?

If a generation is hypothetically 280 million people, who gets to deciede and what are the criteria for the literal "greatest mind of a generation?"

Im glad we both think the statekent is puffery, but the person I was replying to was saying this was a literal statement, not exaggeration. I really want to know there take on the above, as i cant find a way to square the math.

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Math really is a language.
Cuz i cannot understand a word of that footnote.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It says, 'Better known for other work'. In case you don't know: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kaczynski#Bombings

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago

That's not the part of the foot note i was referring to.

[-] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Then I think you're misusing the word footnote.

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ha! I was. Thank you.
D'oh

But my point about math still stands lol

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Then maybe you were referring to the part above the footnote, which is called the text ☝️🤓

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social -1 points 1 month ago

It's not a big deal

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Well, of course. If you're not an expert, it's pretty much impossible to understand an out-of-context passage from a more technical or abstract paper.

[-] affenlehrer@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago

I understand that there's a two digit solution if a three digit solution exists but not for which problem and why that's relevant or interesting for anything.

Also, I keep confusing the Unabomber with the Killdozer guy...

[-] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 month ago

Knowing which problem isn't necessary to get the awkwardness of citing a serial killer in a math paper.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

~~Unibomber killed a bunch of kids in a daycare.~~

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're thinking of Timothy McVeigh / Oklahoma City.

The Unabomber was named for bombing Univertities and Airline execs. 'UnA'

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago

I never understood the nickname. Unibomber? He bombed more than one thing. 🤷‍♂️

[-] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago
[-] evidences@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Actually looking it up I think the Un was short for University the A for airline so it was Un(verisity)A(irline)bomber. The name apparently showed up after the FBI connected a bomb he sent in the mail on a plane with the two previous bombs he had sent to Northwestern University.

[-] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

You are correct. Although I always read it as University and Airline bomber but that's just me

[-] TheOakTree@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

When you get English advice from "MeThisGuy"

I suppose it checks out.

[-] ClownStatue@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

“Scandal noted.”

[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't call it "work".

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 1 month ago
[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe he meant it in the sense of "if you do what you love you'll never work a day in your life", i.e. perhaps Teddy K loved him some bombings so much that it wasn't "work"

[-] xor@anarchist.nexus 1 points 1 month ago

work doesn’t just mean “doing stuff for other people for money”      

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
68 points (98.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

10863 readers
728 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS