12
submitted 20 hours ago by Scotty@scribe.disroot.org to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Archived link

Prime Minister Mark Carney would not say when asked whether China’s treatment of the Uyghurs amounted to genocide – as the House of Commons declared several years ago – but acknowledged the Asian country was “rightly called out” for its conduct toward this minority in the past.

Speaking to reporters Tuesday at an unrelated news conference in Quebec, Mr. Carney was asked whether he agreed with the [Canada's] 2021 House of Commons motion on genocide.

He declined to say but noted “there are fundamental issues in terms of China’s treatment of the Uyghurs in the past, and they’ve been rightly called out.”

Mr. Carney is still navigating the fallout from comments from new Liberal MP Michael Ma who last week cast doubt on reports of forced labour in China. Mr. Ma, who defected from the opposition Conservatives in December, has since apologized for his statements.

...

Mr. Ma sparked a backlash last Thursday after he challenged the existence of forced labour in China during a meeting of the Commons industry committee, which is examining Mr. Carney’s deal to allow 49,000 Chinese-made electric vehicles into Canada at a low tariff rate.

...

Last week, Margaret McCuaig-Johnston, a senior fellow at the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa, had told the Commons industry committee Thursday that electric vehicles (EV) are being built with Chinese aluminum products made by slave labourers in Xinjiang. A 2024 Human Rights Watch report also said major automakers including Tesla, BYD, GM, Toyota and Volkswagen are drawing aluminum from supply chains linked to Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang.

...

Uyghurs and other Turkic minorities in Xinjiang, a region some call East Turkestan, have faced years of repression, forced internment and coerced labour under Beijing, according to rights groups. A 2022 report from the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said China has committed “serious human rights violations” there that may amount to “crimes against humanity.”

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Reposting from same post on world news:

The Globe and Mail actively fights against Canada's and Canadians interests by distorting stories to suit conservative attack dog communications strategies.

It is owned by Woodbridge a holding company led by the Thompsons a Canadian aristocratic family (hereditary peer Baron of Fleet) and literally the voice of billionaires. Additional holdings include Thompson Reuters who is also in the news recently for enabling Palantir and ICE execute a fascist takeover in the states.

Various members are on record donating to the Conservative Party as well as funding partisan think tanks like the Fraser Institute.

In addition, this is a clear attempt to sabotage Carney's realpolitik attempts to diversify away from the US, including growing trade with China, by forcing domestic politics to virtue signal like Trudeau as a wedge with China. I.e. Force Carney to insult China publicly, to refreeze relations.

This line of action serves US interests in an attempt to subjugate and annex Canada. Thinly veiled treason.

[-] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 hours ago

Globe and Mail is hardly a right wing attack dog. Challenging the PM, or any politician on their position is the mandate and purpose of the media. Why should Carney get a pass?

[-] Soup@lemmy.world -4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Look, as much as I’m sure you aren’t wrong about it being a conservative mouthpiece Carney is just a really shitty person who has no idea what he’s doing actually running a country.

Interestingly, the Liberals are barely left of the Conservatives but if people start seeing them as functionally the same as Conservatives then we become a proper multi-party country again, and if we’re lucky we even start seeing the conservative vote being split while the NDP enjoy some space. This country is only going to get worse, in the way it’s been getting worse in front of out eyes for a long time now, if we keep this up.

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 9 points 17 hours ago

I'm a leftist so I generally hate Carney for a ton of reasons, but "has no idea what he's doing" is absolutely incorrect; he's been doing very well in response to the US and his actions have undoubtedly helped Canada. He's good for business and great for the economy; the country would be far weaker and in a much worse place if conservatives had won.

Far from ideal, and I'd much rather see the NDP gain ground... But from the realistic options Canadians had: I think they made the best choice possible and it's already paid dividends.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Read my other comment in here. Thinking Carney is doing good things for Canada requires a heavy amount of not paying attention to what he’s doing. He’s literally running the Liberals closer to Harper-era Conservatives than anything and we desperately need aggressive progress, not weak, middling responses.

If “Canada will unconditionally supprt the US in its attack on Iran” is what you call a strong response I mean fucking yikes, dude.

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 1 points 11 hours ago

"In that limited sense we supported that aspect. That is not a blank cheque. That is not us participating. That is not us asking for something in exchange for that [support]. That is a just a straight up position."

"We do however take this position with regret because the current conflict is another example of the failure of the international order."

(From a CBC article)

Far from perfect, certainly not 'unconditional'...

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

It was the first thing he said. He sinced walked it back, but his gut reaction was “unconditional”.

French article

No nuance, no “limited aspect”, he just went directly to sucking Trump’s dick until someone stopped him. Carney’s an empty suit who doesn’t give a shit about you. It was obvious to me back when he looked like a kid wearing his dad’s hockey jersey meekly talking about “elbows up”. He doesn’t stand for anything but monied interests and he’s not even hiding it.

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Carney’s an empty suit who doesn’t give a shit about you. [...] He doesn’t stand for anything but monied interests and he’s not even hiding it.

I completely agree with you there. And for those very reasons he's doing pretty good on the economy despite the circumstances. And his pushback against the Americans is far more than what the likes of Poilierve would do.

Doing pretty well in the eyes of Canadians too

https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/carney-approval-climbs-after-one-year-outpacing-poilievre-support-momentum

Could someone else be better? Probably.

Would almost anyone else be worse? Definitely.

Is he "bad" for Canada? Absolutely not.

But the election is what it was, and Canada made the best possible realistic choice with the options it had. All things considered, it's going pretty damn well. I have boatloads of criticisms, but the fact that his leadership has been a net positive is almost undeniable.

[-] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I don't especially like Carney, but you lose all credibility with:

Carney is just a really shitty person who has no idea what he’s doing actually running a country.

He is literally and figuratively one of the most qualified people on the planet for the job. He quickly laid out a coherent plan that is not only right for Canada and generally approved by Canadians, but a bold, and soberingly accurate assessment for our friends and allies around the world.

I award you no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.

I rarely downvote just for disagreeing, but this stinks of bad faith.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world -2 points 12 hours ago

He’s fucking useless. He’s firing tens of thousands of federal workers and recently just made a deal with Doug Ford to wave off $8.8bil worth of development fees for new homes which will not lead to lower house prices but will lead to taxpayers in more responsibly built places subsidizing low-density neighbourhoods even more than they already are. Weird that he could find a way to wave $8.8bil dollars but still needs to fire so many people in a time where the unemployment rate is already so fucking high.

Air Canada flight attendants exercise their rights? Don’t worry, Carney will be there to declare the strike illegal and try to force them back to work. He had more to say about the CEO not saying “sorry for your loss” in French than about Air Canada’s horrible payment practices.

He’s also giving massive breaks to O&G companies, many of which are based in the US, and some of those little bits of help are letting them tear up our environment without review.

When the US attacked Iran it took only a few hours for him to declare that Canada would “unconditionally support” the US.

STILL no electoral reform, too. The fact that the Liberals refuse to execute on that, because the non-partisan in committee found that they’d likely never win again, should disqualify them in the eyes of most any voter who actually wants a real democracy. It’s not hard to do, they simply won’t do it. Ten years and still nothing.

He’s fucking terrible, has no clue how to actually run a country, and I have no idea what you’re smoking that makes that look like good leadership but you might want to lay off before it fully cooks your brain.

[-] loonmusic@piefed.ca 7 points 19 hours ago

Why don't they make a list of questions that they know he can't publicly answer? "Mr Prime Minister, do you think that Donald Trump is a Russian puppet?"

[-] kbal@fedia.io 3 points 20 hours ago

The headline makes it sound as if they're being unfair. It doesn't matter that much whether he uses that one specific word, what matters is what he does say about it. But when you get down to the details of what he's said, it seems less unfair. Making trade deals with China might be profitable, but if it really does require being that deferential to them on this topic then the cost isn't worth it.

The same should apply to other countries as well, of course.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

LOL the GLobeandMaiol... would they write this same article about Israel's various genocides?

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago

No surprise. He always deny the genocide in Gaza and probably in sudan too

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
12 points (75.0% liked)

Canada

11820 readers
500 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS