39
submitted 1 week ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43334510

The Department of Justice spoke four separate times to a woman who credibly accused Donald Trump of having sex with a minor he met through Jeffrey Epstein—but most accusations against the president appear to have been removed from the government’s documents on the alleged sex trafficker. 

21-page slideshow buried in the massive trove of Epstein-related documents included allegations that sometime between 1983 and 1985, Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens. When the woman bit down on Trump’s exposed penis, he allegedly punched her in the head and kicked her out. That same woman told the DOJ that Epstein had introduced her to Trump in 1984.

Yet last week, Attorney General Pam Bondi insisted that there was “no evidence” that Trump had committed any crime—adding to the growing pile of denials from Trump officials that constitute a sweeping cover-up of the president’s alleged wrongdoing. 

Justice Department records indicate that the FBI spoke to this woman not once but at least four separate times, according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger. Now those records appear to have been removed from public viewing—despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires all documents relating to the alleged sex trafficker to be made public. 

Sollenberger discovered a record of four separate interviews, which took place in the summer of 2019, in a separate database of documents downloaded from the government’s public files on Epstein. That document indicated that the first of the four interviews was conducted on July 24, 2019, and the last conducted on October 16, 2019. That document was given to Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers as part of her trial, though the specific allegations predated Maxwell’s involvement with Epstein, Sollenberger wrote.

The woman’s first interview was entered into the FBI’s case files on August 9, 2019, just one day before Epstein was found dead in his jail cell. FBI agents typically have a deadline of five working days to file interview write-ups, indicating an abnormal 16-day gap, Sollenberger noted.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Welcome to fascism. Just couldn't vote for Harris? You did this.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

But Harris didn’t say she was going to solve all the world’s problems immediately! She wanted to personally murder every single Palestinian person. Or something.

[-] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Are we just going to ignore that the DOJ had all of these documents while Biden was president and just twiddled their thumbs apparently?

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Who wrote this shit, "...Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens.." so a teenager or child and not a woman then?

[-] Daviino@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Always the same language. Same deal with underaged black versus white kids. One is called a young man, the other a kid. Guess who is who.

[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Yes. The allegation should be phrased that he beat and raped a child.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

We need to have a simple check in the government and media. Everyone who thinks a 13 year old is a woman please stand on this side of the room. Everyone else please leave the room. Then we drone strike the room with the earthquake bomb.

[-] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

US media keeps calling the children in the Epstein files women for some reason. It’s been an ongoing theme. German speaking media will occasionally use the German word for minor, but they often also just lazily translate from US sources and use the German word for women/woman.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 week ago

It's called sane washing. The US media is owned by people who are likely in the files too.

[-] gnutrino@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

I think the intended meaning is that she was a woman when the allegations were made but the (alleged) events took place when she was in her early teens.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

She's a woman now, and was when the interviews occurred over 30 years after the sexual assaults.

The woman was sexually assaulted when she was in her early teens.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Loterally says "Forced a woman"

[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

mOsT tRanSpaReNt PreSiDeNt EvEr

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

tbf, establishment dems/R's have kept this shit under wraps much more tightly for...decades, obviously. with zero intention of ever holding anyone accountable

unironically the most transparent president/administration ever, because he's too unawares/dementiad to even remotely control his projections and the jackals he's got running the place are so proud in their corruption they carry it out openly

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

So it's "transparency through incompetence", the corrolary to "security through obscurity"

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Despite his efforts it's looking pretty transparent that he raped children.

Sometimes I wish I could be a believer in religion so that I might have solace that evil people will at least face divine justice in death even if they received no Earthly justice in life. Alas, the depressing truth is that evil coasts through life without facing justice all the time, and the good just as often fall victim to the machinations, crimes, and sadism of the evil and never find any justice, retribution or closure after it. It's one of the reasons that I don't believe unfortunately.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

I kinda feel like the best part about being non-religious is the knowledge that everyone faces the same justice in the end. Entropy and all that.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't really see how ceasing to exist is justice, nor how the fact that your nana and Hitler had the same ending is a comfort. But to each their own, I guess.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

I said the best thing, didn't say comfort. If you're looking for comfort, you need to wish harder. All we got left here for justice is philosophy and bureaucracy and bureaucracy ain't helping us right now.

The ultimate justice isn't any worldly punishment it's the knowledge that without something to establish true permanence, the impact of any action anyone could take is eventually negligible and everyone is punished the same. The punishment for your crimes is always being eventually forgotten and having the remnants of your life lost to time. For some that might take longer, but regardless of how it might make us feel, they'll all get there.

Sometimes that can feel like a good thing and sometimes that can feel like a bad thing. Feel like it varies depending on your outlook on life at the moment.

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Didn't Hitler shoot himself?

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Didn't your nana?

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don't even know what to say about how ham-fisted and just plain dumb this attempt to rewrite history is. What's depressing is that for far too many people, it'll still work.

If we make it through this, history textbooks are going to need to have chapters on what cult-think does to people, and like half of it will be about MAGA.

[-] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

You mean like Hitler and Germany?

We already have history textbooks about this..... there's even a pretty popular book that is a great allegory for what's going on. Based sometime in the 1980s I believe.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The internet has given us a nice archive of the thoughts of brainwashing victims that didn't exist in Nazi Germany.

Personally I think Brave New World is a better representation of our dystopia than 1984. People aren't trying to avoid thoughtcrime because they're afraid of a boot to the neck (yet) but are instead lulled into complacency by a "keep your head down" culture and lulled into complicity by a "choose your own truth" media landscape.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

More evidence tampering

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

god help me my dad will huff and puff about biden this and biden that and some made up 'good' shit trump did whenever more trump shit comes out.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

So Jeffrey Epstein is pretty much just another partner or employee Trump threw under the bus. And I'm beginning to think it's more the former.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Why are they allowed to take stuff down? We need the remaining files still and they’re allowed to take shit down?

[-] Hazor@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

They're allowed because who's going to stop them?

They're not allowed by law - they're allowed simply by being in control of who enforces the law. This kind of government corruption would normally be investigated by the DOJ... Except it's the DOJ doing it, and the only people who might be able to anything about that (the legislature and judiciary) are complicit.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Half of America needs to go to Washington and demand arrests

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So the FBI had an interview about the then president sexually assaulting/raping a child and them punching her in the face when it didn't go his way. The interview evidence gets mishandled and instead of taking 5 business days required to file it took 12 business days. The next day the person who connected the President to these charges is found dead. With his brother requesting a secondary otopsy because he believed his brother was murdered, and the review showed they did not believe the death to be suicide. And the footage mysteriously having issues as well. And the people who moved the body had no recollection of removing a noose.

This is nothing but a conspiracy, lol

[-] Safetyshaft@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I’m convinced that kiddiefucker is alive and well

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)

News

36309 readers
498 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS