I already got a phone why do I need another one strapped to my car?
Spoiler: Not a single brand received Mozilla’s Best Of designation, though researchers identified Renault as the least problematic. The European brand must comply with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a stringent law governing the way in which personal data is used, processed, and stored.
Still driving a 2010 because fuck them!!!
I don't have the time or energy but if someone wanted to create a database with all the known ways to disconnect cars from relaying data for everything known searchable by make/model/year they'd be pretty fucking awesome.
Just bought a '22 Bolt because there was a guide to terminate its 4g antenna here: https://imgur.com/gallery/step-by-step-guide-to-disable-onstar-on-2022-chevy-bolt-this-is-reversible-not-permanent-n00QKnH
Depends entirely on your car make and model. On many models you can disconnect or remove the fuse for the telematics control unit (TCU) and it's as simple as that. However you won't receive any OTA updates that will likely solve problems. And if you reconnect to get them, there's no guarantee your car doesn't suddenly dump all your personal data obtained in the meantime onto company servers. Further I find it more and more likely that OEMs either already have or will add a ToS that requires you to keep all this stuff connected, and they'll argue that the data collection is part of the sale.
Slate seems to be the only brand currently that intends to deliver vehicles with zero connectivity required.
Slate seems to be the only brand currently that intends to deliver vehicles with zero connectivity required.
Do you mean these guys? That's the first I heard of them so thank you for that! I thought it would turn out to be a European make, but they're on my side of the pond. A zero-connectivity electric car would be the dream. I like the idea of electric cars but so far they have all been even more wrapped up in telematics than internal combustion cars.
Yes, zero connectivity, relatively affordable, highly customizeable, and repair-friendly (for now). The only connectivity is through the phone app. Only downside is you have to buy a stupid truck. They could have made it a lot cheaper as a coupe.
They could have made it a lot cheaper as a coupe.
Maybe if it sees market success, they'll branch out into other body styles. I want a car too, not a truck.
I think it's a truck for regulatory reasons. Trucks get a pass on a bunch of things that can be a regulatory issue for cars, because of course they do.
They are offering kits to make it a van or SUV. Still no coupe, but better than a truck for many purposes.
CAFE is dead.
Jeff Bezos is a named investor of Slate, so i wouldn't trust it
Would you like to recommend another brand that has zero data connection and also isn't invested with Bezos?
I haven't looked into them really at all, but their phone app I would consider a data connection, also how is it updating that? Just Bluetooth? Maybe they have that info, like I said, I haven't looked into them much yet.
When I had to reluctantly buy a used car, I made it a point to buy a used car no newer than 2015 and this is why. Well this and touchscreen mania.
It's designed to be hell. I primarily know about Honda's practices as a relative bought a new Honda and ran into the same issue laid out in this article.
I drive a vehicle that's over a decade old and have joked with friends and family that if I have to buy a new vehicle I am ripping the whole dashboard out. I imagine I may get blacklisted from local dealerships for my demands, but that is the world we live in.
have joked ... that if I have to buy a new vehicle I am ripping the whole dashboard out.
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
Aside: don't buy into the myth that older cars need more maintenance or cost more to maintain. Its an excellent sales pitch to convince people to keep upgrading but it's not always reality. Modern cars can easily cost more to repair and maintain than older cars because more technology = more that can break. Car manufacturers have, over time, crammed more and more proprietary parts into cars which they can then charge exorbitant amounts for and force you to use their mechanics rather than your local.
I have both an 25+ year old Toyota that's still going strong and still only needs basic maintenance (parts are also easily available and cheap). I also have an 'older' Nissan Leaf EV that is very little maintenance and has nothing in it that reports back to Nissan. It's got a nice balance of technology and most things we can maintain or repair ourselves if we want. Parts for this are also easily accessible and cheap.
I also highly recommend people learn more vehicle maintenance themselves (easier of older cars with less tech) so you can either do things yourself and/or you've got more knowledge yo protect yourself from mechanics and car dealers who try to scam you by repairing/replacing things that don't need it.
Sleeper old car for privacy: the gmt800-cateye full size Chevrolet/gmc pickups or suvs.
You’d think they would be terrible for it because they often have onstar, but that version of onstar uses a 2g connection that literally isn’t in service anymore!
Weird how Renault and Dacia scored least creepy, Nissan most creepy. They're in quite a tight alliance these days.
Other than that, completely in line with big tech and governments: most US brands are more creepy than most European brands.
Renault at least has to apply French privacy laws, which are pretty tough.
I wish there was a solution for this, but it sounds like the only way to fix the problem is regulation.
Good luck with that, we can't bribe this administration as well as the auto lobby can.
I mostly agree. But sometimes if a single jurisdiction gets regulation in place, it can be cheaper for companies to produce a single model to comply with all of them, rather than make multiple models. Even if they do make multiple models, it still means there is a supply of privacy-spec cars.
California in the USA has been more privacy friendly than most states. If California would crank up some car privacy regs, maybe work with the Europeans and Canada on a common legal standard, that is a huge foot in the door! It means people in other US states could buy a California-spec car. If the momentum builds enough, maybe companies would say screw it and sell the privacy-spec cars everywhere. That happened in the past with car safety regs. It went from auto companies whining about it, to the same companies featuring it as a selling point. Look how well our cars do in crash tests!
I agree car privacy is going to be a hard fight. Auto companies will fight dirty to avoid privacy regs. But we can push on this. A groundswell of public support can't hurt.
We just got a new car, first "modern" one I've had basically ever, and this has been one of my biggest concerns since we got it, but there really don't seem to be any straightforward solutions yet.
Constantly play music/fart noises/whatever from an external source while you drive to minimize the audio data collected.
For sure. We're in a difficult place. Arguably the ultimate solution has to be regulatory, but we don't have that yet. All we have is whatever the community can figure out on its own. The more surveillance gets integrated into complex automotive systems, the less approch-able it is for average people to yank a fuse or unscrew an antenna coupler.
Look at Slate Auto if you are in the usa. I heard about this on the Privacy Guides forum. There is a possibility of them moving into Canada, which has got me interested.
My next car will be an air cooled Porsche for many reasons this being but one.
I really would like to do an EV conversion on an older car. Maybe a 240SX or a 350Z. Or a Honda Insight. Or even a Nissan GTT (which I only just learned existed). But you're talking $$$$ there for what is (most importantly) a relatively unsafe vehicle to drive.
There’s a Canadian gent on jeep forum.com converting a CJ5 to electric that you might want to check out. He’s using pretty standard industrial stuff to do the conversion and it looks like it’s going pretty well for him, a welder and math can get you a long way in an EV conversion
I would need a place to do any of that first. And a whole lot of cash. You can't finance an EV conversion.
I'm pretty new to Lemmy and noticed that my post was crossposted to fuckcars and privacy@programming.dev. I have no problem with that, but I didn't do it on purpose!
Fun fact: at least one of the fuckcars mods cares deeply about this issue, to the point that he only owns older cars to avoid telemetry.
(Source: it's me, I'm that mod.)
Anyway, don't be shy; feel free to crosspost on-topic stuff like this there yourself if you want!
Why would a fuckcars mod own a car?
Because I still live in a car-centric shithole country.
Also, I'm a car enthusiast, believe it or not. I think cars should be treated the same way as horses: a fun hobby, but insane to use for basic transportation. Among the other benefits good urbanism brings, not needing a car makes me free to own interesting ones instead of reliable ones.
This comment means I'm gonna go sub there lol
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)