94
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 months ago

I know this is preaching to the choir here, but that is so very out of touch for many/most/all of us.

Those things cost like $5 - $9 in my area, and you can even get the "old" ones for a couple dollars cheaper at times. It costs very little more than raw chicken, and in some cases, the rotisserie chickens cost less. Then you factor in time for cooking, clean-up, products for clean-up, and other time / material costs, and the difference comes out a wash.

So, they are apparently suggesting that having chicken in a meal at all is a splurge. Sure, in some idealistic world where we all eat a vegan diet to save the earth, that might fly. But in the real world, it's literally insane propaganda to suggest that chicken is a splurge.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

These people writing these stories are probably ultra rich, and go to fine dining resteraunts. They probably pay $300 a meal for what you or I might pay $11 at the grocery store.

Then they think if THEY paid $300, then surely the non-privilaged must be paying $600. And they're doing it several times a week! Such splurge!

Meanwhile we could buy these things every day for a month for what they pay for 1 meal. And the quality realistically can't be all that much different. They probably assume they're eating a chicken thats twice as good, at half the cost.

But they don't know who we are! Say that name! Say it loud!!!

LEEEEEEEROOOOOYYYYYY

JEEEEEEEEENNNKKKKIIIIINNNNNSSSS!!!!!!

Least we got chicken....

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

The rotisserie chicken is in fact often a loss leader for grocery stores.

[-] 1dalm@lemmings.world 6 points 3 months ago

And "old" in this case means "cooked this morning".

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

They know there's going to be pushback and people hollering and shouting how out of touch they are for printing it.

They don't care, they're just seeding the public narrative, trying to get people used to seeing the message in media that they should expect less and be content without things.

It's not how we feel about the article today, it's about the kids and young people growing up seeing this message as normal.

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

It's just rage bait. You don't need to read into it any more than that

[-] Solventbubbles@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I can also add, as a vegetarian myself, a vegan diet is nowhere near as cheap.

Unless you have the ability to grow all your own produce and protein, vegans are spending just as much if not more for those calories/proteins.

[-] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Well, you can live on rice and beans pretty well, and simple salad is cheap. But yes, I agree. Vegans pay more than vegetarians, because milk and eggs are cheap.

[-] themaninblack@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

We are regressing back to “a chicken in every pot”.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 18 points 3 months ago

I never bought rotisserie chicken because they were cheap to the point of being suspicious (i.e. what sort of corners are they cutting).

Sort of the opposite of what I would consider a "splurge."

[-] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

They take chickens that are on the sale by date and cook them. At least when I worked deli! So maybe not the nicest chickens but all fine!

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

I remember working on the deli when we'd markdown the chickens. Folks knew when we put them out and how long we waited before doing it. There was generally a little crowd of 2 to 3 folks when we'd do it on the weekend. Sometimes they'd get impatient and ask us if we were gonna come do it. Which, to be honest, I don't really blame them. I don't remember how much of a savings it was but it was significant. It's sort of like "hey buddy, let's stop the charade, I need to get going, can you come mark these down a few minutes early?"

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago

WSJ is absolutely on the money here. We shouldn't be eating rotisserie chickens with all of these plump billionaires to feast on.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Billionaires are just a type of chicken.

[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 months ago

"Gets Community Noted" is such an awkward turn of phrase.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

These rich fucks would complain if you were left nothing but dirt to eat and got an extra grub in a mouthful.

[-] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Rotisserie chicken, used for burritos, can make lunch for the work week.

[-] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Dumbest shit i have ever seen published in a newspaper, I think we all know that's saying quite a lot.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Isn't the journal just another Murdoch product. Thus it's just Fox News in print?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Eeyore_Syndrome@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Anything more than a chicken tender, piece of broccoli and a small tortilla, is gluttony I say!

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Shouldn't you be eating gruel , peasant?

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

I don't know, I think you should be able to eat another thing. Maybe one other thing.

[-] moondoggie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

It’s one rotisserie chicken, Michael. How much could it cost, fifty dollars?

[-] 58008@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

If saving 5 bucks on your grocery bill is the thing that keeps your head above water... you're probably already deep enough to meet the ghost of that OceanGate CEO.

[-] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

When I splurge, I buy hamburger at 9$ a lb.

[-] 1dalm@lemmings.world 3 points 3 months ago

Rotisserie chicken is like the absolute cheapest food a person can buy.

[-] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

It's a loss leader. It's up there with milk and eggs in terms of standard grocery items that are cheaper than they should be.

[-] pohart@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

This is kind of true, but a little misleading. They sell it at a loss because it was about to expire. If it's reaching the sell-by date. They cook it and sell it as a rotisserie chicken to recoup the losses. They're usually only selling it at a loss because that's the alternative to throwing it out.

[-] faythofdragons@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

Which is why it's extra bullshit that you can't use food stamps to buy them. How dare people want to stretch their food budgets, right?

[-] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Cheaper to buy prepared at the grocery near me, in Ontario.

I wonder what the cost is wherever the Wall Street journal people shop.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

Costco’s rotisserie chicken is cheaper than a raw chicken in most places and I don’t need to spend money on utilities to cook it. It’s also gross, but when you’re poor you don’t get a lot of protein options.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

Door Dash fees / inflated prices are what should be the real target. In-game cosmetics would be another.

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah I just want to know what grocery store food Wall Street journal is going to call Gen Alpha privileged for eating. Store brand hummus? Whole wheat bread?

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

Hummus?? BROWN bread?? thats rich people food

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

organic artisnal bread, non gmo, single source, fair traded,,yadayaday.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

US$5 hot rotisserie chicken from Costco is cheaper than a whole raw chicken from grocery outlet. In addition, I have to pay for the electricity and seasoning to cook the chicken.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wallstreet journal... is Microsoft stock going down again?

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

What they hate even more is that we're splurging on living indoors with running water and flush toilets.

[-] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It wasn't that long ago Faux was running stories about these uppity welfare recipients having refrigerators and cell phones, shocking I know

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
94 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21657 readers
480 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS