18
submitted 2 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/world@lemmy.world
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Asetru@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago
[-] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 7 points 2 months ago
[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

At least it wasnt the front. Can't have that happening.

[-] hemmetti@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Nothing that duct tape won’t fix.

[-] lauha@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

'tis but a scratch!

[-] kamenlady@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Just needs a good clean up

[-] stephen@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 months ago

It’ll buff out.

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago
[-] brap@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Wouldn’t have got damaged if you left that shit at home and stopped fucking with people.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

As the title says, its clearly just "damaged", not "lost" or "destroyed", right. The front part and the very back edge of the tail look perfectly fine-- just dirty is all. Shouldnt be counted as a loss, merely in need of repair. Our fleet of AWACS remains at 16.

/s

[-] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

The front didn't even fall off, clearly just damaged.

[-] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Not old enough to remember, but did the us have similar losses during Bush's war? Or is the military just completely incompetent now under the leadership of a bunch of pedos

[-] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

To put it simply, the US did lose more troops and equipment in 1991 and 2003 than currently, but also achieved their objectives, so to speak.

Then again, the 1991 war was a real war with with close to 1 million troops taking part. Currently, what we have is basically two countries lobbing missiles at each other.

Ironically, in 1991, it was the US that was using drones against Iraq. Tables have kinda turned.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Sort of. Iraq couldn't hit back like this, but the US certainly suffered more losses over the entire war, just because of the duration.

Iraq didn't have the equipment, training, or motivation to really resist the overwhelming US and coalition forces. Iran is better-equipped, better-trained, and has an almost fanatical devotion to the Ayatollah, especially in the IRGC. Iran is also upwards of 90% Shia, while Saddam was Sunni and repressed the ~60% Shia and Kurdish population.

[-] Pholous@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

Also Trump's USA neither has a real coalition nor a foothold to launch an army from into Iran.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago

almost fanatical devotion to the Ayatollah, especially in the IRGC

Well the US has a fanatical devotion to their pedo king, especially amongst maga, so much in common, they even prey to the sane god.

[-] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

Iran is a completely different beast to Iraq.

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Looks like it's just one letter off.

[-] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Bruh, we're invading the Fremen. This is how Trump burns down US military infrastructure the same as Russia did theirs.

Way to leave China as the undisputed world power there.

[-] philpo@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago

Which one? The first Bush-Iraq war? Yep. Not as blatant,but generally yeah.

The second one? Nope, the country pretty much was in shambles already.

[-] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

The second one? Nope, the country pretty much was in shambles already.

Coalition losses during 1991 Desert Storm were around 300. For the 2003 invasion and occupation, the losses were of about 5000. Though I think they lost more aircraft during the former.

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
18 points (100.0% liked)

World News

56386 readers
401 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS