99
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 81 points 1 day ago
[-] somename@hexbear.net 45 points 23 hours ago

Unironically, for a lot of power players. A lot of times it all gets rolled into one mega faction, in people's minds, but a lot of Trump's decisions upset a ton of powerful people. Not the fascism of course, but fucking with trade and commerce.

A countervailing force finally hit. Wouldn't be surprised if there were plenty of "concerned representatives" making contact with Supreme Court members.

[-] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 31 points 22 hours ago

major blow to the president

billdawg

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 22 points 21 hours ago

It'll be so funny if Trump responds by packing the court

[-] Sickos@hexbear.net 15 points 21 hours ago

He responded by saying "OK" then then enacting more tarriffs

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 11 points 21 hours ago

Or he could "fire" them by sending them on a permanent vacation to Gitmo and right away putting in his own guys and women as an "emergency official act".

Or best of all - he sends them to Gitmo and he becomes the supreme court. Everything happens on Truth Social. The "arguments" are bullet points and not longer. Trump then watches teevee and his aides check social media for him. In the next day or two Trump issues his ruling: "deal", "no deal", "bad deal", "super deal", "too stupid deal" etc.

[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 48 points 1 day ago

Well great, I guess I can kiss the fifty billion dollars I invested in building new factories goodbye!

[-] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 34 points 23 hours ago

How many battalions answer to the Supreme Court?

[-] dkr567@hexbear.net 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Too bad the damage has already been done by the US regime based on price increases in almost everything and so on. It's not like prices are going to go down after this.

[-] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 8 points 22 hours ago

To understand Trump's view of economy, one must imagine the economy as a 14 year old child...

[-] OgdenTO@hexbear.net 56 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hmm. I hope Trump doesn't just go ahead and ignore them

And surely companies will lower their prices again because they're not being charged more for regular shit

[-] nfreak@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 day ago

Surely he wouldn't do that, fascists always abide by the rules

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 44 points 1 day ago

As of the middle of December, IEEPA tariffs had raised about $130 billion, according to the latest data available from U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Trump has touted much higher numbers, up to $3 trillion.

lmao. Wharton math.

[-] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 11 points 21 hours ago

Tbf his best buddy jeff was more of the numbers guy

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 46 points 1 day ago

i think this one's kind of interesting because at this point the judiciary seems to me to be playing the most pure distillation of the expression of the opinions of capital on trump admin policies, so this i think in some sense represents capital formally telling trump that they don't like the tariffs. it will be interesting to see how that develops. i think trump will probably just keep levying them one way or the other, but the tension with capital might be interesting. or maybe they'll just fall in line behind the fuhrer, not sure yet.

[-] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 10 points 21 hours ago

Capital knows only one master, itself. And it does not share power.

~Gandalf Marx

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 40 points 1 day ago

Let's see ol' Donny wriggle his way out of this one

[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 26 points 23 hours ago

Apparently there are literally hundreds of lawsuits related to tariff refunds in US courts right now. Wonder if any of those will be significant

[-] hamid@crazypeople.online 14 points 21 hours ago

This was the plan all along to starve the beast. They passed all their tax cuts and were all in on tariffs to make up the rest and now the controlled opposition removed the tariffs so they have no choice but to implement broad austerity.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 6 points 22 hours ago

Does it actually matter though? The supreme court is in Trump's pocket, no?

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 14 points 21 hours ago

It's also PR for GOP SCOTUS to make them seem reasonable for some of their upcoming rulings this summer - some of which will be grotesque: Birthright Citizenship, the Voting Rights Act, etc.

[-] MarxMadness@hexbear.net 11 points 21 hours ago

The Supreme Court is currently controlled by a bunch of Federalist Society freaks. It's the culmination of a decades-long conservative project to rig the federal judiciary in their favor. As with many pre-Trump conservatives, there's a lot of overlap in goals, but also some significant points of disagreement.

It's also an institution that takes a much longer view than Trump. There is at least some desire to maintain the legitimacy of the courts.

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
99 points (100.0% liked)

news

24624 readers
589 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS