118
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago

So he is building his own Fuhrer bunker.

[-] raman_klogius@ani.social 29 points 1 month ago

Ah, so the headline is worded wrong.

He's not seething, he's führerious!

And we all know what he did last in his bunker

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Made his best artwork ever!

I mean just consider the dedication needed to make a pièce de résistance right as the Red Army is almost at the doors, using nothing but the raw concrete walls of the Führerbunker as canvas, his trusty Walther PPK as brush, and his own grey matter as paint... I'd dare say it's the most consequential piece of art of the 20th and maybe even the 21st century. It's a shame it was destroyed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's more like a Führer rape dungeon, knowing the Epstein files.

[-] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

Stargate data center. Oracle hardware running Grok to spy on everyone. The White house already has an underground bunker of that sort.

[-] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

He really wants the chance to do the funniest thing ever.

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Let's just go ahead and give him that gun with two bullets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homes@piefed.world 1 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Sure sounds like someone who is making plans to stay in office past this term.

[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

He go in bunker, we weld shut from the outside. Everybody win!

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Or he is preparing for somebody who is coming after him.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I think he deadass plans on holing himself up in a secret bunker and getting McDonald’s delivered every night. I bet his cover story would be something like a secret daily ritual and it wouldn’t even occur to him that the new president might keep in friendly enough contact with previous presidents to compare notes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] modus@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago
[-] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

God is Dead. USA is a rotting corpse.

Regular people should be taking advantage of the worlds disorder right now. Reclaim humanity.

Billionaires and their companies...

If only Iran would start going after the companies supporting data centers and the tech bro dependencies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 17 points 1 month ago

The cost keeps increasing. That's hilarious.

But of course he was building a bunker. There's literally no surprises there. It'll be the new den of rape for sure.

[-] QueenMidna@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

It's not a bunker, it's a data center. Just a hardened one.

[-] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

We figured this out months ago, but the media didn't report it at all. It was never about the ballroom, always the bunker underneath.

[-] immobile7801@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago

I honestly thought there was already a bunker under the WH. Too many movies I guess.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

There absolutely is along with some of the best medical facilities in the world and more food and weapons than anywhere else nearby, they just tend to put POTUS on AF1 to stay mobile during duress but that place is a fortress on top of a bunker fortress.

[-] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Don't forget the unsigned presidential pardons. The Payday gang hasn't hit them yet.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

That's for war, this one is for child rape.

[-] 1dalm@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago

Is anyone surprised? I mean, did you guys think it was really a $300 million dollar ballroom?

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 17 points 1 month ago

Is anyone surprised?

Yeah, kinda. I assumed it was a $90 million ballroom with the remaining $210 million being funneled to cronies.

[-] celeste@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago

I thought he was pocketing it

[-] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Have you seen the room where he does press conferences?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

After big tech hurled money at him we should have all automatically assumed there's an underground datacenter in the works there.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 7 points 1 month ago

This won't be finished in time for him to use it so I guess someone else is pushing for the bunker and they decided to put a ballroom on top to get his approval.

[-] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Or perhaps the contractors involved are giving him or his associates kickbacks from a construction scam, so, it doesn’t need to be finished ever for him to benefit.

[-] Small_Quasar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh, that's definitely happening, regardless of anything else. I bet you Washington has started including necessary corruption in cost analysis the same way Banana Republics do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] titanicx@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Hey look at that. That one dude that posted the stuff here 6 months ago or so about the designs and plans and mentioned how all of the donors were related to people that are doing underground data centers and stuff like that for Israel are the same group that are working on this with none of the other people that should be involved with ballrooms like Tiffany and stuff like that being associated.

[-] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It's also important to note that someone else wanted that to happen and trump personally really wants a ballroom that's bigger and gaudier than obamas.

[-] Bubs12@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 month ago

Building a bunker at the White House is probably the most useful and appropriate allocations of funds Trump has done.

It’s a low bar, as they say.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Probably would've scurried into it when he loses the 2028 run

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Good. We can seal the doors, cut the power, and leave him and his cronies to rot in there forever.

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Quickly Mr. President, help me bring the guests to your fancy ballroom a cask of amontillado we keep in the secret bunker.

[-] Heikki2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure he was bragging about the bunker months ago, while on the shitter on Air Farce One with the door open

[-] Aeao@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Dumb dumb: the ballroom is under budget!

Citizens: the 200 million ballroom that is now 400 million? That ballroom is under budget? Under the doubled budget expected?

[-] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

If there is two things trump is a expert on its stupid and lawsuit. Its just one thing with him though.

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

At least we can hope the nukes won't fly until the bunker is done so we have at least 3-4 years to change something.

[-] patruelis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Omfg, he's so fking dumb. Idiocracy!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
118 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29839 readers
352 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS