658
"small government" != sticking your nose into other people's sex lives
He's not a small government Republican, he's a using the state as a weapon for his God Republican
load more comments
(1 replies)
So, he's having a gay affair, right?
This pretty much reads as an admission, yup.
So this guy loves the cock.
Yep. Calling it now: dude is gay.
Which is fine, or would be fine, except for the hypocrisy.
pretty fuckin much
“Experts project that homosexual marriage is the dark harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy that could doom even the strongest republic.”
"project" is right!
"Gays are stronger than the strongest republic!"
Sounds like the Sacred Band of Thebes had the right idea. We can only maintain our liberty by embracing the strength of the gays!
Well our they/them missiles and tanks sure are beating the crap out of the "manly" Russian military.
NATO = Sacred Band confirmed??
load more comments
(1 replies)
They defeated even the Spartans, who were so manly that they got their wife to shave her head and banged her in the dark the first time they met because all they had seen until then were sweaty, muscular dudes. Clearly the gayer a polity, the stronger it is.
Chaos? Sexual anarchy? I don't even know what that second one looks like, but sign me up
load more comments
(1 replies)
doom even the strongest republic
Translation: If people we don't like are allowed to have nice things, we'll throw a temper tantrum and burn the house down.
load more comments
(2 replies)
He's a fucking christofascist. He doesn't think gay sex should just be illegal, he thinks anyone who is queer should be killed because they are sinning against God. Even if he hasn't openly called for that, a key tenant of his faith is that. He's a terrible person who has just gone a bit under the radar so the Republicans could shove him through quickly.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Seems to be a lot of projection here, as usual. I give him two months before he's outed as a boner smoking drag queen^TM^
Edit: Not that there's anything wrong with that.
I get what you're saying, just be a little careful with this idea. As a gay person it's somewhat disheartening to see everytime some ass hole homophobe is trying to opress us people go "oh he must be gay, lol." It can come across as using gay as an insult which I think your edit acknowledges. Not that internally repressed homophobes who take it out on others aren't sometimes a thing of course, but just remember the vast majority of people opressing, abusing, and hurting the lgbtq community are straight people, it's not just gay people taking it out on themselves. There aren't nearly enough gay people in existence for that to be even remotely true.
As a gay person, myself, I never saw comments like this as using gay as an insult because what’s being called out here is the hypocrisy, not whether or not they’re gay. Intelligent people will realize that, and the dumb bigots are going to be dumb bigots regardless.
No I didn't think the commenter meant gay as an insult to be clear, just that if not carefully phrased it may come off that way. I know the hypocrisy is the main pont. I think that makes sense if it's like, a story about someone being caught with a rent boy or something sure. In this case though I didn't see anything in this story to provide any evidence that this person is anything but straight.
I've just noticed this tendency that for any anti gay politician, the comments will immediately fill up with tons of people insinuating well that politician must be gay then. It starts to feel like it's a insinuation that all homophobia is just gay people doing it to themselves or something. Or like makes homophobia into a "gay problem" that straight people have nothing to do with. Which obviously isn't the case.
I know it seems like a stereotype, but it does happen not infrequently that gay-hating GOP politicians get outed in embarrassing ways as massive hypocrites, and not even always as gays. Hypocrisy is a major cornerstone of the GOP.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I hear you and agree. Not all loud, dramatic anti-gay people are actually saying, "Hey! Look what I'm not! At all! Not even that one time in college!" - but it sure seems to pan out that way with politicians.
Yeah, there is a reason we find out about these things through leaks and such: Gay republicans have to hide themselves or else face the bigotry that exists within their colleagues/constituents.
Still dumb fuck hypocrites though.
“Use my marginalization to oppress me, at least I pay $3.75 less in taxes.”
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
There's nothing wrong with being a cock gobbling slut, but there is something wrong with being a hypocritical anti lgbt Republican, while being a cock gobbling slut.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Tapping his foot in an airport bathroom in 3-2-1...
As an Idahoan, I'm just overjoyed that Larry Craig is still being referenced after all this time.
It's just nice to be in the conversation occasionally.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Certainly not.
But for someone who’s worried gay sex can “threaten democracy” and who also believes the orange rapist’s Big Lie . . . /Nelson
load more comments
(1 replies)
So are we talking just dudes, and is he okay with girl-on-girl or what? You never have to dig too deep to find the hypocrisy from these fuckheads.
homosexual marriage is the dark harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy that could doom even the strongest republic.
Jesus fucking christ! For a guy harping on about "traditional gender roles" (aka celebrating toxic masculinity and misogyny) he sure is a hell of a drama queen!
That's actually the name of my black metal band: Dark Harbinger of Chaos and Sexual Anarchy. Doom the Republic is our latest album.
That better be true. Don’t give me hope.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Way to make queer people sound super cool.
Apparently, gay people are so powerful that they can tear down an entire society just by getting married.
Hey gay folks. Want to join up with a straight Jew? I've got a spare space laser here we could use.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Johnson called homosexuality a “inherently unnatural” and “dangerous lifestyle” that would lead to legalized pedophilia and possibly even destroy “the entire democratic system.”
Johnson led more than 100 Republican lawmakers in an amicus brief supporting a Texas lawsuit that sought to challenge the results of the election in states won by Biden. The brief cited concern about "unconstitutional irregularities" in the voting.
No Mike. That is you trying to destroy democracy. Not those that you have spent decades you demonizing and harassing.
“Your race, creed, and sex are what you are, while homosexuality and cross-dressing are things you do”
This is honestly all you need to know. People can pick and choose their sexual preferences, but they’re inherently born with belief in a millennia-old fantasy book.
Anyone who thinks it's what one does that makes them gay is repressing some shit
load more comments
(4 replies)
So deep in the closet, he's finding Christmas presents.
The more you dig into this guy you find he hates women, hates the lgbtq community, and hates America.
What a piece of shit. I got $10 that’s says Mike Johnson secretly fucks guys. Seems like the loudest anti gay politicians almost always hang out in the closet.
load more comments
(2 replies)
And the Log Cabin Republicans will support him because they are the stupidest shits to exist since Jews for Hitler.
"Once wrote" is a euohemism for "has learned not to to be too overt about his hatreds to protect his political career and to carry on his mission".
Meanwhile, I'm hiding inside with my kids under a shelter in place order because one of these MAGAts is roaming the woods with an AR-15.
load more comments
(2 replies)
how long before we discover his secret life
He’s probably a closeted homosexual himself. That seems to be the general trend amongst people like this.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
658 points (98.4% liked)
politics
19120 readers
2740 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS