155
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

On Friday, the Idaho Senate passed the most extreme anti-transgender bathroom ban in the United States: a law that applies to both public buildings and private businesses and carries severe criminal penalties. A first offense would be a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail; a second offense within five years would be a felony carrying up to five years in state prison. But the penalties do not stop there. Under Idaho's persistent violator statute, a transgender person convicted of a fourth bathroom offense—their third felony—could face a mandatory minimum of five years and up to life in prison, immediately making Idaho the harshest state in the nation for criminalizing transgender people. Those who find themselves behind bars may then be subjected to additional brutality at the hands of a prison system that has been systematically denying transgender people their medication and placing trans women in male facilities. The bill passed 28-7, with one Republican voting against it, and it now heads to the Governor’s desk.

The bill, HB 752, states that "any person who knowingly and willfully enters a restroom or changing room in a government-owned building or a place of public accommodation designated for use by the opposite biological sex of such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor" punishable by up to one year in prison. A second offense within five years would be a felony carrying up to five years in state prison, and under Idaho's persistent violator statute, a fourth offense—the third felony—would carry a mandatory minimum of five years and a maximum of life. Notably, these provisions apply to private businesses, and the bill explicitly allows prior convictions under "a similar statute in another state, or any similar local ordinance" to count toward the escalation threshold—meaning a transgender person previously sanctioned under another state's bathroom ban could face felony charges on their first offense in Idaho.

The bill drew sharp criticism from a diverse range of opponents, unifying voices that typically do not share the same stance. ACLU Idaho focused on the extreme privacy violations and excessive penalties the bill would create, as well as the danger to transgender and cisgender people alike from weaponizing law enforcement against anyone who defies gender expectations. The Idaho Fraternal Order of Police also opposed the bill, with President Bryan Lovell warning that "in many circumstances, there is no clear or reasonable way for officers to make that determination without engaging in questioning or investigative actions that could be viewed as invasive and inappropriate." The Idaho Sheriffs' Association joined the opposition as well. Despite pleas from police, Bill sponsor Rep. Cornel Rasor refused to add a duty-to-depart amendment—a provision that exists in Florida's criminal bathroom ban and allows a person to avoid charges by leaving when asked—meaning a transgender person in Idaho could be arrested on the spot simply for being present.

If Governor Brad Little signs the bill into law, Idaho would become the fourth state with a major bathroom ban targeting transgender people through arrest or significant criminal or civil penalties. In Florida, where the offense is a misdemeanor carrying up to 60 days in jail, Marcy Rheintgen was arrested in March 2025 for washing her hands in a women's restroom at the state capitol. In Texas, where the bathroom ban took effect in December, four transgender women were detained at the state capitol and issued criminal trespass warnings banning them from the building for a year. And in Kansas, the state created a bounty hunter system allowing private citizens to sue transgender people encountered in a bathroom for $1,000. Idaho's bill goes further than all of them—the criminal offense is triggered by merely being present in the restroom, it applies to private businesses, and the penalties dwarf those in states that have already earned "do not travel" warnings on the Erin in the Morning trans legal risk assessment map.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bunnossin@hexbear.net 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The Idaho Fraternal Order of Police also opposed the bill, with President Bryan Lovell warning that "in many circumstances, there is no clear or reasonable way for officers to make that determination without engaging in questioning or investigative actions that could be viewed as invasive and inappropriate." The Idaho Sheriffs' Association joined the opposition as well.

God damn, even the pigs don't want this

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's a no-win situation for them. Even they understand they got enough problems without this new MAGA virtue signalling hornet's nest over an issue that doesn't even really exist.

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 86 points 3 days ago

It's wild that the cops are saying it's too invasive even for them

[-] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 51 points 3 days ago

Literally, how the fuck are they actually going to enforce this? Especially in a state like Idaho, tons of people are going to be carrying and if anyone asks to see their genitals bullets are going to fly.

[-] communism@lemmy.ml 42 points 3 days ago

Trans people who don't pass, Black women, and other people who aren't sufficiently gender-conforming for their liking will be made to prove their assigned gender in court.

[-] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 28 points 3 days ago

This is an attack on everyone that doesn't comply with stereotypes.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I imagine they are taking bathroom goers to the station before asking them to pull down their pants. At what point do you start blasting?

[-] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago

At what point do you start blasting?

Preferably when you're sitting on the toilet

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 29 points 3 days ago

its especially strange because the bill requires purpose, you could just say you went to the wrong room on accident as a defense. obviously dont say anything and plead the 5th if anything comes of it then your lawyer can trot that out

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago

Maybe I'm being too much of a doomer but I don't think it'd be difficult to convince a jury that a trans woman went to the women's bathroom on purpose.

[-] moss_icon@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago

All anti-trans bills are untenable and fall apart under the slightest scrutiny.

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago

jon lajoie suddenly going to be way more popular at karaoke night

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TrashGoblin@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago

The pig union doesn't want to pay out on lawsuits.

[-] CatoPosting@hexbear.net 70 points 3 days ago

It's truly depressing that the fascists have found their successful 'visible minority' to tear down the meager civil rights progress achieved in liberal democracies. I knew they were trying it with the gays in my early adulthood, realized it had been tried with Muslims in my childhood, but now they've managed to get most people to accept some amount of transphobia and nod along with, for instance, the IOC. My misanthropy has left remission.

[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 57 points 3 days ago

Unlimited unisex bathrooms on the first world bathroom qin-shi-huangdi-fireball

[-] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago

apparently not in idaho

[-] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 43 points 3 days ago

Is there a law that prevents sane business owners from simply not "designating" their restrooms based on "biological sex"?

[-] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 41 points 3 days ago

Gender neutral bathrooms? ILLEGAL.

[-] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago

So all businesses must have two bathrooms?

[-] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 28 points 3 days ago

Nothing in the law prevents businesses from having only a women's restroom and letting all men pee in the yard.

srs tho, these laws are never designed to be taken at face value, it's always entirely about the transphobia and any fallout is shrugged off. Everybody behind this stuff knows this. None of them care about the inevitable consequences of running on fairytale bullshit like objective, binary and immutable biological sex. It's the same as telling a terf that her definition of woman excludes intersex cis women. People think that's a gotcha, but leading terfs like Janice Raymond have outright stated that it doesn't bother them. Just as it doesn't bother any British transphobe that passing trans people are possibly forbidden from using any public restroom now.

The cruelty is the point. If there is unintended additional cruelty, it is gleefully taken as a bonus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[-] Chana@hexbear.net 48 points 3 days ago

Idaho is run by the epitome of rural MAGA and literal Nazi LARPers.

[-] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 30 points 3 days ago

Pretty sure there's a chunk of the NeoNazi set who think they should all move to Idaho and turn it into a fascist ethnostate. So, sadly, this isn't surprising

[-] Chana@hexbear.net 23 points 3 days ago

Yes they congregate at and around compounds in northern Idaho

[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago

Right, this flavor of hate has been collecting in Idaho (and organizing, legitimately) for years - long pre-dates Trump. Been bad and growing, should not be glossed over.

[-] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

started in the 70s or 80s I think. Look up the Northwest Territorial Imperative

This is why I am very sus of "leftists" who get all giddy at the thought of Cascadia as a separatist movement.

Cascadia flag:

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LeninWalksTheEarth@hexbear.net 52 points 3 days ago
[-] Commie_Chameleon@hexbear.net 56 points 3 days ago

Leave it to the US to make it a fucking competition between states for these bathroom laws.

Maybe it’s possible to get some resources pinned somewhere to help anyone who needs to get out of the state (assuming that isn’t already posted somewhere)?

[-] woodenghost@hexbear.net 53 points 3 days ago

Does Idaho even deserve bathrooms?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 3rdWorldCommieCat@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago

Life in prison for pedophiles? Nah, life in prison for a small harmless minority just existing? Sure, hell yea.

[-] XiaCobolt@hexbear.net 46 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is truly awful but I kind of also feel Võ Thị Thắng "your government won't last that long" about it

[-] Caitycat@hexbear.net 25 points 3 days ago

I feel similarly in that theres no way any law like this will last and be evenly enforced, especially after this administration, but at the same time I am worried about how much damage these freaks will manage to do before they lose access to power.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 27 points 3 days ago

Idaho bans toilets. If you shit you go to jail.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

What happens to someone who is cis but uses the "wrong" bathroom, whether out of expedience or just to troll the legislators? I'm a dude but at least where I'm from, if I notice a lady using the gents' room, I might mentally flag it, but I'm not gonna visibly react.

[-] XiaCobolt@hexbear.net 56 points 3 days ago

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 36 points 3 days ago

If you operate a business out of your own home do you have to get a second bathroom installed?

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You may not be aware of this fact, but all trans people have two of every hygiene tool in their home, including toilets. It's like kashrut, but for cleaning your butt instead of eating food.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 37 points 3 days ago

bathroom ban

No bathrooms allowed, use forests.

[-] onwardknave@hexbear.net 37 points 3 days ago

Then they flag you for indecent exposure, an put you on the sex offender registry, which they can then use to say "See? They're sexual deviants!" all while unironically supporting the Epstein class.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
155 points (100.0% liked)

news

24691 readers
1015 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS