136
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 hours ago

How can Thunderbird be the third favourite Email service, when it's not even an email service? It's a mail user agent.

Or do they mean the Thundermail service available in the Thunderbird Pro Subscription?

[-] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

Surprised privacy conscious people are so pro obsidian when it's not even source available

[-] holomorphic@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

It keeps my data in plain text files, integrates well with git and simply does the most things I always wanted a note taking application to do, when compared with anything else I have tried so far.

Yes, I would be happier with an open source application, but the first two are hard requirements for me, which already removes the majority of the alternatives.

On the other hand, I will never understand why anyone would use brave, given how shady the thing is.

[-] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago
[-] holomorphic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Does support internal links, md rendering and a useful search over all files without having to configure everything for three weeks? Because those features were what made me switch after a few years of just using vim.

Also having dynamic todo boxes on my daily notes, collected from all my ~1k notes.

Those are actual questions, not sarcasm, btw. I have never used nvim. I was under the impression it was more or less just vim.

[-] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago

Emacs supports whatever you want and more with org-mode. It's an upfront investment but you can use your config until you die.

[-] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

Ever used org-roam? It's org-mode plus obsidian features. Absolutely love it.

[-] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago

Yeah I should have said it explicitly but that's what I was referring to. I have an org-mode / org-roam setup.

[-] velxundussa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

It doesn't quite fit your requirements, but org mode from emacs is very close.

.org files instead of .md, and the preview does require a bit of config, but it's not as bad as some make it be, especially if you pickup a preconfigured emacs "distro" (like doom emacs for example) in which case I think it's just a feature flag to set to on.

Org is also very appreciated for it's TODO features, which you seem to make a big use of.

It probably isn't a match for you due to the markdown requirement, but I'm mentioning it just in case you didn't consider it in the past.

[-] holomorphic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Thanks for the recommendation. I knew org-mode exists, but I've only ever used emacs for proof-assistants which have no other ide-support. I guess I should at least give it a try.

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Probably because it is all portable and in markdown, the devs are widely available and it is open enough that community, open source plugins can be easily made which allow you to make custom workflows that simply aren't available in any alternatives.

Linking is significantly easier and better than any alternative I have tried which significantly lowers the effort of documentation which is the largest hurdle for most people. As all social media shit apps have taught us, ultra low-effort beginning of a habit is the key to consistent use.

And if the dev enshittifies, all of your notes are safe in plaintext markdown and not a proprietary format and can be imported and cleaned up in your choice of new editor and fix the linking.

[-] Samsy@lemmy.ml 95 points 2 days ago

Can't believe people always use this crypto-spam browser.

[-] pineapple@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 day ago

Same, I was surprised brave is so popular.

[-] Valarie@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 17 hours ago

I use it for school shit because they don't work with iceraven(my preferred mobile Firefox fork)

[-] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

I use it to pirate sports streams and thats pretty much it. It just works better than Firefox for some reason.

[-] JayGray91@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago

Probably because it's chromium based and the sites are chromium optimized

That's my opinion at least

[-] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Brave and Firefox are very competitive when it comes to pushing unnecessary "features" on their users. (Remember when Mozilla bought an NFT and AI company to put a shopping toolbar in their browser?)

[-] megopie@beehaw.org 7 points 1 day ago

Comparing brave and fire fox is like comparing librewolf and chrome. When people suggest using a privacy browser other than brave, they’re not saying “just use fire fox”.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

I'm just speaking on the two most popular browsers according to the survey - LibreWolf is in a league of its own for sure.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 13 points 1 day ago

Matrix is the protocol. Element is the client and just one of many.

[-] digital_digger@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Why is Thunderbird listed with proton mail, tuta and fastmail?

[-] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

They are a provider as well as a client now.

[-] digital_digger@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Interesting. So you can actually create a Thunderbird email address?

[-] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Do you think the statistics are representative of the overall userbase? To me, this suggests recency bias (or maybe people who misunderstood the question, because it made me do a double-take too). Either way, Thunderbird using its established branding and reputation is a great move.

[-] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago

I think Firefox's usage is more, Proton Mail is less, Addy.io is more, DuckDuckGo Email Alias is less, DuckDuckGo search usage is more, Matrix is more (btw Matrix is not app :D), Bitwarden is less, Obsidian is more (unfortunately it's closed-source), uBO is more, Windscribe is more, AI usage is more

[-] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm considering swapping from Proton Mail to Fastmail. The fact that it allows 3-year subscriptions is good (I'd prefer a lifetime plan but I understand why that's a non-starter), the fact that it's based local to me is good too.

EDIT: I wish it also at least offered a rolling 3-year subscription.

[-] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago

Fastmail is hosted in Australia which has some iffy privacy laws thst may affect fadtmail (although fastmail won't sell your data at least) https://www.e4237161d240bc6333d6834ce-19834.sites.k-hosting.co.uk/showthread.php?s=23fc90acb4f52ac90ee43d800bb66a77&t=74082

I have moved to mailbox.org which has been great too. Just offering an alternative in case you are interested in a European host

[-] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

In terms of escaping targeted government surveillance, Australia is not the country to be in. If the Australian government is targeting you, there's no escape.

In terms of escaping mass surveillance and of keeping your personal information private, Australia isn't that bad. Simply by the fact gmail is allowed to operate in the country it isn't great either though.

Strengthening privacy laws around rental property applications is currently the main privacy concern for me, and recent state law changes have marginally improved that.

[-] pfr@piefed.social 1 points 18 hours ago

Same. I moved from FM to Posteo (which is very cheap) AND Tuta. I use both email services for different uses. Tuta for more personal stuff like banking, medical, official gvt stuff like tax, vehicle registration etc. anything that requires my full identity. Then Posteo and Addy.io together for everything else. I never use my main posteo email address, I create aliases for everything. Am three services is only slightly more expensive than FM in total, but I feel it's a much more secure setup

[-] ne0phyte@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

+1 for Fastmail

Since anything but fully on-device encrypted/decrypted mails is still inherently insecure due to being unable to control the receiving end I consider email an insecure medium by default.

That was my reason to go with fastmail when I moved away from Gmail a couple of years ago and I am very happy with their service and apps. I am also paying three years at a time and would like to pay even further ahead of time, but what can you do.

I tried proton but didn't like being locked into using their apps or hosting the SMTP bridge at which point I might as well use a less secure approach to begin with that is more comfortable to use.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You know I just remembered that no one actually confirmed whether DuckDuckGo wasn't just a honeypot for the NSA because it didn't become big until after thr Snowden leaks lol.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
136 points (98.6% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

15636 readers
341 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS