15

'Black Pearl solid silver conductors drawn in diamond coated dies and insulated with virgin FEP dielectric' doesn't help.

Audio Science Review - $4000 Audio Cable vs $7!!! on YT

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

You know we’ve known this since the 80s right

[-] Trihilis@ani.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

But its easy clicks. Who even gives a shit, if people want to buy snake oil let them.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

There's definitely a difference between properly made and shielded cables and the cheapo ones that can be unshielded. However once you meet certain standards like using the correct impedance coax there's basically no improvement from making the cables "better".

I've noticed that the few "Amazon basics" products I've tried were surprisingly good quality, they're probably just about at the right specification.

[-] 51dusty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

the analogy I always draw is to wine.

the difference between a $5 bottle and a $20 is perceptible. but, the higher you go, the returns diminish exponentially unless you have a specific taste... and at some point paying the excessive amount of money becomes status not necessity.

yes, potatoes are conductive, but they don't have any shielding and the distance the signal travels in those experiments is irrelevant to practical applications. it is essentially a big wire nut.

if your application is long distances through conduit or many cables run in parallel you need higher quality ones with shielding. Granted, that is not the typical listener's case.

[-] uncrme@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

In this case scientific equipment determined no discernible difference in audio quality, though. I do actually believe in paying for nicer cables but up to a point and that's really mostly about build quality. $4000 for an RCA cable is just insanity.

[-] albbi@piefed.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago

With wine, the price literally affects how we perceive the taste of the wine. https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/baba-shiv-how-wines-price-tag-affect-its-taste

Although this research came out before the fMRI debacle...

[-] LikeableLime@piefed.social 0 points 3 weeks ago
[-] albbi@piefed.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I remembered hearing about it. Turns out there was this published in 2016 which I'm pretty sure was the issue I heard about. https://www.vice.com/en/article/fmri-scanner-study-flawed-pnas-anders-eklund/

As to whether anything more came of this I'm not sure.

[-] esc@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah it's a scam and everybody knows that it's a scam.

[-] null@lemmy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

One thing to consider is some of the cheaper cables have connectors that degrade after being plugged in more than three times.

[-] Nighed@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

The one thing I would ask is if they were tested in an electrically noisy environment + how long they last.

$4k is ridiculous, just buy the one that is twice the price of you want build quality.

[-] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck amazon. You can get pertectly good cable for cheap at many places.

[-] Evrala@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

As an audiophile myself, cable selection is very important. You see I have a very nice purple set of IEMs that came with a boring looking cable, I bought a nice looking purple braided cable the feels so nice in the hands and matches the shells.

There's another cable I got that looks classy and has wooden accents on the plug for my big headphones.

[-] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Listening in style is the what being an audiophile is all about 😎.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That doesn't test durability over 10 years of use

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

You could replace the $7 Amazon cable every week and it will still be cheaper than a $4000 cable that lasts ten years

[-] CubitOom@infosec.pub -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I tested this myself as a skeptic, just changed the cabels, but was able to hear a very clear difference with my ears. Although I couldn't explain that difference as I lacked the vocabulary, still do.

Maybe the testing criteria can't capture that difference either. Either way, you should do you own testing and figure out what you like since this is subjective.

Edit: the scientific method is to test for yourself.

Edit 2: I don't care if you downvote me, but if you refuse to test things like this out for yourself I am disappointed.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's not the scientific method lmao

[-] uber_chicken@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago
[-] CubitOom@infosec.pub 0 points 3 weeks ago

I don't care if you believe me, it sounded different in a indescribable way.

If music is important to you I think doing tests like this is something you should do to see if there is a difference for you.

Basically I see a test like this and it seems like this food has the same nutrients as this more expensive food so its the same, while not being able to test for how food actually tastes.

Expensive things are not automatically better, don't get me wrong.

[-] SARGE@startrek.website 1 points 3 weeks ago

Bruh you can tell us you have superpowers all you want, we have science telling us otherwise.

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago

Thank you for proving the placebo effect is real.

[-] schema@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

When i was about 9, i was absolutely convinced i could find water with the help of two metal rods. Whenever I held it over water, they would just magically cross without me doing anything. Until my dad filled some opaque cups with water and kept some empty, and put paper over all of them. I failed hard at sensing the the ones with water, even though i had earlier confirmed it worked on a cup with water in it.

Ever since that day I learned never to trust my own brain with things like these. Even though it might not be on purpose, our brain subconsciously deceives us into confirming our own bias.

You can try it out yourself. Have someone else switch the cables while you are not in the room. The try and identify which cable they used purely by sound. It's not as good as a double blind test, but it should be enough to test your own claim.

[-] FG_3479@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

As long as the cables are the correct guage and have shielding, there ahould be no audible difference.

[-] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You should have a friend switch them randomly and do 100 or so test listens, then report how often you guess it right. That would be more scientific, and if you had a good success rate would probably be a good basis for future experimentation by more professional teams. I truly encourage you to try this

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
15 points (94.1% liked)

Hardware

7070 readers
29 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS