62
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by avidamoeba@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

The numbers:

  • Poilievre, CPC 13.7%
  • Lewis, NDP 42.6%
  • Carney, Liberal 39.5%
  • May, Green 2.3%
  • Another Cand. 1.9%

Source: https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/post/can-avi-lewis-begin-an-ndp-comeback-in-beaches-east-york

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

Let's not jinx it folks.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

I shoulda voted Lewis. Oh well he was my second choice and Rob prolly won't win so.. 😅

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago

CBC's Power and Politics panelists are starting to talk as if Avi won lol, because of the donation amounts.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's a good predictor and he leads by a lot. So I think that's fair.

What I want to hear and see is the signs of bricks forming in some asses as they get to discuss this poll. I hope it's discussed at Good Talk this Friday too. 😅

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Definitely Philip J Fournier and Eric Grenier might pick it up on The Writ podcast they do separately. They've lately have not been finding much notable movement on the NDP and Alberta Liberal support has their attention the most... but this surely will come up on Thursday for them. I can edit and link to the episode once I see it.

Direct link to them talking about Beaches EY: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS4-YBCRQEk&t=1460

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I follow The Numbers, I'll watch this week's episode! 😁

E:

Direct link to them talking about Beaches EY: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS4-YBCRQEk&t=1460

Thank you baby!

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Episode is out. The swing is interesting but they do note it could all be moot if Erskine-Smith decides not to leave The Beaches-East York federal riding.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

I'll watch in a bit.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Using useless polls to sway public opinion just seems so american.

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

not so much 'sway' rather many of us haven't seen this jagmeed-less ndp move yet, i'll listen to them more then i'll listen to the cons, the greens or the Quebecers rn, they're a good opposition to carney, who is a soft conservative more interested in the number then touchy feeliy things, but not a monster in a suit like i suspect PP might be.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Good. We need real change in this country and an end to liberal and conservative madness.

[-] ieGod@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

What's the purpose of this hypothetical?

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

I think it's to gauge the level of support the NDP could get depending on the result of the leadership campaign. They polled two NDP leadership candidates. Lewis is the only one that beat the libs.

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

its cope lolololol,

no but for real this is actually interesting.this is showing that con are now the 3rd wheel thank to trump and pp similarity to him here. as someone who doesn't feel to strongly associated with the liberal (way too touchy feeliy and not focusing on more impotent things like the economy and real workers rights) and don't really like everything about the cons points (especially rn since if your against any of these crazy argument they make you painted as not a real conservative) its why i like carney, political mild and focusing on more important aspect of our country during this crucial time.

Im not against the NDP but i think we can all agree Jagmeed did not do a good job at all, he got dental for the brokeist folks around which is good but everything else is lacking and I (no body else this is just my crackpot theory since i have no definitive proof) that he was helping harbor Indian separatist terrorist (the Khalistani), and is the real reason behind the alliance with Justin. look them up and you'll likely agree they're sus as fuck even if they've not been violent recently) for those reasons i, never really like the man and it seems a lot of people seemed to agree as he got booted roughly after Justin did, (also you'll note that the RCMP announced it would begin monitoring that group after those 2 got the boot, funny coincidence ay ;)

but enough about my mad ravings, i know little about the party these days so i hope to god there an actual contender next election, i could go either way but carney is doing ok in my eyes so i wanna see something good come from the ndp in the news more.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Anti Zionazi foreign policy, with more containment of US relationship, platform is an easy opportunity to win in most NATO colonies, and in fact in US. You can overcome the Zionist supremacist funding by disqualifying the opponents receiving it.

[-] West_of_West@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

Not a huge fan of Lewis, I'm still hoping for Ashton.

[-] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Its convenient to support all the Covid stimulus funded entirely via printed money and BoC QE, and then state we need to make everything publically owned because of greedflation. At what point is it the governments own lack of desire to raise taxes to pay for anything thats at fault?

Trudeau had a generational fairness capital gains tax, that seems like a more sensible solution to future inflation.

[-] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I'm right pissed that they reversed the increase in capital gains tax. Capital gains should be taxed as income (but with capital losses allowed to be used to offset). The planned increase from ½ to ⅔ inclusion beyond $10K (iirc?) didn't go nearly far enough. I guess, sure, ½ inclusion to $10K likely makes sense, to encourage more Canadians to invest at all, but people pulling in $100K+/yr from their investments shouldn't be taxed on only 50% of their investment gains.

It's insane that capital owners pay less tax than working class Canadians. (I mean working class in the "need to work to live" original definition, not "low-education worker" meaning).

[-] maplesaga@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Agreed its bullshit, and I don't actually believe it was put in to do anything but make Trudeau a scapegoat to install Carney.

As with Freeland's letter, it all seemed highly coordinated.

this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
62 points (95.6% liked)

Canada

12007 readers
567 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS