85

Snip:

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met with his Cuban counterpart, Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla, in Beijing on Thursday.

“China firmly supports Cuba in safeguarding its national sovereignty and security, opposes unwarranted interference by external forces, and rejects any attempt to deprive the Cuban people of their rights to survival and development,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said after the meeting.

Lin added that China is ready to support Cuba “to the best of its ability.”

Parrilla wrote on X that the sides “affirmed the special and strategic nature of the historical ties between the two socialist countries.”

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

like they said they would venezuela?

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago
[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

In what material ways?

[-] bdazman@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago

Give them nukes and hypersonic weapons.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

solar panels would be a godsend for them

[-] bdazman@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago

And fucking dialysis machines and the filters that go in them

[-] microfiche@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

nicholson-yes

to the best of its ability

does give me some pause but I fail to see how this is anything but good for Cuba and the Cuban populace.

[-] Keld@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

It's a nice gesture, but I wouldn't rely on China to oppose US imperialism. The only reliable deterrent is a nuke of your own.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yes, they've proven that they've embraced the Republicans motto of "thoughts and prayers" when it comes to supporting weaker socialist countries trying to survive Western pedo hegemony.

To be fair: they would probably end up like the USSR if they actually did try to help

[-] Keld@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago

The USSRs issue was not its commitment to international socialism

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

did it have such a commitment?

[-] Keld@hexbear.net 3 points 6 days ago

Are you doing a bit? A joke? chuckling it up?

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

i know next to nothing of the USSR's international diplomacy besides the fact that they tried to materially support other socialist regimes and that these efforts are in stark contrast to China's seeming indifference (excluding North Korea & Vietnam).

the Sahel states are the only ones to get anything more than "thoughts and prayers" but those initiatives started when they were still under french control so it's questionable at best if they can about counted as support since they've commited similar initiatives in isreal.

[-] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago

It’s common to hear that the USSR got over extended supporting global communism too much but realistically they could have kept that up had they not had the economic problems they did.

China today has much better economic positioning than the USSR for a variety of reasons so I really think them not helping more is a huge mistake but part of it is that while they defensively an in their region they can likely match the US they can’t do that far from home right now.

I’m optimistic this could change as China is able to get to parity with the US on military power projection. I know they have plans for building nuclear powered aircraft carriers which is what they need realistically if they’re going to actually militarily intervene to help say Venezuela or Cuba due to their distance from China.

IMO the next 10 years are going to show if China is actually willing to take on the mantle of the leader of global commmunist movement like it needs to.

[-] Leegh@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

China cannot do any international power projection until they deal with the Taiwan issue first. As long as reunification is not complete, America can keep using that island as a wedge against China, both in geopolitical manoeuvring and economic trade/ warfare.

And even in the case of Taiwan where China actually DOES do power projection, they would rather resort to peaceful means of getting what they want (soft power through economic integration, diplomatic warming, cultural exchanges, and buying out Taiwanese politicians, military officers, and businesspeople) than the American brute force method of using military invasion, gunboat diplomacy, and sanctions.

Of course, this could change as the so-called Davidson window closes next year and China finally reaches military parity with the USA, but they still have to deal with the empire being on their doorstep before doing anything more to help countries like Cuba.

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
85 points (100.0% liked)

news

24588 readers
580 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS