My partner is non-binary, so this search wouldn't work on them.
Quantum partner.
While your partner can't be found by it, they can be approximated to an arbitrary degree of precision.
quantum bogosearch
Yeees
Yes, people some times live up to 120 years. You should start at 60.
With the limits of longevity still being pushed, I'd suggest sticking with the OP binary search theme and start at 64.
Well, round numbers will indeed make the math easier.
If you like round numbers, 69 is all curves.
What a sexy, sexy number
There was something familiar about the number on the desk. The handwriting was all pretty curves.
So 64 is absolutely perfect being 1000000 in binary, then all you need to do is go one bit a time for a binary search.
And for obvious reasons I think the minimum age has to be 18 so really you should start at 69 (heh, nice).
Nice
You have won at the Internet today! Well done!
Abbott: “So say you’re 40 and you like a girl that’s 10. Well you’re really too old for her because you’re 4x her age. So let’s say you wait 5years. Now you’re 45 and she’s 15, so you’re only 3x as old as her, but that’s still a bit much, so you wait another 15years and now you’re 60 and she’s 30. Only half your age now.
How long do you have to wait till you’re both the same age?”
Costello: “Well 4 then 3 then 2… at this rate she’d better be willing to wait for me too.”
Abbott: “what do you mean?”
Costello: “Going like this, eventually she’ll be older than me and she better wait for me to catch up.”
Abbott: “Why would she wait for you?”
Costello: “WELL I WAITED FOR HER!”
What you want is a distribution-aware contextual binary search. With whatever information you have (appearance, personality, vocabulary, etc), you can come up with a probability distribution in the space of possible ages and start your guess with the value at the 50th percentile. Then depending on whether the true age is higher or lower, your next guess will be either the 25th or 75th percentile. Rinse and repeat.
In reality, the way most people intuitively do agree guessing is already an approximation of this procedure.
What, and then go 37.5? 24 and 48 are right there.
32 is half human life expectancy, and a power of 2.
Gets my vote
Yes, do it in reverse. Ask her if she's 25 first, then if she's 50
If she is not 64 then she is 32.
If she is not 32 then she is 16.
overthere.sit(self)
At 16, she was FAT.
At 32, she was still FAT32.
But by 64, she was exFAT.
D:
There's no right answer to that question. The only winning move is not to play.
Jokes on you, refusing to play is also a losing move. The only winning move is to guess 2-3 years less than the correct answer, by sheer luck.
the mistake was assuming the upper limit ended at 100
Gotta follow Price is Right rules. Closest without going over.
Obviously you should use an exponential search, assuming you don't know the age of the oldest human.
120
Watch out, starting at 50 for binary search will fail if they are 100+ years old. Stay woke.
binary search still works fine, you just need a function probability then you cut at the median, and then rucurse into the slices
lol I just realized that everytime I play guessing numbers I do this
What now. "Don't ask a girl her age" but if a girl asks her own age it's also dangerous?
Girls are dangerous.
They have cooties.
Ewwww
Oooh.
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
