44
Maga is so incredibly good at picking the biggest possible losers to rally behind
Theyve got the pillow guy, the couch guy, and the kid raper. Fun group.
the kid raper
And the puppy killer, and the douchy podcaster, and the richest man in the world that can't stop acting like he's on 4chan, Jewish space lasers lady, the woman that married the guy that exposed himself to her as a minor, and Ted Cruz
Jewish space lasers lady rage-quit because she finally got it through her dumbass skull that pedo-in-chief wasn't actually going after the pedos.
Yeah, I don't believe her. I think it's just a different grift, not a genuine change of heart.
I believe that she was a QAnon true believer, but finally getting disillusioned from that doesn't somehow redeem her from continuing to be a vile piece of shit in every other possible way.
I thought I remember reading that she wanted some kind of promotion, maybe a cabinet postition or something but was passed over, so she left that group of grifters to start her own.
She wanted to be a senator, but Donny wouldn’t endorse her over some other republican asshole, plus I think she saw some of the Epstein stuff and was offended by it. But that could be just an attempt at revenge for the lack of endorsement
And whatever these two weirdos are.
"Keep still, Their vision is based on morons."
Pillow CEO in legal trouble in conservative conference in Gaylord, Texas.. Man this timeline just getting lazy
Is it me, or is there something inherently funny about CPAC being in a place called "Gaylord?"
I'd like to see the traffic for Grindr there this week.
Run real fast and do equations in your head, Morty!
This video clip is a perfect analogy for how the rich can treat our legal system. For everyone else, there's Ice killing Alex Pretti.
Poor Mike went from snorting cocaine to now snorting Ajax cleaner cut with Ajax cleaner.
Ah yes, because professional process servers are "deranged leftists" now.
Oh god please let him get held in contempt for failure to appear 🤣
It’s such an open look into their way of thinking (and how they want us to think of it too); anyone holding someone on the right accountable to actual law is doing so to weaponize the law against them, due to political ideology and not you know, holding up the law.
Remember, fascists see ethics as such: law protects but does not bind them, and binds but does not protect anyone outside their preferred in-group.
Which means that's exactly what they're doing when they exercise the law against someone. Every accusation is an admission of guilt.
After much back-and-forth, Lindell finally grabbed the papers and tossed them on the floor.
Thats awesome! There's now video proof he was served and he can't deny he never wasn't.
Process servers take note of this. If you want your target to accept the papers, simply have a second person attempting an interview.
YO MIKE
Is your boy Trump helping you out with your legal fees?
I thought you were going to get a spot in his administration for all the help you gave him.
I'm sure he'll get around to it.
Anyway, have the life you earned, cumstain.
"What they're doing is illegal!"
"Sir, you're being served with papers for a crime you've committed"
"I don't have time for this, I'm on TV!"
After much back-and-forth, Lindell finally grabbed the papers and tossed them on the floor.
Fool. He accepted the papers. No one cares that he then littered. She won.
can she prove it? Hard to say, if only he was on TV
And people say there's no good news.
...only to pick the documents off the floor when the cameras were off.
Grapevine, Texas, at the Gaylord resort.
Yes that a real place, its near the mall. My question if this dumbfuck is running for governor of Minnesota why the fuck he doing in Texas? Also how thought all the lawsuits would have bury this motherfucker?
The description originally stated Gaylord, Texas, which is not a real city name. I should know, I lived there before, during and after the Gaylord Texan opened.
They keep propping him back up when he collapses? It's really weird, he must have some dirt on chief Cheeto. If he becomes governor of Minnesota, you'll know the whole game is rigged because there is not a reality on earth where they would vote that dumbass in.
Yeah if he wins we will know Musk did rigg the machines. I know he did so to help Trump.
This happened where?????
Are you one of today's 10,000 ?
I don't know, might be more than 10k on that one
lol. lmao even.
You just know there are people he burned in business back on the 80s that are just enjoying the absolute shit out of this guys non-stop never-ending downward spiral.
Guy hasnt had a good day since January 6th 2021. Even in this administration.
I'm not familiar with this "serving papers" thing. Can someone ELI5 (and not American)?
What's the legal aspect of having to physically give someone some documents?
It's basically "Hi, here's some documentation informing you of legal proceedings against you. You now have no excuse to say you didn't know about it and are legally required to participate in the proceedings."
The person that serves the papers stands as the witness to the specific individual receiving said papers. Rather than mailing them and the papers just being ignored and people playing dumb about it to try to get out of whatever is going on for as long as possible.
If I'm missing something someone is more than welcome to come add onto or correct me if I'm wrong.
Not necessarily against you specifically being prosecuted. They can also serve a subpoena to you if you are required as a witness on a case.
That's what happened to me.
The weird part was that when I was handed the papers I thought it was about a completely different case that was going to require me as a witness. This is weird because the only two times in my entire life I was (or thought I would be) subpoenaed happened at exactly the same time on two completely unrelated cases.
This about sums it up. But I will add that there's also a subtype of bounty hunters who's whole job is to track folks down to serve papers. Not really much to add past that just a fun fact.
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
44 points (100.0% liked)
politics
29279 readers
753 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS