116
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Soulphite@reddthat.com 65 points 1 month ago
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

If lemmy had an equivilent of retweeting, I would.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago

There is a minimum-amount of fission-fuel required, AND there is a minimum-amount of conventional-explosives required to compress the fission-fuel until it goes supercritical.

That detonator isn't going to be small-enough to hide in a vest.

Absolute disinformation.

_ /\ _

[-] Soulphite@reddthat.com 23 points 1 month ago

JD should stick to fucking couches, not nuclear physics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is stupid for even more reasons than that. I've thought about it back when North Korea had pretend nuclear suicide bombers march on their military parade.

Even if somehow they manage to cram one in a backpack that is carriable by a person, there is no advantage whatsoever given the blast radius. You will have to use a vehicle of sorts to get near the enemy and more importantly away from your friendlies anyway. Whatever distance you can cover on foot afterwards won't make much of a difference. Might as well make it vehicle borne.

[-] Ariselas@piefed.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I mean, yeah, the Davie Crockett could fit in a back pack, a really big back pack 0hPf1HdHAWM2L90.webp

[-] sulfidedisburseangledafternoontipper@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, the W54 was small enough to be carried by a person and I don't think anyone wants even a 1kt device going off near them. So it's within the realm of possibility even if it does strain credulity as an actual goal Iran was working toward (let alone a solid justification for this bullshit).

Edit: the W54 weighed 51lb (23 kg).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago

These fuckers are so inept at propaganda, it's kinda sad.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Dont underestimate the stupidity of their target audience, and the arrogant complacency of his opposition. Its why we have him in the first place. Twice. Half of the second group is still probably going to sit out the primaries and midterms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 21 points 1 month ago

'Iran could develop hulk technology and teleport directly into US schools!' JD Vance

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

As if they would ever be concerned about potential violence in schools

[-] inari@piefed.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Does it negatively affect my billionaire friends? ...is the only question they care about

[-] volore@scribe.disroot.org 16 points 1 month ago

This is the same JD Vance that repeatedly falsely claimed immigrants were eating cats and dogs in his home state, is it not?

I'm not saying a nuclear suicide vest couldn't be done. I'm just saying, JD Vance has claimed lots of things.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Id argue a rapist president plus a complicit govt is more dangerous. How about getting rid of those first?

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

It's like that man or bear situation, but the US Gov't or some hypothetical rando Iranian Nuclear Suicide Bomber?

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Seems fairly obvious

[-] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

American civilians killed by Iran made nuclear slingshots and slippping on nuclear banana peels.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

This shit again? Last time it was a brief case dirty bomb.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Also known as a snuke

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The demonic ritual of human sacrifice

[-] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Thats.......not how nuclear arms work.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Isn't the smallest effective nuke the Davy Crocket? Pretty sure it's warhead is still the size of a large hardcase suitcase.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maybe a dirty bomb with nuclear materials, but an actual fission bomb on a vest? No. Never mind they don't have the enriched fuel, never mind just building a working device would be extremely difficult for them and that would be large like the Hiroshima bomb.

This is Iraq Weapons of Mass Distraction all over again. Fuck this administration.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 1 month ago

"Vance says" is like when my 3-year-old blames everything on the cat. Who ate all the nesquik Jonathan, was it the cat, or was it you with nesquik on your face? Who can say.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago

Nuclear terrorism might be a thing, but I seriously doubt that the easiest way to do it is nuclear suicide vests. Miniaturizing nuclear warheads is a pain. If you were going to do something like that, you'd be better off doing something akin to a truck bomb.

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Much more likely would be a dirty bomb. Just a regular bomb with some nuclear material that it spreads. The nuclear material isn't the bomb itself, but used exclusively for the exposure effects. You don't even need plutonium or uranium for this. There are plenty of other radiological sources to make dirty bombs. Old radiographic medical equipment for instance.

There are hundreds of thousands of orphaned sources in the world. Several of them have caused the worst radiological incidents in history.

The fact we don't see this already is quite surprising.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 5 points 1 month ago

I'm kind of skepitical of the "dirty bomb" idea. Frankly, it sounds like a load of bullshit, because of the πr^2^ thing. Namely, if you want to irradiate and area to a sufficient extent to cause immediate radiation sickness, then keeping it concentrated is your best bet. A very small bomb, at most.

The other extreme would be a huge bomb to spread radioactive material over, say, a city. At which point it barely raises the radioactivity above background levels. Or at least doesn't cause immediately apparent effects. Imagine terrorists issuing a statement like, "Sure, it doesn't seem so bad TODAY, but wait 'til you see the slight bump in cancer rates in 20 years."

Indeed, on looking it up, I see that the experts are skeptical, too, and tests conducted by Israel didn't find much effectiveness. That could be why we haven't seen one used.

[-] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, but destruction and loss of life isn't the point. Terror is. If a dirty bomb was detonated in a city, and it contained enough nuclear material to say, cause a 10% jump in cancer outlooks over a 20 year period, that's not the point.

The point is that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission needs to come out, shut a city down, do all sorts of testing, clean the shit out of everything, and disrupt everyone's lives. The fear is the point, and as a fear-causing weapon, radiation is in a unique class all its own.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago

For that matter, then you don't need to put any radioactive material in it at all, but just claim it.

[-] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 2 points 1 month ago

I think the value would be the 'terror' in the general public if a dirty bomb went in downtown in any major US city.

I think that would make for an ideal terrorist weapon for use against the US

Fuck - I'm probably on a watch list again. I think I was flagged post 9/11 for online chat around laptops, bottles of water and vodka. Every flight I took from 2000 to about 2007 I was pulled out and patted down/bag searched/turn laptop on/...

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ScientifficDoggo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I'm not that surprised. Radiation poisoning is a special kind of torture for EVERYONE. Shit would immediately invalidate any goodwill or sympathy for whomever uses them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] androgynouscloudmoon@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

Reminder that it's a news org's job to find and report facts, instead of writing more about the new nonsense coming out of the mouths of science deniers. Obviously this is logistically impossible and just another "THEY ALMOST HAVE NUKES!!" excuse to bomb Iranians ffs

[-] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The US is incentivizing Iran to make nukes.

[-] KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 4 points 1 month ago

When will this lying sack of shit starting painting his face orange?

[-] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

And my dick could grow 15" over night

[-] Naich@piefed.world 4 points 1 month ago

Just a reminder that the 9/11 attackers did it with knives.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Kinda wild, I vividly remember getting on a plane to Disney with my grandparents as a child (Pre 9/11). My grandpa had a swiss army knife on him when we went through security. I asked him how he was able to get that through, and he said it's a small knife; nothing to worry about. It's legal as long as it's smaller than my palm. I said what if someone brought a knife like that and stabbed the pilot. He laughed it off and said I watch too much TV. Then 9/11 happened and guess how they did it? How did 8 year old me have more sense than whoever was running airports in those days?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Iran could turn their front line soldiers into beings of pure energy and they could rip the life force right out of a tank.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

POWER OVERWHELMING

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] root@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The fear mongering

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 month ago

This just in: USA developing suicide vests for add/rsf.

[-] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Why would anyone believe this? Who is ret*rded enough to believe this?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
116 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21373 readers
117 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS